19.07.2013 Views

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2016 3 3<br />

2027 1 1<br />

2032 1 1<br />

Totals 9 3 12<br />

Notes:<br />

1. Excludes reply from one WDA which is discussed separately below.<br />

2. Respondent put 2003/5 in their answer<br />

The WDA that is not divested and not included in the above table uses 15 individual contracts<br />

with 10 private companies: Shanks <strong>Waste</strong> Services Ltd, <strong>Waste</strong> Recycling Group Ltd, English,<br />

Welsh and Scottish Railways Ltd, Surrey <strong>Waste</strong> Management Ltd, Generay Ltd, McGovern Bros<br />

(Haulage) Ltd, Powerday Ltd, Ace <strong>Waste</strong> Ltd, Car Spares of West Drayton Ltd and Technowaste<br />

Ltd. Four of these had contract renewal dates between 2007 and 2009, three were annual<br />

contracts and the remaining eight were roll over contracts.<br />

All of the respondents plan to continue using their current services for the future handling and<br />

disposal of commercial wastes. However, the one WDA that is not divested noted that in the<br />

long-term it expects to enter into a single long-term contract because of the joint waste<br />

strategy being produced with the constituent WCAs due to the capital investment requirements.<br />

The authorities were then asked how commercial and industrial wastes are handled. Eight of<br />

the eleven respondents (six UAs and two WDAs) handle commercial and industrial wastes<br />

always mixed with other wastes. One of the WDAs commented that this answer did not quite<br />

fit how they handle fridges and end of life vehicles. The remaining four authorities (one UA<br />

and two WDAs) sometimes or usually mixed commercial and industrial wastes with other waste<br />

streams.<br />

We then asked the authorities about the way that they transport commercial and industrial<br />

wastes. Five authorities (three UAs and one WDA) use exclusively diesel fuelled lorries. Three<br />

of the authorities (one UA and two WDAs) use exclusively river transport. One UA used a<br />

mixture of predominately diesel fuelled lorries (>76%) with between 6-25% by boat. The final<br />

respondent (WDA) had between 51-75% by rail and 26-50% by diesel fuelled lorry. One WDA<br />

did not answer this question.<br />

We asked the authorities to provide information on the total tonnages of commercial and<br />

industrial wastes handled by or on behalf of the WDA and how much was from the WCAs and<br />

other sources. Three of the four WDAs answered this question. One WDA only receives<br />

commercial wastes from WCAs – a total of 690,426 tonnes. A second handles a total of<br />

213,000 tonnes, of which 130,000 tonnes were from WCAs and 83,000 tonnes from other<br />

sources. The third WDA handles a total of 32,500 commercial and industrial wastes but did not<br />

specify whether this was solely from WCAs or included other sources.<br />

With regard to the UA tonnages, it was assumed that they will dispose of all waste collected<br />

within their authority. Since they had been asked for this figure earlier (see waste collection<br />

section above), they were only asked if they handled commercial or industrial wastes received<br />

from sources other than the authority. One UA received 2,826 tonnes of commercial wastes<br />

from sources other than the authority. One UA wrote “unknown” which suggest that they do<br />

receive some wastes from other sources but did not provide any tonnages. Two of the UAs did<br />

not receive any wastes from non-authority sources. Three UAs did not answer this question.<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!