Fisheries in the Southern Border Zone of Takamanda - Impact ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

60 O’Kah Table 6. Indicators of secondary or disturbed forest in Takamanda Forest Reserve, Cameroon. Species Sites occurring 1. Eurema (Terias) hecabe solifera 2. Danaus (Anosia) chrysippus aegyptius 3. Junonia oenone oenone B/W Obonyi I & III, Matene Camp, Takamanda areas Assam, Obonyi I Magbe and Takamanda Assam and Takamanda Camp areas 4. Junonia terea elgiva Assam, Matene Camp, Obonyi I Magbe Using butterflies as indicators of forest quality suggests that Assam is the most degraded site, as nearly all species that occur there prefer secondary habitat. Takamanda, Matene Camp, and Obonyi I Magbe also show signs of degradation. Even though the sampling sites were located in undisturbed areas away from the camps, the species composition indicates that some unseen factor is influencing species composition in favor of butterflies that are adapted to degraded habitats. Three of the four campsites sampled in the study are popular with such species. Table 7. Indicators of secondary or disturbed forest and their sites of occurrence in Takamanda Forest Reserve, Cameroon. Species Sites occurring 1. Papilio Obonyi I Camp (Princeps) dardanus 2. Nepheronia Matene Camp, Kekpani Camp argia argia XI and Takamanda 3. Leptosia alcesta inalcesta 4. Euphaedra medon fraudata B/W Obonyi III and Kekpani, Obonyi I Camp and Obonyi I Magbe. B/W Obonyi III & Kekpani, B/W Okpambe & Assam, Kekpani Camp XI, Obonyi I Camp, Obonyi I Hills, Obonyi I Magbe, & Takamanda Takamanda: the Biodiversity of an African Rainforest In short, our findings may demonstrate that TFR is an intact forest in the initial stages of degradation. This was not directly apparent from field observations, but analysis of the results of this study point to the fact that butterfly composition is more sensitive to changes and thus may provide a good indicator of future conditions. Still, we found species that are common throughout the Reserve in different habitat types (Table 7). Though very little work has been undertaken on the butterfly fauna of Cameroon, the immediate neighboring forests between Korup (including the Rumpi Hills) and Oban Hills in Nigeria have been studied (Obot and Ogar 1997). A cursory analysis of the results from these areas and those from our studies reveals an association in the butterfly fauna. About 40% of the species identified for TFR were also found to occur in Korup and/or the Oban Hills. Genera such as Eurema, Junonia, Bicyclus, Charaxes, Acrea, Euphaedra, are all represented in the communities of each site. There are, however, some common species (e.g. Papilio lormieri, Belenois sudanensis) that one would expect to find in the Korup list, but that curiously do not appear. The affinities between Korup and TFR are explained by the fact that the two forests are virtually contiguous and share similar physical and biological characteristics. Many of the butterfly species of both forests are migrant species, some local migrants, and hence should be able to move between the two areas. Thus, it is likely attributed to the less degraded conditions in Takamanda Forest Reserve compared with Korup. 4 Conclusion Because little data are available on butterfly distribution in Cameroon (Larsen 1997), the results of this study will contribute to: • a better understanding of the natural history of different butterfly species, • their range, distribution, and affinity for different habitat types,
Butterfly Fauna Table 8. Species common to all forest categories occurring in Takamanda Forest Reserve, Cameroon. Species Sites occurring 1. Papilio (Princeps) dardanus Obonyi I Camp 2. Nepheronia argia argia Matene Camp, Kekpani Camp XI and Takamanda 3. Leptosia alcesta inalcesta B/W Obonyi III and Kekpani, Obonyi I Camp and Obonyi I Magbe. B/W Obonyi III & Kekpani, B/W Okpambe & Assam, 4. Euphaedra medon fraudata Kekpani Camp XI, Obonyi I Camp, Obonyi I Hills, Obonyi I Magbe, & Takamanda • a checklist of species for Takamanda Forest Reserve, and • baseline information needed to monitor the success of conservation measures that use butterflies as indicators. This study represents an important first step in identifying likely sites to concentrate conservation efforts, based on the changing composition of species within the butterfly community. Areas where degradation has occurred or is beginning to take place should be targeted for initial conservation measures. The study can be improved through additional research over longer periods time to cover seasonal ranges within the variety of habitat types. A key question that remains to be answered is whether or not using butterflies as indicators will enable researchers to predict the presence of other taxa and thereby contribute immensely to studies of overall ecosystem health at TFR. References Borror, D. J., C. A. Triplehorn, and N. F. Johnson. 1989. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. 6th edition. Saunders College Pub., Philadelphia . Carcasson, R. H., P. R. Ackery, C. R. Smith, and R.I. Vane-Wright (eds.). 1995. Carcasson’s African Butterflies: An Annotated Catalogue of the Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea of the Afrotropical Region. CSIRO, East Melbourne and Natural History Museum, London. Davies, G. 1994. Guidelines for wildlife surveys in tropical forests. Ehrlich, P. R., and P. H.Raven. 1964. Butterflies and plants: A study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608. Feltwell, J. 1993. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Butterflies. Quarto Publishing, London. Fomete Nembot, T., and Z. Tchanou. 1998. La gestion des ecosystems forestiers du Cameroun a l’aube de l’an 2000. Volume 2 (Monographies des sites critiques et annexes). IUCN, Yaoundé. Haile, A., and T. Hofsvang. 2001. Infestation, damage, and insecticidal control of the stem borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) on sorghum in Eritrea. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 78(4): 249-254. Johnson, S. D. 1994. Evidence for Batesian mimicry in a butterfly-pollinated orchid. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 53: 91-104. Larsen T. B. 1996. The Butterflies of Kenya and their Natural History. Oxford University Press. New York.. 61 SI/MAB Series #8, 2003
Page 2 and 3:
Smithsonian Institution SI/MAB Biod
Page 4 and 5:
ii 10. Fisheries in the Southern Bo
Page 6 and 7:
Mercy Abwe Dione Dept. of Biology,
Page 8 and 9:
The Smithsonian Institution has lon
Page 10 and 11:
The editors of this publication ext
Page 12 and 13:
2 Sunderland-Groves et al. Figure 1
Page 14 and 15:
4 Sunderland-Groves et al. Rainfall
Page 16 and 17:
6 Sunderland-Groves et al. 7 Conser
Page 18 and 19:
8 Sunderland-Groves et al. Europe,
Page 20 and 21: 10 Comiskey and Dallmeier 2 Challen
Page 22 and 23: 12 Comiskey and Dallmeier 5 Adaptiv
Page 24 and 25: 14 Comiskey and Dallmeier identifie
Page 26 and 27: 16 Comiskey and Dallmeier 5.4 Evalu
Page 28 and 29: 18 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of a
Page 30 and 31: 20 Sunderland et al. preliminary la
Page 32 and 33: 22 Sunderland et al. avoided protru
Page 34 and 35: 24 Sunderland et al. Table 2. Summa
Page 36 and 37: 26 Sunderland et al. lowland forest
Page 38 and 39: 28 Sunderland et al. impressive cat
Page 40 and 41: 30 Sunderland et al. Herbaceous flo
Page 42 and 43: 32 Sunderland et al. Table 3. Compa
Page 44 and 45: 34 Sunderland et al. 5.5 Economic P
Page 46 and 47: 36 Sunderland et al. Table 5. Summa
Page 48 and 49: 38 Sunderland et al. monitoring pro
Page 50 and 51: 40 Sunderland et al. Letouzey, R. 1
Page 52 and 53: 42 Sunderland et al. Appendix 1. Pl
Page 54 and 55: 44 Sunderland et al. Agelaea pentag
Page 56 and 57: 46 Sunderland et al. Afzelia pachyl
Page 58 and 59: 48 Sunderland et al. Rhabdophyllum
Page 60 and 61: 50 Sunderland et al. Aningeria robu
Page 62 and 63: 52 Sunderland et al. Nervilia sp. P
Page 64 and 65: 54 Sunderland et al. g—2˜— @y
Page 66 and 67: 56 O’Kah f22 y2@w—˜A g—22@IE
Page 68 and 69: 58 O’Kah Table 3. Species found i
Page 72 and 73: 62 O’Kah Larsen, T. B. 1997. Butt
Page 74 and 75: 64 O’Kah Appendix 1 (cont.). Chec
Page 76 and 77: 66 O’Kah Appendix 1 (cont.). Chec
Page 78 and 79: 68 O’Kah Species distribution Tak
Page 80 and 81: 70 O’Kah Species distribution Tak
Page 82 and 83: 72 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of a
Page 84 and 85: 74 h—2@y——A 2 IE2— y2@w—
Page 86 and 87: 76 The sites which have been survey
Page 88 and 89: 78 species from a phylogenetic poin
Page 90 and 91: 80 Appendix 1. Species list and sam
Page 92 and 93: 82 Family / Species Notes Locations
Page 94 and 95: 84 LeBreton et al. 3 Methods A team
Page 96 and 97: 86 LeBreton et al. Bothrolycus ater
Page 98 and 99: 88 LeBreton et al. an important par
Page 100 and 101: 90 LeBreton et al. Perret, J.-L. 19
Page 102 and 103: 92 LeBreton et al. Appendix 1 (cont
Page 104 and 105: 94 LeBreton et al. Appendix 1 (cont
Page 106 and 107: 96 Languy and Motombe f 5 q—2˜
Page 108 and 109: 98 Languy and Motombe Table 3. Thre
Page 110 and 111: 100 Languy and Motombe encroachment
Page 112 and 113: 102 Languy and Motombe Appendix 1.
Page 114 and 115: 104 Languy and Motombe Appendix 1 (
Page 120 and 121:
110 Languy and Motombe Appendix 1 (
Page 122 and 123:
112 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels h
Page 124 and 125:
114 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels T
Page 126 and 127:
116 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels T
Page 128 and 129:
118 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels B
Page 130 and 131:
120 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels S
Page 132 and 133:
122 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels A
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
128 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of
Page 140 and 141:
130 Sunderland-Groves et al. In mor
Page 142 and 143:
132 Sunderland-Groves et al. proved
Page 144 and 145:
134 Sunderland-Groves et al. q—2
Page 146 and 147:
136 Sunderland-Groves et al. Table
Page 148 and 149:
138 Sunderland-Groves et al. from m
Page 150 and 151:
140 Sunderland-Groves et al. Sander
Page 152 and 153:
142 Mdaihli et al. Basin and is sep
Page 154 and 155:
144 Table 1. Type and number of fis
Page 156 and 157:
146 Migrating Labeo spp. make up 10
Page 158 and 159:
148 Mdaihli et al. Mochokidae Barbu
Page 160 and 161:
150 Monthly yield (t) 200 160 120 8
Page 162 and 163:
152 Mdaihli et al. of Forests Aroun
Page 164 and 165:
154 Mdaihli et al. Appendix 1 (cont
Page 166 and 167:
156 Sunderland et al. Table 1. Majo
Page 168 and 169:
158 Sunderland et al. resources and
Page 170 and 171:
160 Sunderland et al. No. of indivi
Page 172 and 173:
No. of individuals (n = 315) 200 15
Page 174 and 175:
No. of individuals (n = 1065) 1000
Page 176 and 177:
Gnetum spp. Piper guineensis Site T
Page 178 and 179:
Resource Impacts of seasonality Ava
Page 180 and 181:
Box. Large-scale exploitation of no
Page 182 and 183:
Sunderland, T. C. H. 2001. Cross Ri
Page 184 and 185:
174 Slayback 7 H S IH type of autom
Page 186 and 187:
176 Slayback (ridge or lowland). On
Page 188 and 189:
178 Slayback Table 2: Areas of outp
Page 190 and 191:
180 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of
Page 192:
182 Sunderland-Groves et al. Mone F
show all

Fisheries in the Southern Border Zone of Takamanda - Impact ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?