05.04.2013 Views

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

products will be in arithmetical progression, as above;<br />

but the first two products are 12 and 0; therefore the<br />

third will be -12; therefore -4 multiplied into +3,<br />

produces -12.<br />

Case 3d. To prove that + 4 multiplied into -3<br />

produces -12; multiply + 4 into +3, 0 and -3<br />

successively, and the products will be in arithmetical<br />

progression; but the first two are 12 and 0, therefore the<br />

third will be -12 ; therefore +4 multiplied into -3,<br />

produces -12.<br />

Case 4th. Lastly, to demonstrate, that -4 multiplied<br />

into -3 produces +12, multiply -4 into 3, 0 and -3<br />

successively, and the products will be in arithmetical<br />

progression; but the two first products are -12 and 0, by<br />

the second case; therefore the third product will be +12;<br />

therefore -4 multiplied into -3. produces +12.<br />

10 'Two minuses make a plus'<br />

Cas. 2nd + 4, 0, -4 Cas. 3d + 4, + 4, +4<br />

+3, +3, +3<br />

+3, 0, -3<br />

+12, 0, -12. +12, 0, -12.<br />

Cas. 4th - 4, - 4, - 4<br />

3, 0, -3<br />

-12, 0, +12.<br />

These 4 cases may be also more briefly demonstrated<br />

thus: +4 multiplied into +3 produces +12 ; therefore -4<br />

into +3, or +4 into -3 ought to produce something<br />

contrary to +12, that is, -12: but if-4 multiplied into +3<br />

produces -12, then -4 multiplied into -3 ought to<br />

produce something contrary to -12, that is, +12; so that<br />

this last case, so very formidable to young beginners,<br />

appears at last to amount to no more than a common<br />

principle in Grammar, to wit, that two negatives make an<br />

affirmative; which is undoubtedly true in Grammar, though<br />

perhaps it may not always be observed in languages.<br />

If possible, work on this activity in groups <strong>of</strong> three to six. One or two students<br />

should designate themselves as representing Euler, another student Saunderson,<br />

and another student Arnauld, as introduced above. Then work through the activities<br />

below. If you are working on your own, alternative activities are suggested.<br />

1 a Everyone should read through the extracts from Euler's and Saunderson's<br />

books. Then, together, draw up a list <strong>of</strong> assumptions made by each author to enable<br />

him to derive the rules relating to the multiplication <strong>of</strong> negative numbers.<br />

b If you are representing either Euler or Saunderson, imagine yourself in his place<br />

and prepare to defend his position against the objections raised by Arnauld. If you<br />

are representing Arnauld, prepare to argue your case against either Euler or<br />

Saunderson. Stage a debate in front <strong>of</strong> your fellow students and ask them to judge<br />

who makes the most convincing case.<br />

If you are working on your own, but within a group <strong>of</strong> other <strong>mathematics</strong> students,<br />

prepare an oral presentation summarising Arnauld's views and either Euler's or<br />

Saunderson's. Make the presentation to the other students. As part <strong>of</strong> your<br />

preparation, make clear which 'side' you would be on and why.<br />

Otherwise, write an essay summarising Arnauld's views and either Euler's or<br />

Saunderson's. Give your own opinions on the validity <strong>of</strong> the respective arguments.<br />

If you were working in groups on Activity 10.11, you may have reached the position<br />

at the end <strong>of</strong> the debate that your fellow students were unable to choose which pair<br />

made the most convincing argument. As Euler or Saunderson, you might have found<br />

it difficult to convince Arnauld that his objections to negative numbers were<br />

incorrect. Likewise, as Arnauld, you might have found it hard to establish that your<br />

objections really do correspond to a flaw in Euler's or Saunderson's arguments.<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!