Fisheries in the Southern Border Zone of Takamanda - Impact ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

134 Sunderland-Groves et al. q—2—2g— h˜ G g q— y2@w—˜A H S IH u In the lowlands, gorilla and chimpanzee signs were found at one site—Makone River east. Although this was classified as a lowland site (
Gorilla and Chimp Surveys Table 2. Ape nests: Summary of all data both off and on transects, Takamanda Forest Reserve, Cameroon, 1999 and 2001 (1999: L=136 km; 2001: L=28 km) Year Species 1999 Gorilla gorilla deihli Pan troglodytes vellerosus 2001 Gorilla gorilla deihli Pan troglodytes vellerosus Total # nest groups rate for tree-only nest groups was found to be higher in both the Obonyi 1 hills and the Basho hills than in the lowland forests of Makone east, once more indicating that apes were found more frequently in the higher altitude areas. We assigned about 74% of these tree-only nests to chimpanzees. Although the sample size was small, a very rough estimate of ape density was made for the highlands and the lowlands following the Tutin and Fernandez (1984) formula and their suggested correction factor (Tutin et al. 1995). In the highland areas, gorilla density was calculated between 1.2 and 1.8 individuals/km², while chimpanzee density was 0.93 to 1.40 individuals/km². For the lowlands, gorilla density was 0.03 to 0.05/km², and chimpanzee density was 0.10 to 0.12/km². These are estimates with unknown precision because the sample size was so small. We therefore suggest that there was about one gorilla/km² and perhaps one chimpanzee/km² in the highlands, and almost no gorillas and fewer than 0.1 chimpanzees/km² in the lowlands. 5.4 Ape Density Estimates 2000-2001 Mean Median group size group size Fifty-eight gorilla nest sites and 76 chimpanzee or treeonly nest sites were recorded during transect surveys and nest searches from September 2000 to August 2001. Eighteen gorilla nest sites and 15 chimpanzee or treeonly nest sites were recorded along 17 km of transect. # of nest groups seen from transects, all strata combined 135 Encounter rate of nest groups seen on transects (#/L) 12 3.00 2.5 9 0.066 49 2.73 2.0 30 0.221 58 3.45 2.5 18 0.642 76 2.86 2.5 15 0.536 Three of the areas surveyed were sampled twice, once in the dry season and once in the wet season, for a total of 28 observer-kms. When all nest data are considered, including nests that appeared to be from single individuals, mean group size and standard deviation for gorillas was 3.45 ± 3.52 (median 2.5), and mean chimpanzee (tree-only nests) was 2.86 ± 1.76 (median 2.5) (Table 2). Along transects, the encounter rate for gorilla nest groups and individual nests was higher at Obonyi 1 hills and Basho hills than at Takpe (Table 3). No gorilla nests were encountered in either Mblishe or Atolo during transect surveys, although gorilla nest sites were located in Atolo during nest searches. Additional gorilla nest sites were recorded on the east side of the Makile hill (Makone east). There were more chimpanzee (tree-only) nest sites recorded in the Obonyi I hills than at any other highland site (Table 4). Only one tree-only nest was observed in the Takpe hills along transects, but six additional chimpanzee nest sites were recorded during nest searches. Chimp (tree-only) nests were not recorded in the highland area close to Atolo. One chimp nest site was observed in the hills of Obonyi 3 and one close to the village of Umbuli, located on the Nigerian border. More tree-only nest sites were recorded on the east side of the Makile hill (Makone east). SI/MAB Series #8, 2003
Page 2 and 3:
Smithsonian Institution SI/MAB Biod
Page 4 and 5:
ii 10. Fisheries in the Southern Bo
Page 6 and 7:
Mercy Abwe Dione Dept. of Biology,
Page 8 and 9:
The Smithsonian Institution has lon
Page 10 and 11:
The editors of this publication ext
Page 12 and 13:
2 Sunderland-Groves et al. Figure 1
Page 14 and 15:
4 Sunderland-Groves et al. Rainfall
Page 16 and 17:
6 Sunderland-Groves et al. 7 Conser
Page 18 and 19:
8 Sunderland-Groves et al. Europe,
Page 20 and 21:
10 Comiskey and Dallmeier 2 Challen
Page 22 and 23:
12 Comiskey and Dallmeier 5 Adaptiv
Page 24 and 25:
14 Comiskey and Dallmeier identifie
Page 26 and 27:
16 Comiskey and Dallmeier 5.4 Evalu
Page 28 and 29:
18 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of a
Page 30 and 31:
20 Sunderland et al. preliminary la
Page 32 and 33:
22 Sunderland et al. avoided protru
Page 34 and 35:
24 Sunderland et al. Table 2. Summa
Page 36 and 37:
26 Sunderland et al. lowland forest
Page 38 and 39:
28 Sunderland et al. impressive cat
Page 40 and 41:
30 Sunderland et al. Herbaceous flo
Page 42 and 43:
32 Sunderland et al. Table 3. Compa
Page 44 and 45:
34 Sunderland et al. 5.5 Economic P
Page 46 and 47:
36 Sunderland et al. Table 5. Summa
Page 48 and 49:
38 Sunderland et al. monitoring pro
Page 50 and 51:
40 Sunderland et al. Letouzey, R. 1
Page 52 and 53:
42 Sunderland et al. Appendix 1. Pl
Page 54 and 55:
44 Sunderland et al. Agelaea pentag
Page 56 and 57:
46 Sunderland et al. Afzelia pachyl
Page 58 and 59:
48 Sunderland et al. Rhabdophyllum
Page 60 and 61:
50 Sunderland et al. Aningeria robu
Page 62 and 63:
52 Sunderland et al. Nervilia sp. P
Page 64 and 65:
54 Sunderland et al. g—2˜— @y
Page 66 and 67:
56 O’Kah f22 y2@w—˜A g—22@IE
Page 68 and 69:
58 O’Kah Table 3. Species found i
Page 70 and 71:
60 O’Kah Table 6. Indicators of s
Page 72 and 73:
62 O’Kah Larsen, T. B. 1997. Butt
Page 74 and 75:
64 O’Kah Appendix 1 (cont.). Chec
Page 76 and 77:
66 O’Kah Appendix 1 (cont.). Chec
Page 78 and 79:
68 O’Kah Species distribution Tak
Page 80 and 81:
70 O’Kah Species distribution Tak
Page 82 and 83:
72 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of a
Page 84 and 85:
74 h—2@y——A 2 IE2— y2@w—
Page 86 and 87:
76 The sites which have been survey
Page 88 and 89:
78 species from a phylogenetic poin
Page 90 and 91:
80 Appendix 1. Species list and sam
Page 92 and 93:
82 Family / Species Notes Locations
Page 94 and 95: 84 LeBreton et al. 3 Methods A team
Page 96 and 97: 86 LeBreton et al. Bothrolycus ater
Page 98 and 99: 88 LeBreton et al. an important par
Page 100 and 101: 90 LeBreton et al. Perret, J.-L. 19
Page 102 and 103: 92 LeBreton et al. Appendix 1 (cont
Page 104 and 105: 94 LeBreton et al. Appendix 1 (cont
Page 106 and 107: 96 Languy and Motombe f 5 q—2˜
Page 108 and 109: 98 Languy and Motombe Table 3. Thre
Page 110 and 111: 100 Languy and Motombe encroachment
Page 112 and 113: 102 Languy and Motombe Appendix 1.
Page 114 and 115: 104 Languy and Motombe Appendix 1 (
Page 122 and 123: 112 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels h
Page 124 and 125: 114 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels T
Page 126 and 127: 116 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels T
Page 128 and 129: 118 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels B
Page 130 and 131: 120 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels S
Page 132 and 133: 122 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels A
Page 138 and 139: 128 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of
Page 140 and 141: 130 Sunderland-Groves et al. In mor
Page 142 and 143: 132 Sunderland-Groves et al. proved
Page 146 and 147: 136 Sunderland-Groves et al. Table
Page 148 and 149: 138 Sunderland-Groves et al. from m
Page 150 and 151: 140 Sunderland-Groves et al. Sander
Page 152 and 153: 142 Mdaihli et al. Basin and is sep
Page 154 and 155: 144 Table 1. Type and number of fis
Page 156 and 157: 146 Migrating Labeo spp. make up 10
Page 158 and 159: 148 Mdaihli et al. Mochokidae Barbu
Page 160 and 161: 150 Monthly yield (t) 200 160 120 8
Page 162 and 163: 152 Mdaihli et al. of Forests Aroun
Page 164 and 165: 154 Mdaihli et al. Appendix 1 (cont
Page 166 and 167: 156 Sunderland et al. Table 1. Majo
Page 168 and 169: 158 Sunderland et al. resources and
Page 170 and 171: 160 Sunderland et al. No. of indivi
Page 172 and 173: No. of individuals (n = 315) 200 15
Page 174 and 175: No. of individuals (n = 1065) 1000
Page 176 and 177: Gnetum spp. Piper guineensis Site T
Page 178 and 179: Resource Impacts of seasonality Ava
Page 180 and 181: Box. Large-scale exploitation of no
Page 182 and 183: Sunderland, T. C. H. 2001. Cross Ri
Page 184 and 185: 174 Slayback 7 H S IH type of autom
Page 186 and 187: 176 Slayback (ridge or lowland). On
Page 188 and 189: 178 Slayback Table 2: Areas of outp
Page 190 and 191: 180 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of
Page 192: 182 Sunderland-Groves et al. Mone F
show all

Fisheries in the Southern Border Zone of Takamanda - Impact ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?