10.06.2013 Views

Fisheries in the Southern Border Zone of Takamanda - Impact ...

Fisheries in the Southern Border Zone of Takamanda - Impact ...

Fisheries in the Southern Border Zone of Takamanda - Impact ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 Sunderland-Groves et al.<br />

proved unnecessary. All evidence <strong>of</strong> human activity<br />

(traps, snares, hunter paths, bush houses, spent cartridges,<br />

gunshots heard, etc.) was recorded to evaluate hunt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pressures. We also recorded changes <strong>in</strong> topography and<br />

vegetation along each transect. The sampl<strong>in</strong>g effort<br />

between transects was standardized by keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> observers, speed <strong>of</strong> travel, and time <strong>of</strong> day<br />

consistent. Transects were not walked dur<strong>in</strong>g heavy or<br />

medium ra<strong>in</strong>fall as this affects mammal movements and<br />

observer reliability (see Sunderland-Groves and Maisels<br />

this volume).<br />

For ape nests, care was taken to dist<strong>in</strong>guish “def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

gorilla nest” (nest on <strong>the</strong> ground or tree nest with gorilla<br />

dung underneath) from “def<strong>in</strong>ite chimp nest” (tree nests<br />

with chimp dung underneath). If a nest site had both tree<br />

and ground nests, it was a def<strong>in</strong>ite gorilla nest site<br />

because chimps never build ground nests. Ape dung is<br />

easily dist<strong>in</strong>guished by smell and form, but old tree nests<br />

without dung cannot be assigned to gorillas or chimps<br />

with confidence. Therefore, nest sites where all nests<br />

were <strong>in</strong> trees were recorded as “tree-only nest sites.”<br />

Upon locat<strong>in</strong>g a nest site each area was thoroughly<br />

searched to ensure that all nests with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> group were<br />

identified and recorded. These data were <strong>the</strong>n used to<br />

calculate mean nest group size.<br />

Random nest searches were conducted <strong>in</strong> highland<br />

areas ei<strong>the</strong>r after data collection on transects had been<br />

completed or to confirm presence or absence <strong>of</strong> apes at<br />

sites where time was not sufficient to conduct transect<br />

surveys. The additional data recorded dur<strong>in</strong>g nest<br />

searches were used to calculate overall mean group size.<br />

Nest data collection dur<strong>in</strong>g random nest searches<br />

followed <strong>the</strong> same protocols as those undertaken dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transect surveys.<br />

4.4 Data analysis<br />

4.4.1 Distribution <strong>of</strong> apes and <strong>of</strong> human<br />

pressure<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> gorillas and chimps with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Takamanda</strong> Reserve and adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forests was <strong>in</strong>ferred<br />

from <strong>the</strong> geographic location <strong>of</strong> sign that could be<br />

def<strong>in</strong>itely assigned to one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two species.<br />

<strong>Takamanda</strong>: <strong>the</strong> Biodiversity <strong>of</strong> an African Ra<strong>in</strong>forest<br />

4.4.2 Group size<br />

Each nest site is <strong>the</strong> sleep<strong>in</strong>g site for one group <strong>of</strong> apes<br />

for one night. All weaned <strong>in</strong>dividuals make one nest per<br />

night, so <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> each nest group is an <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong><br />

group size. There are variations as occasionally apes may<br />

make a second nest dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> night or sleep on <strong>the</strong><br />

ground without mak<strong>in</strong>g a nest. However, mean group<br />

size can be roughly calculated for gorillas us<strong>in</strong>g all nest<br />

groups that can def<strong>in</strong>itely be assigned to gorillas. Mean<br />

nest group size and standard deviation for nest groups<br />

that could only be assigned to “apes” were calculated<br />

from <strong>the</strong> tree-only nest sites.<br />

4.4.3 Abundance <strong>of</strong> apes and <strong>of</strong> human sign<br />

The encounter rate (number <strong>of</strong> observations per km <strong>of</strong><br />

transect) was used to estimate relative abundance <strong>of</strong><br />

humans and apes throughout <strong>the</strong> survey and also to<br />

compare between sites and seasons.<br />

Because DISTANCE could not be used, gorilla and<br />

chimpanzee densities were roughly calculated under <strong>the</strong><br />

formula proposed by Tut<strong>in</strong> and Fernandez (1984):<br />

[(N/A)/V][M]=D,<br />

where N=number <strong>of</strong> sleep<strong>in</strong>g sites, A=area sampled<br />

<strong>in</strong> km 2, V=mean number <strong>of</strong> days <strong>the</strong> nest rema<strong>in</strong>s visible,<br />

M=median nest group size, and D=number <strong>of</strong> weaned<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals/km².<br />

Encounter rates were calculated (number <strong>of</strong> nests or<br />

nest sites per km walked, per stratum, and/or per season)<br />

and compared between strata and seasons between this<br />

study and previous work by March (1957) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

region, and gorilla surveys carried out elsewhere <strong>in</strong><br />

Africa (Williamson and Usongo 1995, Maisels and<br />

Cruickshank 1996, Hall et al. 1998).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> lowland forest at Lopé, Gabon, gorilla nests<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed visible for an average <strong>of</strong> 78 days (Tut<strong>in</strong> et al.<br />

1995). Mean chimp nest duration <strong>in</strong> Gabon was 113.6<br />

days (Tut<strong>in</strong> and Fernandez 1984). S<strong>in</strong>ce no data are<br />

available on <strong>the</strong> deterioration rate <strong>of</strong> nest sites <strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!