20.07.2013 Views

Artic Home of the Aryans by Lokamanya Bal ... - Mandhata Global

Artic Home of the Aryans by Lokamanya Bal ... - Mandhata Global

Artic Home of the Aryans by Lokamanya Bal ... - Mandhata Global

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

195<br />

above, evidently an artificial division, and one, who reads carefully<br />

<strong>the</strong> description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se sacrifices, cannot fail to be struck <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that we have here a series <strong>of</strong> night-sacrifices from two to a hundred<br />

nights, or if we include <strong>the</strong> Ati-râtra in this series, we have practically<br />

a set <strong>of</strong> hundred nightly Soma sacrifices, though, according to <strong>the</strong><br />

principle <strong>of</strong> division adopted, some may fall under <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> Ahîna<br />

and some under that <strong>of</strong> Sattras.<br />

Now an important question in connection with <strong>the</strong>se Sattras is<br />

why <strong>the</strong>y alone should be designated “night-sacrifices” (râtri-kratus),<br />

or “night-sessions” (râtri-sattras)? and why <strong>the</strong>ir number should be<br />

one hundred? or, in o<strong>the</strong>r words, why <strong>the</strong>re are no night-sattras <strong>of</strong><br />

longer duration than one hundred nights? The Mîmâmsakas answer<br />

<strong>the</strong> first part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> question <strong>by</strong> asking us to believe that <strong>the</strong> word<br />

“night” (râtrih) is really used to denote a day in <strong>the</strong> denomination <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se sacrifices (Shabara on Jaimini VIII, 1, 17). The word dvi-râtra<br />

according to this <strong>the</strong>ory means two days’ sacrifice, and shata-râtra a<br />

hundred days’ sacrifice. This, explanation appears very good at <strong>the</strong><br />

first sight, and as a matter <strong>of</strong> fact it has been accepted <strong>by</strong> all writers<br />

on <strong>the</strong> sacrificial ceremonies. In support <strong>of</strong> it, we may also cite <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that as <strong>the</strong> moon was <strong>the</strong> measurer <strong>of</strong> time in ancient days, <strong>the</strong><br />

night was <strong>the</strong>n naturally more marked <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> day, and instead <strong>of</strong><br />

saying “so many days” men <strong>of</strong>ten spoke <strong>of</strong> “so many nights,” much in<br />

<strong>the</strong> same way as we now use <strong>the</strong> word “fort-night.” This is no doubt<br />

good so far as it goes; but <strong>the</strong> question is why should <strong>the</strong>re be no<br />

Soma sacrifices <strong>of</strong> a longer duration than one hundred nights? and,<br />

why a gap, a serious gap, is left in <strong>the</strong> series <strong>of</strong> Soma sacrifices after<br />

one hundred nights Sattra until we come to <strong>the</strong> annual Sattra <strong>of</strong> 360<br />

days? Admitting that “night” means “day,” we have Soma sacrifices<br />

lasting from 1 to 100 days; and if so where was <strong>the</strong> harm to complete<br />

<strong>the</strong> series until <strong>the</strong> yearly Sattra <strong>of</strong> 360 days was reached? So far as I<br />

know, no writer on sacrificial ceremonies has attempted to answer<br />

this question satisfactorily. Of course adopting <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!