19.07.2013 Views

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

encouraged, and that guidance and/or best practice references should be<br />

prepared, including the key performance indicators that companies should be<br />

reporting on. This may usefully also encompass sector-wide reporting in<br />

conjunction with trade associations, which should become statutory. The<br />

promotion of a web-based approach, perhaps along the lines of<br />

www.capitalwastefacts.com, may be an appropriate way of reporting headline<br />

indicators.<br />

4.216. It is noted that the <strong>London</strong> Stock Exchange is preparing to create a centralised database<br />

on the social and environmental performance of companies<br />

(www.ethicalperformance.com).<br />

Recommendation 28: It is recommended that discussions be held with the Stock<br />

Exchange to explore the possibilities of using their centralised database on the<br />

social and environmental performance of companies as part of the <strong>Wider</strong> <strong>Waste</strong><br />

<strong>Strategy</strong>.<br />

Further Analysis of C&I Compositional Data<br />

4.217. With reference to the SWMAL report discussed earlier, it is evident that a large<br />

proportion of the commercial and industrial waste stream was described as general<br />

wastes. Further analysis of this waste stream was undertaken during the study using<br />

the compositional data provided in the SWAP report to try and reduce these unknowns.<br />

The detailed results of the analysis are presented in Appendix D, and summarised<br />

below.<br />

Commercial <strong>Waste</strong>s<br />

4.218. Within the commercial sector, paper and cardboard are very large waste streams that<br />

could be some 2.2 million tonnes/annum. This would account for over half of the<br />

commercial waste stream in <strong>London</strong> and 30% of the total commercial and industrial<br />

waste stream in <strong>London</strong>. Of this amount, over 80% is expected to be recyclable which<br />

equates to some 1.8 million tonnes per annum. Nevertheless, this still leaves an<br />

estimated 415,000 tonnes of non-recyclable paper and cardboard.<br />

4.219. Putrescibles are the next most significant waste stream within the commercial sector,<br />

accounting for an estimated 400,000 tonnes, of which nearly 300,000 tonnes are<br />

potentially compostable. Glass is the next largest waste stream, with all but 2,500<br />

tonnes of the estimated 372,000 tonnes total being recyclable, particularly given the<br />

current demand for glass. Plastic wastes are also significant, but in this case, the<br />

majority (222,000 tonnes) are thought to be non-recyclable compared to the 93,000<br />

tonnes which is estimated as recyclable.<br />

4.220. The remaining waste streams that were estimated in the tables in Appendix D for the<br />

commercial sector are all significant, albeit much lower than those highlighted above,<br />

since they are in the tens of thousand rather than hundreds of thousand tonnes.<br />

Hence, whilst the metals, textiles and other wastes are all considered important, they are<br />

of less importance than paper, cardboard, putrescibles, glass and plastic for these<br />

sectors. However, it is likely that the SWAP survey failed to identify one-off waste<br />

events due to the nature of the survey. These could be significant over the course of a<br />

year, but may well not be identified in a survey that is only undertaken four times in a<br />

year. This would include WEEE, including computers and associated equipment, white<br />

goods, office and hotel furniture, demolition and construction waste. These waste<br />

streams are identified in the Environment Agency’s <strong>Waste</strong> Benchmarking Tool and some<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!