05.04.2013 Views

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

history of mathematics - National STEM Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

An Arabic commentary by<br />

al-Naziri on Heron's work<br />

quotes Euclid's Elements,<br />

Book II, propositions 1, 3<br />

and 2 in support <strong>of</strong> the<br />

results shown as (1), (3) ,„<br />

and (5), respectively. Jjjj<br />

5 Arab <strong>mathematics</strong><br />

Given: BL = BP + PL where P is the mid-point <strong>of</strong> DL.<br />

To show that: BL x DB + (BP) 2 = (DP) 2<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>: DB x BL = DB x (BP + PL). (1)<br />

Add (BP) 2 to both sides <strong>of</strong> this equation and substitute DP for PL to get<br />

DP x DB + BP x DB + (BP) = BL x DB + (BP) 2 .<br />

(2)<br />

But BP x DB + (BP) 2 = (DB + BP) x BP = DP x BP<br />

Combining the last two equations gives<br />

DP x BP + DP x DB = BL x DB + (BP) 2<br />

Also DP x BP + DP x DB = DP x (BP + DB) = (DP) 2 .<br />

Combining the last two equations gives the final result<br />

BLxDB + (BP) 2 =(DP) 2<br />

To continue with Abu Kamil's solution, in Figure 5.9a, BL x DB + (BP) 2 = (DP) 2<br />

where (DP) 2 = 5 2 = 25, and BL x DB = area <strong>of</strong> ABLH = 21.<br />

So(BP) 2 =4orBP = 2.<br />

Therefore DP - BP = DB = x - 5 - 2 = 3 or the area <strong>of</strong> square ABDG is 9.<br />

To find the other root <strong>of</strong> x, which is the side <strong>of</strong> square ABDG in Figure 5.9b, a<br />

similar argument, using another result from Euclid, gives<br />

WBxBD + (BP) 2 =(PD) 2 where (PD) 2 =25, WBxBD = 21 and (BP) 2 =4.<br />

So PD + BP = BD = x = 5 + 2 = 1 or the area <strong>of</strong> square ABDG is 49.<br />

3 Express Euclid's rule algebraically and explain why it works.<br />

4 Describe the two solutions in your own words.<br />

5 What differences do you notice between the two approaches?<br />

Solution <strong>of</strong> cubic equations<br />

In his book Algebra, Omar Khayyam explored the possibility <strong>of</strong> using parts <strong>of</strong><br />

intersecting conies to solve cubic equations. Traces <strong>of</strong> such approaches are found in<br />

the works <strong>of</strong> earlier writers such as Menaechmus (circa 350 BC) and Archimedes<br />

(287-212 BC), and Omar Khayyam's near contemporary al-Hayatham (circa 965-<br />

1039). They observed, for quantities a, b, c and d, that if — = — = — , then<br />

2 ( c \( d \ c c d a<br />

= \ — \\ — \- — a or c 3 = b 2a . If b = 1 , you y can calculate the cube root <strong>of</strong> a if c<br />

and d exist so that c<br />

2<br />

= d and d = ac .<br />

Omar Khayyam re-discovered and extended the geometric argument implicit in this<br />

algebra. If you think <strong>of</strong> c and d as variables and <strong>of</strong> a as a constant, then the<br />

equations c 2 = d and d 2 = ac are the equations <strong>of</strong> two parabolas with perpendicular<br />

axes and the same vertex. This is illustrated in Figure 5.10. The two parabolas have<br />

the same vertex B, with axes AB = a and CB = b = 1 , and they intersect at E. In the<br />

rectangle BDEF, BF = DE = c and BD — FE = d . Since AB is a line segment and<br />

the point E lies on the parabola with vertex B and axis AB, the rectangle BDEF has<br />

the property that (FE) = AB x BF or d 2 = ac .<br />

(3)<br />

(4)<br />

(5)<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!