19.07.2013 Views

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The authorities were asked how the figures provided had been determined. One UA confirmed<br />

that this was from weighbridge figures whilst two of the WDAs figures were from their own<br />

recent surveys and on WDA used both weighbridge and local survey. The remaining seven<br />

respondents (five UAs and one WDA) did not answer this question.<br />

In terms of the nature of the data held in terms of waste handling, the authorities, were asked<br />

three questions relating to whether they do or could break down the commercial and industrial<br />

waste arisings by customer type, customer size and composition. Their responses are<br />

summarised below.<br />

Table E8: Ability of responding UAs and WDAs to provide a breakdown of<br />

wastes that they handle by customer type, customer size and composition<br />

Can you provide a breakdown by: Customer<br />

type?<br />

Yes – this analysis is currently<br />

undertaken<br />

Yes – this analysis could be<br />

undertaken but is not at present<br />

No – data could not be broken down<br />

in this way<br />

customer<br />

size?<br />

by<br />

composition?<br />

0 0 0<br />

2 2 2<br />

8 8 8<br />

Totals 10 10 10<br />

Note: one respondent (UA) did not answer this question<br />

It can be seen from the above table that only two authorities could provide further information<br />

on customer type, size or composition, although this analysis is not currently undertaken.<br />

These were both UAs. The majority could not provide this breakdown.<br />

The authorities were then asked about their waste disposal facilities. They were asked how<br />

many new treatment and disposal facilities had been built and are operational within their<br />

<strong>Authority</strong> since 1986 (i.e. since the disbandment of the GLC). Seven of the respondents had<br />

no new waste disposal facilities (three UAs and all four WDAs). Just one UA had a new facility<br />

which was a composting plant. Also, one UA mentioned a riverside transfer station that had<br />

been completely refurbished in this time. Two UAs did not answer this question.<br />

The authorities were also asked about what new treatment and disposal facilities are currently<br />

proposed within their boundaries. Five of the 11 respondents (four UAs and one WDA)<br />

confirmed that no new facilities were proposed and one UA did not answer this question. The<br />

facilities that are proposed are summarised below.<br />

Table E9: What new treatment and disposal facilities are currently proposed<br />

for the future within your boundaries?<br />

UA Anaerobic digestion plant<br />

UA A large PFI project to include specific treatment options<br />

WDA Composting plant<br />

WDA Four RRC and two MBT plants in construction<br />

WDA Draft joint waste strategy shows a requirement for: 3 MRFs, 3 composting<br />

plants, windrow capacity, MBT replacement facility for an energy recovery<br />

plant<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!