- Page 1 and 2:
Policy & Partnerships London Wider
- Page 3:
CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Waste
- Page 6 and 7:
Chapter 2 summarises the principal
- Page 8 and 9:
Key policy proposals in ‘Waste St
- Page 10 and 11:
2.8. The national Planning Policy G
- Page 12 and 13:
• where waste cannot be dealt wit
- Page 14 and 15:
Policies of neighbouring regions 2.
- Page 16 and 17:
• A Thematic Strategy on waste re
- Page 18 and 19:
2.34. Legislation applying to speci
- Page 20 and 21:
addresses eight main environmental
- Page 22 and 23:
3.19. The London Regional Technical
- Page 24 and 25:
4.3. There then follows a section o
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 4.1: Arisings and basic compo
- Page 28 and 29:
Table 4.3: Total commercial and ind
- Page 30 and 31:
around London but not on the quanti
- Page 32 and 33:
Table 4.6: Number and weight of sam
- Page 34 and 35:
through a 20mm sieve Total 73 27.4
- Page 36 and 37:
handling and transport in London, r
- Page 38 and 39:
4.66. Not surprisingly, all of the
- Page 40 and 41:
some construction companies had the
- Page 42 and 43:
necessary that the waste producers
- Page 44 and 45:
4.101. One other potential major in
- Page 46 and 47:
SMEs comprise a slightly lower prop
- Page 48 and 49:
Drivers for Sustainable Waste Manag
- Page 50 and 51:
4.123. Whilst sustainable waste man
- Page 52 and 53:
Encouragement of waste minimisation
- Page 54 and 55:
companies. There is no service offe
- Page 56 and 57:
their companies than the larger com
- Page 58 and 59:
such as road construction, it close
- Page 60 and 61:
LREs wishing to model the viability
- Page 62 and 63:
Table 4.10: Eco-sites established w
- Page 64 and 65:
• Support for the development and
- Page 66 and 67:
two internationally recognised stan
- Page 68 and 69:
London. A phased approach is recomm
- Page 70 and 71:
encouraged, and that guidance and/o
- Page 72 and 73:
number of employees of perhaps some
- Page 74 and 75:
4.230. The NHS provided a detailed
- Page 76 and 77:
4.241. For over half of the WCAs th
- Page 78 and 79:
5. Construction and Demolition Wast
- Page 80 and 81:
5.7. The findings for England and W
- Page 82 and 83:
City Limits 5.14. An alternative re
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 5.1: Average total waste ari
- Page 86 and 87:
5.23. The hazardous waste component
- Page 88 and 89:
5.29. Nevertheless, the data estima
- Page 90 and 91:
Consultations 5.38. Consultations w
- Page 92 and 93:
to be so in to the future. However
- Page 94 and 95:
visit and review specific pages. A
- Page 96 and 97:
European Literature Review and Cons
- Page 99 and 100:
6. Special/Hazardous Waste Introduc
- Page 101 and 102:
‘Technical Assessment for Waste M
- Page 103 and 104:
accurate record of hazardous waste
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 6.2: Breakdown of recorded h
- Page 107 and 108: wastes to London are the closest, i
- Page 109: Figure 6.4: Breakdown of hazardous
- Page 112 and 113: 6.47. There are a range of views fr
- Page 114 and 115: Table 6.5: In-house landfills which
- Page 116 and 117: equirements for the ‘new’ hazar
- Page 118 and 119: options to improve treatment, such
- Page 120 and 121: 6.80. However, the new hazardous wa
- Page 122 and 123: 6.90. The future treatment of asbes
- Page 124 and 125: 7.7. London’s total hazardous was
- Page 126 and 127: 7.19. There is only limited composi
- Page 128 and 129: waste management obligations and be
- Page 130 and 131: construction and demolition compani
- Page 132 and 133: the precise amount of landfill capa
- Page 134 and 135: R.14 In order to more effectively t
- Page 136 and 137: R32 It is recommended that a reduct
- Page 138 and 139: measurement of wastes from construc
- Page 140 and 141: Future Actions Table 7.1: Summary o
- Page 142 and 143: Theme 3: Support for Existing Initi
- Page 144 and 145: for contaminated soils within Londo
- Page 147 and 148: Appendix A: Waste policy and legisl
- Page 149 and 150: • whole used tyres (from 2003);
- Page 151 and 152: UK Policy The majority of UK waste
- Page 153 and 154: • Requires consents to discharge
- Page 155: • Prohibits certain types of wast
- Page 159 and 160: Chris Searles, Searles Associates D
- Page 161 and 162: Table C1. Data by Number (from Smal
- Page 163 and 164: Appendix D: Results of Further Anal
- Page 165 and 166: Total 100 598.8 70.7 423.4 29.8 178
- Page 167 and 168: Appendix E: Local Authority C&I Col
- Page 169 and 170: All of the respondents said that th
- Page 171 and 172: proportion of waste collected from
- Page 173 and 174: Finally, the authorities were asked
- Page 175 and 176: The authorities were asked how the
- Page 177 and 178: All authorities were asked how they
- Page 179 and 180: Table E11: Do you expect to meet th
- Page 181 and 182: Table E15: What is the situation re
- Page 183 and 184: Appendix F: Consultees for Construc
- Page 185 and 186: Appendix G: Policy, legislative and
- Page 187 and 188: Measure Germany Denmark Belgium The
- Page 189 and 190: Measure Germany Denmark Belgium The