03.05.2013 Views

OVERVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE ... - IIED pubs

OVERVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE ... - IIED pubs

OVERVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF MINING ON THE ... - IIED pubs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

neutralize each other – this situation is often referred to as an “antagonistic” or “counteractive” interaction.<br />

Three typical wastes provide a simple example of this type of situation, namely: acid rock drainage, raw sewage<br />

and power station ash. Individually, these wastes exert serious adverse impacts on aquatic environments; in<br />

combination, however, they neutralize and offset each other so that their combined effect on the aquatic<br />

environment is often innocuous.<br />

In the context of this study, these examples of cumulative impacts are highly relevant as the three river basins<br />

evaluated in this study all contain very large numbers of mining operations as well as a wide variety of industries<br />

and other forms of land use. In combination, therefore, there is a large potential for the impacts of mining<br />

operations to add to, or possibly even counteract, some of the impacts from these other activities.<br />

2.7 The role and importance of natural weathering processes<br />

Natural weathering processes exert a marked influence on soil formation and also on the types and quantities of<br />

materials that enter aquatic systems from the surrounding landscape. Whilst climatic features as well as the parent<br />

rock material, degree of vegetation cover and prevailing landuse, control the specific type and extent of weathering<br />

processes that are active within a given area, weathering zones can be delineated on the basis of the degree to<br />

which chemical or mechanical weathering processes are dominant. A useful index of weathering processes is<br />

provided by a simple relationship between annual precipitation and evaporation (Weinert, 1964). This<br />

dimensionless index, the "Weinert N" value, is calculated as:<br />

12 x EJ<br />

N = ────<br />

PA<br />

Where:<br />

EJ = Mean evaporation (in millimetres) for the month of January, and<br />

PA = Mean annual precipitation (in millimetres).<br />

Where specific monthly evaporation data are scarce, taking 10% of the total annual evaporation can approximate<br />

January evaporation values. The specific types of weathering processes that predominate in regions with different<br />

Weinert N values are shown in Table 2.3.<br />

Table 2.3: Weathering characteristics associated with different Weinert N values.<br />

Weinert Index Value Weathering Characteristics<br />

0.00 – 2.00 Predominantly chemical weathering<br />

2.01 – 4.00 (Wet) Seasonal dominance of chemical weathering<br />

4.01 – 5.00 Approximately equal chemical and physical weathering<br />

> 5.00 Dominance of physical weathering processes<br />

lxi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!