Fisheries in the Southern Border Zone of Takamanda - Impact ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Gnetum spp. Piper guineensis Site Total no. of individuals Mean no. of individuals/ha Total no. of individuals Mean no. of individuals/ha Takamanda 86 21.5 42 10.5 Obonyi 1 181 45.25 33 8.25 Matene 0 0 16 3 Mfakwe 220 55 25.75 4 Mean (all sites) 121.75 30.4 103 6.45 the removal of bark strips (for example, Annickia chlorantha) may pose a threat to the individual, but likely not to the population or species as a whole (Table 11). In general, many NTFPs such as bush mango, njansang, bush onion, and bush pepper, where the impacts of harvesting are minimal, are not at immediate risk of being over-exploited, and there are few reports of increasing scarcity of these products. Destructive harvesting such as felling and removal of the individual is wholly unsustainable. In terms of conservation, over-exploitation is exacerbated when a species occurs in low densities or has a restricted natural distribution (for example, Garcinia mannii). As important, the removal of all mature individuals from an area poses a threat to local populations (for example, Carpolobia, Garcinia, and Randia). In such cases, the removal of reproductively mature individuals significantly impacts the regenerative potential of the population, which has considerable long-term effects on the capacity of the species to replace itself. Recent increases in the harvest of many NTFPs at TFR for export to Nigeria is evidence of significant local
Resource Life form Part Impact of Level of Sustainability harvested harvesting Bush mango Canopy-emergent Fruits Low Relatively sustainable, good regeneration tree and community-level cultivation Eru Woody liana Leaves Low to medium Relatively sustainable if leaves are to high plucked and the stem is not cut, but (depending on destructive unsustainable harvesting is technique) often undertaken Njansang Canopy-emergent Fruits Low Relatively sustainable, good regeneration tree and community-level “encouragement” Carpolobia cattle Small to medium Stems High Highly unsustainable because of removal sticks tree of whole stem, including root collar Garcinia chewing Medium to large Bole High Highly unsustainable; species has limited stick tree geographical range and is in danger of extinction over the long term Randia chewing Small to medium Stems High Highly unsustainable; population stick tree beginning a significant decline Njabe Canopy-emergent Fruits (more Low to high Relatively sustainable if harvested for tree commonly fruits, but unsustainable is harvested for timber) timber Bush pepper Climbing Leaves and Moderate Relatively sustainable if leaves and fruits fruits are plucked and the stem is not cut Rattan canes Climbing palms Mature stems Low to medium Relatively sustainable at current levels of harvest scarcity of these resources in that country (Sunderland 2001), a situation that is largely determining, and exacerbating, the current unsustainable harvest of many NTFPs discussed in this paper. For example, harvest of Carpolobia stems is wholly unsustainable. These stems are cut below the swollen root collar to capture natural “handles” for the cattle sticks. The damage is so great that there is little or no prospect of regeneration through re-shooting, or coppicing. Coupled with this, the individuals preferred for harvest are adolescents (dbh of 4-6cm); hence, many Carpolobia stems are removed before reaching reproductive maturity. The loss of these immature individuals seriously affects the population’s long-term potential for recruitment through seed production. In the Kajifu area, Carpolobia no longer exists because of this practice. In addition, both harvesters and traders report that Randia is becoming increasingly scarce in the Reserve. Harvesters must travel farther and farther into the bush to find mature stems. While the species is still relatively common, destructive harvesting is leading to a serious population decline. 4.9.2 The effects of seasonality on NTFP activities While many non-timber forest products are available for harvest and sale all year, some are somewhat seasonal, and the economic cycle for many communities relies heavily on the timing of these resources (Table 12). The effects of seasonality are particularly pronounced for bush mango and other fruit-producing species and have significant implications for household budgets.
Page 2 and 3:
Smithsonian Institution SI/MAB Biod
Page 4 and 5:
ii 10. Fisheries in the Southern Bo
Page 6 and 7:
Mercy Abwe Dione Dept. of Biology,
Page 8 and 9:
The Smithsonian Institution has lon
Page 10 and 11:
The editors of this publication ext
Page 12 and 13:
2 Sunderland-Groves et al. Figure 1
Page 14 and 15:
4 Sunderland-Groves et al. Rainfall
Page 16 and 17:
6 Sunderland-Groves et al. 7 Conser
Page 18 and 19:
8 Sunderland-Groves et al. Europe,
Page 20 and 21:
10 Comiskey and Dallmeier 2 Challen
Page 22 and 23:
12 Comiskey and Dallmeier 5 Adaptiv
Page 24 and 25:
14 Comiskey and Dallmeier identifie
Page 26 and 27:
16 Comiskey and Dallmeier 5.4 Evalu
Page 28 and 29:
18 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of a
Page 30 and 31:
20 Sunderland et al. preliminary la
Page 32 and 33:
22 Sunderland et al. avoided protru
Page 34 and 35:
24 Sunderland et al. Table 2. Summa
Page 36 and 37:
26 Sunderland et al. lowland forest
Page 38 and 39:
28 Sunderland et al. impressive cat
Page 40 and 41:
30 Sunderland et al. Herbaceous flo
Page 42 and 43:
32 Sunderland et al. Table 3. Compa
Page 44 and 45:
34 Sunderland et al. 5.5 Economic P
Page 46 and 47:
36 Sunderland et al. Table 5. Summa
Page 48 and 49:
38 Sunderland et al. monitoring pro
Page 50 and 51:
40 Sunderland et al. Letouzey, R. 1
Page 52 and 53:
42 Sunderland et al. Appendix 1. Pl
Page 54 and 55:
44 Sunderland et al. Agelaea pentag
Page 56 and 57:
46 Sunderland et al. Afzelia pachyl
Page 58 and 59:
48 Sunderland et al. Rhabdophyllum
Page 60 and 61:
50 Sunderland et al. Aningeria robu
Page 62 and 63:
52 Sunderland et al. Nervilia sp. P
Page 64 and 65:
54 Sunderland et al. g—2˜— @y
Page 66 and 67:
56 O’Kah f22 y2@w—˜A g—22@IE
Page 68 and 69:
58 O’Kah Table 3. Species found i
Page 70 and 71:
60 O’Kah Table 6. Indicators of s
Page 72 and 73:
62 O’Kah Larsen, T. B. 1997. Butt
Page 74 and 75:
64 O’Kah Appendix 1 (cont.). Chec
Page 76 and 77:
66 O’Kah Appendix 1 (cont.). Chec
Page 78 and 79:
68 O’Kah Species distribution Tak
Page 80 and 81:
70 O’Kah Species distribution Tak
Page 82 and 83:
72 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of a
Page 84 and 85:
74 h—2@y——A 2 IE2— y2@w—
Page 86 and 87:
76 The sites which have been survey
Page 88 and 89:
78 species from a phylogenetic poin
Page 90 and 91:
80 Appendix 1. Species list and sam
Page 92 and 93:
82 Family / Species Notes Locations
Page 94 and 95:
84 LeBreton et al. 3 Methods A team
Page 96 and 97:
86 LeBreton et al. Bothrolycus ater
Page 98 and 99:
88 LeBreton et al. an important par
Page 100 and 101:
90 LeBreton et al. Perret, J.-L. 19
Page 102 and 103:
92 LeBreton et al. Appendix 1 (cont
Page 104 and 105:
94 LeBreton et al. Appendix 1 (cont
Page 106 and 107:
96 Languy and Motombe f 5 q—2˜
Page 108 and 109:
98 Languy and Motombe Table 3. Thre
Page 110 and 111:
100 Languy and Motombe encroachment
Page 112 and 113:
102 Languy and Motombe Appendix 1.
Page 114 and 115:
104 Languy and Motombe Appendix 1 (
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
112 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels h
Page 124 and 125:
114 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels T
Page 126 and 127: 116 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels T
Page 128 and 129: 118 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels B
Page 130 and 131: 120 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels S
Page 132 and 133: 122 Sunderland-Groves and Maisels A
Page 138 and 139: 128 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of
Page 140 and 141: 130 Sunderland-Groves et al. In mor
Page 142 and 143: 132 Sunderland-Groves et al. proved
Page 144 and 145: 134 Sunderland-Groves et al. q—2
Page 146 and 147: 136 Sunderland-Groves et al. Table
Page 148 and 149: 138 Sunderland-Groves et al. from m
Page 150 and 151: 140 Sunderland-Groves et al. Sander
Page 152 and 153: 142 Mdaihli et al. Basin and is sep
Page 154 and 155: 144 Table 1. Type and number of fis
Page 156 and 157: 146 Migrating Labeo spp. make up 10
Page 158 and 159: 148 Mdaihli et al. Mochokidae Barbu
Page 160 and 161: 150 Monthly yield (t) 200 160 120 8
Page 162 and 163: 152 Mdaihli et al. of Forests Aroun
Page 164 and 165: 154 Mdaihli et al. Appendix 1 (cont
Page 166 and 167: 156 Sunderland et al. Table 1. Majo
Page 168 and 169: 158 Sunderland et al. resources and
Page 170 and 171: 160 Sunderland et al. No. of indivi
Page 172 and 173: No. of individuals (n = 315) 200 15
Page 174 and 175: No. of individuals (n = 1065) 1000
Page 178 and 179: Resource Impacts of seasonality Ava
Page 180 and 181: Box. Large-scale exploitation of no
Page 182 and 183: Sunderland, T. C. H. 2001. Cross Ri
Page 184 and 185: 174 Slayback 7 H S IH type of autom
Page 186 and 187: 176 Slayback (ridge or lowland). On
Page 188 and 189: 178 Slayback Table 2: Areas of outp
Page 190 and 191: 180 Takamanda: the Biodiversity of
Page 192: 182 Sunderland-Groves et al. Mone F
show all

Fisheries in the Southern Border Zone of Takamanda - Impact ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?