05.04.2013 Views

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 Answers<br />

b The required number is -2 as 2 + (-2) = 0 . The same<br />

is true if the addition were carried out in the reverse<br />

order. For this reason -2 is called the inverse <strong>of</strong> 2 under<br />

addition since under addition 2 and -2 combine to give<br />

the identity under addition. All numbers have an inverse<br />

under addition; given any number, it is always possible to<br />

find another which will combine with it under addition to<br />

give 0.<br />

c The number which is the inverse <strong>of</strong> 2 under<br />

multiplication is j since 2x^ = ^x2 = 1. It is not<br />

always possible to find an inverse under multiplication<br />

for every number. Take 0 for example: there is no<br />

number which when multiplied with 0 gives the identity<br />

under multiplication.<br />

d The statement is not true because 0 does not have an<br />

inverse under multiplication. It would be true if it were<br />

modified to the following.<br />

If a non-zero number is chosen at random, then the<br />

axioms require that it is always possible to find another<br />

non-zero number which, when combined with the<br />

original number using the operation x , gives 1 .<br />

Activity 11.6, page 142<br />

1 a The number 0 is an identity under f since it<br />

satisfies f(a,0) = f(0,fl) = a.<br />

The number 1 is an identity under g since for any a it<br />

satisfies g(a,l) = g(l,a) = «•<br />

For every number a there is another number, —a, which<br />

combines with it under f so that f(a,—a) = f(-a,a) = 0.<br />

For every non-zero number a there is another number, — ,<br />

a<br />

which combines with it under g so that<br />

b It is true for f since the order in which we add<br />

numbers together does not affect the outcome. For<br />

example, 2 + 3 is the same as 3 + 2 . This is true in<br />

general and as a result addition <strong>of</strong> numbers is said to be a<br />

commutative operation.<br />

The statement is true for g too since multiplication <strong>of</strong><br />

numbers is a commutative operation.<br />

Activity 11.7, page 143<br />

1 Complex numbers a + i b consist <strong>of</strong> a real part a and<br />

an imaginary part b. The number b can be zero so that the<br />

imaginary part can be zero. So all real numbers are at the<br />

same time complex numbers, they are special complex<br />

182<br />

numbers in the sense that the imaginary part is zero.<br />

Zero, the identity under addition, is thus a perfectly valid<br />

complex number which performs the same function in<br />

complex numbers as it does to real; that is, when zero is<br />

added to any complex number it leaves that complex<br />

number unchanged. For example:<br />

(2 + 3i) + (0 + Oi) = 2 + 3i . (0 + 0 i), or just plain 0, is the<br />

identity under addition.<br />

In a similar way (l + Oi), or 1, is the identity under<br />

multiplication.<br />

2 The inverse under addition <strong>of</strong> 2 + i is (-2 -i) since<br />

The inverse under multiplication is a bit trickier to find.<br />

You are trying to find a complex number which when<br />

multiplied by 2 + i gives (1 + Oi) . Suppose that the<br />

inverse is a + ib then<br />

(2 + i)(a + ib) = 2a + ia + 2ib + i 2 b<br />

= (2a-b) + (a + 2b)i<br />

This should be (1 + Oi) and so you know that 2a-b = \<br />

and a + 2b = 0 . You can solve these simultaneously to<br />

find that a = ^,b = -\.<br />

Activity 11.9, page 144<br />

1 a To build up a step <strong>of</strong> length 1 2 to the left from the<br />

basic building blocks: first take a step <strong>of</strong> length 1 to the<br />

right, increase its length by multiplying by 1 2 and then<br />

reverse the direction by incorporating a minus sign in<br />

front which is effectively multiplying by - 1 . Thus<br />

l-> 12-^-12.<br />

b When tripled, a step <strong>of</strong> 2 to the left becomes a step <strong>of</strong><br />

6 to the left; reversing produces a step <strong>of</strong> 6 to the right;<br />

then doubling produces a step <strong>of</strong> 1 2 to the right.<br />

Using Clifford's notation, this is<br />

&2(r3(-2)) = +12 , or in usual notation<br />

The same outcome can be achieved by for example<br />

taking the step <strong>of</strong> the 2 to the left, reversing it, then<br />

tripling and then doubling. The order <strong>of</strong> the tripling and<br />

doubling operations can be interchanged and they can<br />

take place before or after the reversal. The reversal<br />

operation commutes with the other operations and they<br />

commute with each other, that is, the order in which they<br />

are carried out does not affect the outcome.<br />

2 a To do this you take the standard step and reverse it<br />

and then multiply it by one-half, or vice versa.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!