London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Future Actions Table 7.1: Summary of Future Actions, Priorities, Timeframes and Parties Recommendations / Future Actions Priority/ Timeframes 1 Theme 1: Data Improvement 1 Develop a data improvement programme for C&I wastes in London. This should build on the national C&I waste survey data but provide more compositional detail about those sectors where least information is available. The programme should include targeted surveys of commercial wastes that are currently described as ‘general’ and on industrial wastes to provide more information about the breakdown and quantities. Due consideration should be made as to how waste management companies could provide data on commercial and industrial wastes handled by customer type, customer size and composition. NB this links with Actions 5-8 in the Mayor’s Municipal Waste Strategy – relating to waste data reporting . 2 Carry out a survey of C&D wastes in London to provide more robust data than is currently available from the national C&D survey. The survey should include all C&D waste materials (including soft C&D wastes) and provide more information about the composition of the separate construction and demolition waste streams. 3 Monitor the number of consented hazardous waste landfill sites that become available for use – in July 2004. NB this links with Action 82 in the Mayor’s Municipal Waste Strategy – relating to planning the waste infrastructure in London. 4 Carry out an investigation into the additional types and quantities of hazardous wastes that will be generated as a result of the implementation of the new hazardous waste regulations – expected in July 2005. Use this information (with the output from action 5) in the development of a strategy to make London more self sufficient in hazardous waste processing. 5 Approach the Environment Agency for access to their inhouse database which provides information about the onsite processing of hazardous wastes in London. Use this information (with the output from action 4) in the development of a strategy to make London more selfsufficient in hazardous waste processing. 6 Consideration should be given to the future opportunities that exist to improve the gathering of C&I and C&D waste 136 Responsible Organisations Key GLA, EA, LDA Key GLA, ICE, BRE Key EA,GLA Short GLA, Hazardous Waste Forum, EA Short GLA, EA Medium GLA, EA, Trade Associations
data, including discussions with Trade Associations and the Environment Agency with regard to incorporating into licensing requirements. Theme 2: Lobbying of Government (policy, guidance or legislation changes) 1 A number of Development Planning issues should be considered: • Competition with housing for waterside development • Identification of land for waste management • Inclusion of Demolition Protocol in planning guidance / UDPs • Consideration of transportation by rail or water NB this links with Actions 82 & 83 in the Mayor’s Municipal Waste Strategy – relating to Planning for Waste Infrastructure. 2 Provide support to Transport for London in lobbying government to support the use of the river and canal network in London for waste transportation. NB this links with Actions 87 and 88 in the Mayor’s Municipal Waste Strategy – relating to the encouragement of sustainable waste transportation in London (including rail and water). 3 Provide support to British Waterways in their efforts to lobby Government to amend the regulations relating to Freight Facility Grants with respect to water and rail transportation. 4 Lobby Government to ensure the continued operation of the Envirowise programme for businesses and for its expansion to cover all commercial businesses and provide more detailed advice on waste management practice, particularly for SMEs. 5 Lobby Government, the Environment Agency and other relevant organisations with a view to improving access to clear and consistent advice on good practice in waste management, through the development of a single portal for waste management guidance information (possibly as part of the development of a single portal for wider environmental, health and safety guidance). 6 The Government should be lobbied in order to address the provision of commercial waste management facilities in London. 137 Associations Key GLA, ALG, LWA Key Transport for London, GLA, EA Short GLA, British Waterways Short GLA, Envirowise Medium GLA, Environment Council Medium GLA,EA
Page 1 and 2:
Policy & Partnerships London Wider
Page 3:
CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Waste
Page 6 and 7:
Chapter 2 summarises the principal
Page 8 and 9:
Key policy proposals in ‘Waste St
Page 10 and 11:
2.8. The national Planning Policy G
Page 12 and 13:
• where waste cannot be dealt wit
Page 14 and 15:
Policies of neighbouring regions 2.
Page 16 and 17:
• A Thematic Strategy on waste re
Page 18 and 19:
2.34. Legislation applying to speci
Page 20 and 21:
addresses eight main environmental
Page 22 and 23:
3.19. The London Regional Technical
Page 24 and 25:
4.3. There then follows a section o
Page 26 and 27:
Table 4.1: Arisings and basic compo
Page 28 and 29:
Table 4.3: Total commercial and ind
Page 30 and 31:
around London but not on the quanti
Page 32 and 33:
Table 4.6: Number and weight of sam
Page 34 and 35:
through a 20mm sieve Total 73 27.4
Page 36 and 37:
handling and transport in London, r
Page 38 and 39:
4.66. Not surprisingly, all of the
Page 40 and 41:
some construction companies had the
Page 42 and 43:
necessary that the waste producers
Page 44 and 45:
4.101. One other potential major in
Page 46 and 47:
SMEs comprise a slightly lower prop
Page 48 and 49:
Drivers for Sustainable Waste Manag
Page 50 and 51:
4.123. Whilst sustainable waste man
Page 52 and 53:
Encouragement of waste minimisation
Page 54 and 55:
companies. There is no service offe
Page 56 and 57:
their companies than the larger com
Page 58 and 59:
such as road construction, it close
Page 60 and 61:
LREs wishing to model the viability
Page 62 and 63:
Table 4.10: Eco-sites established w
Page 64 and 65:
• Support for the development and
Page 66 and 67:
two internationally recognised stan
Page 68 and 69:
London. A phased approach is recomm
Page 70 and 71:
encouraged, and that guidance and/o
Page 72 and 73:
number of employees of perhaps some
Page 74 and 75:
4.230. The NHS provided a detailed
Page 76 and 77:
4.241. For over half of the WCAs th
Page 78 and 79:
5. Construction and Demolition Wast
Page 80 and 81:
5.7. The findings for England and W
Page 82 and 83:
City Limits 5.14. An alternative re
Page 84 and 85:
Figure 5.1: Average total waste ari
Page 86 and 87:
5.23. The hazardous waste component
Page 88 and 89:
5.29. Nevertheless, the data estima
Page 90 and 91: Consultations 5.38. Consultations w
Page 92 and 93: to be so in to the future. However
Page 94 and 95: visit and review specific pages. A
Page 96 and 97: European Literature Review and Cons
Page 99 and 100: 6. Special/Hazardous Waste Introduc
Page 101 and 102: ‘Technical Assessment for Waste M
Page 103 and 104: accurate record of hazardous waste
Page 105 and 106: Figure 6.2: Breakdown of recorded h
Page 107 and 108: wastes to London are the closest, i
Page 109: Figure 6.4: Breakdown of hazardous
Page 112 and 113: 6.47. There are a range of views fr
Page 114 and 115: Table 6.5: In-house landfills which
Page 116 and 117: equirements for the ‘new’ hazar
Page 118 and 119: options to improve treatment, such
Page 120 and 121: 6.80. However, the new hazardous wa
Page 122 and 123: 6.90. The future treatment of asbes
Page 124 and 125: 7.7. London’s total hazardous was
Page 126 and 127: 7.19. There is only limited composi
Page 128 and 129: waste management obligations and be
Page 130 and 131: construction and demolition compani
Page 132 and 133: the precise amount of landfill capa
Page 134 and 135: R.14 In order to more effectively t
Page 136 and 137: R32 It is recommended that a reduct
Page 138 and 139: measurement of wastes from construc
Page 142 and 143: Theme 3: Support for Existing Initi
Page 144 and 145: for contaminated soils within Londo
Page 147 and 148: Appendix A: Waste policy and legisl
Page 149 and 150: • whole used tyres (from 2003);
Page 151 and 152: UK Policy The majority of UK waste
Page 153 and 154: • Requires consents to discharge
Page 155 and 156: • Prohibits certain types of wast
Page 157 and 158: Green Paper on PVC Key Features •
Page 159 and 160: Chris Searles, Searles Associates D
Page 161 and 162: Table C1. Data by Number (from Smal
Page 163 and 164: Appendix D: Results of Further Anal
Page 165 and 166: Total 100 598.8 70.7 423.4 29.8 178
Page 167 and 168: Appendix E: Local Authority C&I Col
Page 169 and 170: All of the respondents said that th
Page 171 and 172: proportion of waste collected from
Page 173 and 174: Finally, the authorities were asked
Page 175 and 176: The authorities were asked how the
Page 177 and 178: All authorities were asked how they
Page 179 and 180: Table E11: Do you expect to meet th
Page 181 and 182: Table E15: What is the situation re
Page 183 and 184: Appendix F: Consultees for Construc
Page 185 and 186: Appendix G: Policy, legislative and
Page 187 and 188: Measure Germany Denmark Belgium The
Page 189 and 190: Measure Germany Denmark Belgium The
show all

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?