15.07.2013 Views

1 The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign ...

1 The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign ...

1 The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

president.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Association</strong> of Entrepreneurs was an outgrowth of Soviet economic leaders who in<br />

the new Ukraine, post Soviet Ukraine, was advancing the interests of the red directors.<br />

This group of red directors became the most powerful Ukrainian political group, both<br />

behind the scenes <strong>and</strong> of record from 1991 through, I'd say, about 1997, when the<br />

oligarchs took over the leadership. Some oligarchs were <strong>for</strong>mer red directors, but the new<br />

era, capitalist oligarchs as a whole are characterized by having far more experience <strong>and</strong><br />

use of, the new economy <strong>and</strong> banks. <strong>The</strong> oligarchs created new networks of banks <strong>and</strong><br />

other economic institutions, to support the acquisition of further assets. <strong>The</strong> oligarchs’<br />

objective was personal wealth accumulation. <strong>The</strong> oligarchs concentrated to great effect,<br />

accumulating money by acquiring state assets <strong>and</strong> using that first level of acquisition as<br />

leverage to make even more money.<br />

Q: Was that money going anywhere else, or to Swiss bank accounts?<br />

MILLER: Yes, it was going wherever money would produce the most return. <strong>The</strong>y were<br />

bright, <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>med themselves about where to go to the place where they would get the<br />

most money, particularly <strong>for</strong> themselves.<br />

Q: So this was not a matter of reinvestment.<br />

MILLER: It was not reinvestment, it was self aggr<strong>and</strong>izement.<br />

[END SIDE]<br />

Q: You were saying it was interesting …<br />

MILLER: How ready the red directors were when they became oligarchs, to shed the<br />

Soviet legacy of support <strong>for</strong> workers. <strong>The</strong>y shed the burden of infrastructure support <strong>for</strong><br />

workers – the hospitals, the kindergartens, the schools, the cultural centers, social<br />

infrastructure, the part of the typical Soviet industrial complex, which included the<br />

building <strong>and</strong> maintenance of apartment houses, playgrounds, movie theaters, clinics. <strong>The</strong><br />

work place took care of its workers from birth to death, including burials. <strong>The</strong> Soviet<br />

place of work provided that kind of all-inclusive security. With a new “free market”<br />

system they shed those obligations <strong>and</strong> became bottom line efficient <strong>and</strong> left the workers<br />

adrift. <strong>The</strong>se features of economic transition, accounts <strong>for</strong> some of the discontent on the<br />

part of most Ukrainians.<br />

Let’s return to Kuchma. Kuchma, as the president of the red directors <strong>Association</strong> of<br />

Entrepreneurs, used that as plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> his political base. It was his political base. In<br />

1994, he ran <strong>for</strong> president against Kravchuk, Leonid Kravchuk, the first president who<br />

had been a second-level nomenclatura. Kuchma had been higher in Soviet rank <strong>and</strong><br />

higher in the esteem of the populace than Kravchuk, <strong>and</strong> this Soviet qualitative difference<br />

had an effect on the outcome of the elections. Also, Kravchuk was a decided <strong>and</strong> overt<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!