19.07.2013 Views

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

London Wider Waste Strategy - London - Greater London Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Finally, the authorities were asked if construction and demolition wastes are collected by or on<br />

behalf of the authority. Five respondents did not answer this question. Six of the authorities<br />

who did answer (four WCAs and two UAs) do not collect construction and demolition wastes.<br />

Of the seven authorities (four WCAs and three UAs) that did collect commercial and industrial<br />

wastes, six collected from residential properties, three from commercial sources and two from<br />

industrial.<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> Disposal<br />

All four of the waste disposal authorities (WDAs) responded to the questionnaire along with<br />

seven of the 12 unitary authorities. Therefore, the baseline for this part of survey on waste<br />

disposal is 11 authorities out of a total possible of 16.<br />

All but one of the respondents (i.e. 10) use external companies to manage the handling,<br />

treatment and disposal of commercial and industrial wastes on their behalf. The exception was<br />

one of WDA who is not divested and uses a number of approaches:<br />

• Operates three waste transfer stations itself with private sector haulage and<br />

disposal;<br />

• Uses private contractors for the removal and disposal of wastes from five civic<br />

amenity sites operated by WCAs<br />

• Directs some wastes to four private sector transfer stations; and,<br />

• Uses private sector contractor for industrial end of life vehicles.<br />

Eight of the respondents (five UAs and three WDAs) used a single contract to handle and<br />

dispose of commercial and industrial waste. Two of the UAs used two private companies.<br />

These 12 contracts were let to seven waste management companies, of which Cory<br />

Environmental Ltd had four contracts, SITA had two and one each for Cleanaway, Onxy, <strong>Waste</strong><br />

Recycling Group, <strong>London</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> Ltd and Shanks East <strong>London</strong>. The size of our sample is<br />

insufficient to confirm the overall trends, and whilst it does appear that Cory has the greatest<br />

number of contracts it is interesting that most of the major waste management companies do<br />

have at least one contract in <strong>London</strong>. There was a wide variety in contract dates<br />

Of the twelve private waste contracts, our sample returns suggests that the WDAs have longer<br />

term contracts in place as illustrated in Table E7.<br />

Table E7: Date of Renewal for Private <strong>Waste</strong> Handling and Disposal Contracts<br />

Date of Contract<br />

Renewal<br />

UA WDA 1 Total<br />

2004 2 2 2<br />

2005 1 1<br />

2008 1 1<br />

2009 1 1<br />

2014 1 1<br />

2015 1 1<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!