19.07.2013 Views

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Drivers for Sustainable <strong>Waste</strong> Management Practices<br />

4.118. The following sections discuss drivers for sustainable waste management and aids to<br />

best practice. The Copenhagen <strong>Waste</strong> Management System is a successful example of<br />

achieving high recycling rates for C&I waste (see the information box below).<br />

Copenhagen <strong>Waste</strong> Management System<br />

In the early 1990s Copenhagen turned its waste management system around from a<br />

landfill dominated disposal system to a position where recycling rates of over 50%<br />

were being achieved with greatly reduced disposals to landfill. Denmark has a<br />

national ban on combustible waste going to landfill, accepting that incineration with<br />

energy recovery has a role to play in sustainable waste management. Denmark<br />

adopted a National <strong>Waste</strong> Plan last year, which gives guidelines and objectives for all<br />

the municipalities, and aims to reduce current levels of incineration by further<br />

increasing recycling rates.<br />

Commercial <strong>Waste</strong> Management<br />

An important aspect of Danish waste regulation is that one single authority<br />

(generally the municipality) has responsibility for both planning and implementation<br />

of waste management, thus enabling an efficient system of treatment and<br />

enforcement.<br />

The first waste plan (1990) outlined a system for commercial waste, which specified<br />

criteria for transport and treatment for each waste type, and introduced source<br />

separation as a basic strategy. <strong>Waste</strong> operators and facilities that met the criteria<br />

could then enter into a contract with the municipality and become a designated<br />

facility in Copenhagen. The municipality has responsibility for all waste produced by<br />

local businesses which are required to use the designated waste management<br />

facilities. The system is based on the principle that the polluter pays: the waste<br />

producer pays for the cost of collection and treatment directly to the contracted<br />

collection company or treatment plant.<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> producers, waste collectors and waste receiving enterprises must meet the<br />

criteria of the waste plan, including reporting electronically to the municipality on<br />

their activities, types and quantities of waste handled.<br />

The change in commercial waste management was implemented without major<br />

difficulties arising for the waste producers. Organisational rearrangements and<br />

provision of extra storage space for waste containers was necessary. The extra costs<br />

involved appeared to be covered by the savings on waste disposal achieved<br />

(according to a survey in 1994 of the economic impact on 700 companies involved,<br />

only 7% experienced cost increases.) As there is limited landfill capacity in Denmark<br />

the disposal cost of using this route has historically been expensive. Landfill prices<br />

in Denmark for 2002 were quoted in the UK <strong>Strategy</strong> Unit’s report 15 as<br />

approximately £13-21/tonne, with a landfill tax of £28/tonne.<br />

Success of the Copenhagen <strong>Waste</strong> Management System in reducing landfilling and<br />

achieving high recycling rates, is attributed to:<br />

• The municipal waste planning and regulation system.<br />

15 <strong>Waste</strong> not, Want not. A strategy for tackling the waste problem in England. <strong>Strategy</strong> Unit, November 2002.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!