05.04.2013 Views

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

Radioactive Waste Disposal at Sea: Public Ideas ... - IMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

204 Notes to pp. 46–51<br />

31. For example, an official from the Jamaican Ministry of Foreign Affairs has<br />

noted th<strong>at</strong> “in developing countries, the conflicts [“between any oblig<strong>at</strong>ion to prevent<br />

pollution of the marine environment and the effects of implementing th<strong>at</strong> oblig<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

on economic development”] are far more intense because the options open<br />

for economic development are limited” (Kirton 1977, p. 280).<br />

32. Grieco (1990, p. 10) has emphasized th<strong>at</strong> st<strong>at</strong>es are primarily concerned about<br />

their physical survival and their political independence. Snidal (1991) has challenged<br />

the realist claim th<strong>at</strong> st<strong>at</strong>es worry about how well they fare compared to other st<strong>at</strong>es<br />

(rel<strong>at</strong>ive gains), and not simply how well they fare themselves (absolute gains).<br />

33. For example, in April of 1977 the Carter administr<strong>at</strong>ion decided to defer commercial<br />

reprocessing of nuclear waste indefinitely because of the feared risk of prolifer<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of nuclear weapons. See Power 1979.<br />

34. See Keohane 1980, pp. 131–162.<br />

35. On benevolent and coercive hegemonic leaders, see Hasenclever et al. 1997,<br />

pp. 90–95.<br />

36. Grieco (1990, p. 10) has emphasized the Waltzian view on cooper<strong>at</strong>ion claiming<br />

th<strong>at</strong> such bargains would not take place: “. . . a rel<strong>at</strong>ive-gains problem for cooper<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

[exists]: a st<strong>at</strong>e will decline to join, will leave, or will sharply limit its<br />

commitment to a cooper<strong>at</strong>ive arrangement if it believes th<strong>at</strong> gaps in otherwise mutually<br />

positive gains favor partners.” For a recent discussion, see Snidal 1991 and<br />

Powell 1991. For a critical discussion of Grieco’s view, see Milner 1992.<br />

37. For the definition of mixed-motive games, see Schelling 1960, p. 89.<br />

38. See, e.g., Keohane’s discussion of bounded r<strong>at</strong>ionality and incomplete and partially<br />

available inform<strong>at</strong>ion (1984, pp. 110–116).<br />

39. On the games Prisoners’ Dilemma, Stag Hunt, and Chicken, see Oye 1986, pp.<br />

1–24. See also Axelrod and Keohane 1986, pp. 228–232.<br />

40. Realists, however, doubt th<strong>at</strong> the “shadow of the future” necessarily makes<br />

cooper<strong>at</strong>ion more likely. See Grieco 1990, p. 227.<br />

41. On N-person games, see Snidal 1986, pp. 52–55. On the significance of the<br />

number of actors, see Snidal 1995.<br />

42. On the benevolent effects of institutions’ transforming N-person games into<br />

collections of two-person games, see Axelrod and Keohane 1986, pp. 237–239.<br />

43. On issue density, see Keohane 1984, pp. 79–80.<br />

44. See, e.g., Keohane 1984, pp. 78–80. Those who stress th<strong>at</strong> hegemons act on<br />

selfish reasons when they provide public goods build upon Olson’s (1965, pp.<br />

33–34) argument about “privileged groups.”<br />

45. Keohane’s (1984) functional theory of intern<strong>at</strong>ional regimes explains regimes<br />

as means <strong>at</strong> the disposal of st<strong>at</strong>es wanting to cooper<strong>at</strong>e. On functional explan<strong>at</strong>ions,<br />

see Elster 1983, pp. 49–68.<br />

46. On focal points, see Schelling 1960, p. 70.<br />

47. See Young 1991.<br />

48. See Young 1989, pp. 373–374; Young 1991, pp. 302–305.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!