history of mathematics - National STEM Centre
history of mathematics - National STEM Centre
history of mathematics - National STEM Centre
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
98<br />
Descartes<br />
It is clear that the points B, D, F and H describe curves <strong>of</strong> different complexity.<br />
Point B describes a circle, which is acceptable as a 'construction curve'. The<br />
movements <strong>of</strong> points D, F and H, however, are directly and clearly coupled to the<br />
movement <strong>of</strong> point B, and, as Descartes argues, why would these curves not be<br />
acceptable as well?<br />
Activity 7.13 Reflecting on Descartes, 18<br />
1 Let YA = a, YC = x and CD = y in Figure 7.13. Show that the curve AD can be<br />
described by the equation x 4 = a 2 1 x + y 2 ).<br />
Acceptable curves<br />
The previous section shows that Descartes did not want to restrict the set <strong>of</strong><br />
acceptable construction curves to the line and the circle. He wanted to expand this<br />
set under one condition: the curve must be described by a continuous movement or<br />
by an acceptable sequence <strong>of</strong> continuous movements, in which every movement is<br />
completely determined by its predecessor. The line and the circle remain the starting<br />
points; they act as the original 'predecessor' <strong>of</strong> all curves.<br />
Descartes knew that this condition does not directly lead to an immediately<br />
recognisable set <strong>of</strong> curves. Read what he writes about this.<br />
26 I could give here several other ways <strong>of</strong> tracing and conceiving a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> curved lines, each curve more complex than any preceding one,<br />
but I think the best way to group together all such curves and then classify<br />
them in order, is by recognising the factthat all points <strong>of</strong> those curves<br />
which we may call "geometric", that is, those which admit <strong>of</strong> precise and<br />
exact measurement, must bear a definite relation to all points <strong>of</strong> a straight<br />
line, and that this relation must be expressed by means <strong>of</strong> a single<br />
equation. If this equation contains no term <strong>of</strong> higher degree than the<br />
rectangle <strong>of</strong> two unknown quantities, or the square <strong>of</strong> one, the curve<br />
belongs to the first and simplest class, which contains only the circle, the<br />
parabola, the hyperbola, and the ellipse; but when the equation contains<br />
one or more terms <strong>of</strong> the third or fourth degree in one or both <strong>of</strong> the two<br />
unknown quantities (for it requires two unknown quantities to express the<br />
relation between two points) the curve belongs to the second class; and if<br />
the equation contains a term <strong>of</strong> the fifth or sixth degree in either or both <strong>of</strong><br />
the unknown quantities the curve belongs to the third class, and so on<br />
indefinitely.<br />
According to many this part <strong>of</strong> the text initiates the birth <strong>of</strong> analytical geometry: all<br />
points <strong>of</strong> a curve are unambiguously related to points on a straight line, and this<br />
relation can be described with one single equation with two unknown quantities.