05.04.2013 Views

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98<br />

Descartes<br />

It is clear that the points B, D, F and H describe curves <strong>of</strong> different complexity.<br />

Point B describes a circle, which is acceptable as a 'construction curve'. The<br />

movements <strong>of</strong> points D, F and H, however, are directly and clearly coupled to the<br />

movement <strong>of</strong> point B, and, as Descartes argues, why would these curves not be<br />

acceptable as well?<br />

Activity 7.13 Reflecting on Descartes, 18<br />

1 Let YA = a, YC = x and CD = y in Figure 7.13. Show that the curve AD can be<br />

described by the equation x 4 = a 2 1 x + y 2 ).<br />

Acceptable curves<br />

The previous section shows that Descartes did not want to restrict the set <strong>of</strong><br />

acceptable construction curves to the line and the circle. He wanted to expand this<br />

set under one condition: the curve must be described by a continuous movement or<br />

by an acceptable sequence <strong>of</strong> continuous movements, in which every movement is<br />

completely determined by its predecessor. The line and the circle remain the starting<br />

points; they act as the original 'predecessor' <strong>of</strong> all curves.<br />

Descartes knew that this condition does not directly lead to an immediately<br />

recognisable set <strong>of</strong> curves. Read what he writes about this.<br />

26 I could give here several other ways <strong>of</strong> tracing and conceiving a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> curved lines, each curve more complex than any preceding one,<br />

but I think the best way to group together all such curves and then classify<br />

them in order, is by recognising the factthat all points <strong>of</strong> those curves<br />

which we may call "geometric", that is, those which admit <strong>of</strong> precise and<br />

exact measurement, must bear a definite relation to all points <strong>of</strong> a straight<br />

line, and that this relation must be expressed by means <strong>of</strong> a single<br />

equation. If this equation contains no term <strong>of</strong> higher degree than the<br />

rectangle <strong>of</strong> two unknown quantities, or the square <strong>of</strong> one, the curve<br />

belongs to the first and simplest class, which contains only the circle, the<br />

parabola, the hyperbola, and the ellipse; but when the equation contains<br />

one or more terms <strong>of</strong> the third or fourth degree in one or both <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

unknown quantities (for it requires two unknown quantities to express the<br />

relation between two points) the curve belongs to the second class; and if<br />

the equation contains a term <strong>of</strong> the fifth or sixth degree in either or both <strong>of</strong><br />

the unknown quantities the curve belongs to the third class, and so on<br />

indefinitely.<br />

According to many this part <strong>of</strong> the text initiates the birth <strong>of</strong> analytical geometry: all<br />

points <strong>of</strong> a curve are unambiguously related to points on a straight line, and this<br />

relation can be described with one single equation with two unknown quantities.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!