05.04.2013 Views

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Activity 10.10 Objections to negative numbers<br />

Interestingly Euler and<br />

Saunderson were both<br />

blind, Euler only for the<br />

last 17 years <strong>of</strong> his life,<br />

but Saunderson from the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 1, when he<br />

suffered from smallpox.<br />

10 'Two minuses make a plus'<br />

In the following extract, Arnauld raises strong objections to the use <strong>of</strong> negative<br />

numbers.<br />

... je ne comprens pas que le quarre de -5 puisee etre la meme chose que<br />

le quarre de +5, et que I'un et I'autre soit +25, Je ne sgai de plus comment<br />

ajuster cela au fondement de la multiplication, qui est que I'unite doit etre<br />

a I'une des grandeurs que Ton multiplie, comme I'autre est au produit. Ce<br />

qui est egalement vrai dans les entiers et dans les fractions. Car 1 est a 3,<br />

comme 4 est a 12. Et 1 est a \ comme \ est a -fe . Mais je ne puis ajuster<br />

cela aux multiplications de deux moins. Car dira-t-on que +1 est a -4,<br />

comme -5 est a +20? Je ne le vois pas. Car +1 est plus que -4. Et au<br />

contraire -5 est moins que +20. Au lieu que dans toutes les autres<br />

proportions, si le premier terme est plus grand que le second, le troisieme<br />

doit etre plus grand que le quatrieme.<br />

1 a Translate the extract from Arnauld's letter into English. If you believe that<br />

your French is not up to it, then ask the help <strong>of</strong> a friend - but not before having tried<br />

to get an impression for yourself <strong>of</strong> what Arnauld claims. (You should only refer to<br />

the hint as a last resort!)<br />

b Which properties <strong>of</strong> numbers is Arnauld using in his argument?<br />

c From the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> modern-day <strong>mathematics</strong>, what is the fallacy in his<br />

argument? What part <strong>of</strong> your A-level course can you use to argue against Arnauld?<br />

It took until the middle <strong>of</strong> the 18th century for further developments to take place;<br />

then they accelerated. Leonard Euler (1707-1783) and Nicholas Saunderson (1682-<br />

1739) were partly responsible for this. They produced some <strong>of</strong> the first algebra<br />

textbooks, which dwelt at some length on the rules for multiplying negative<br />

numbers. This emphasis was quite natural, because negative numbers and their rules<br />

<strong>of</strong> combination had not been described in texts until that time. Both texts were<br />

intended for teaching and were considered well designed for this purpose, and many<br />

editions <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> them were published. It has been said that the textbooks were<br />

easily understandable partly because <strong>of</strong> their authors' blindness; Euler, for example,<br />

had to dictate his text and make it intelligible to a relatively unskilled person.<br />

Activity 10.11 A debate about negative numbers<br />

The following is an extract from Euler's Elements <strong>of</strong> Algebra, which first appeared<br />

in 1774. Many editions were published centuries later. This one is from the 1828<br />

edition.<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!