30.07.2013 Views

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In general country-specific TOW values are comparable to <strong>the</strong> TOW data calculated by <strong>the</strong> default<br />

method when adjusted for industrial contribution, <strong>the</strong> uncertainty levels taken into account.<br />

2. Comparison of country-specific Gross emission of methane with <strong>the</strong> Check method and <strong>the</strong> default IPCC<br />

method (cf. Annex 3.E)<br />

The IPCC GPG provides a check method for calculating <strong>the</strong> CH 4 emission from domestic wastewater.<br />

The check method is based on default values (GPG, Box 5.1), where <strong>the</strong> only input parameter<br />

is <strong>the</strong> population of <strong>the</strong> country. The result of <strong>the</strong> check method is used as reference for <strong>the</strong> two<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r methods for <strong>the</strong> purpose of quality assurance and validity assistance. Results are given in<br />

Table 8.20.<br />

Table 8.20 Annual CH 4 emissions based on <strong>the</strong> check method and <strong>the</strong> country specific method for CH 4 gross<br />

emissions.<br />

Year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

Population (1000) 5140 5153 5170 5188 5208 5228 5248 5268 5287 5305 5322 5338 5351 5383<br />

CH emissions (Gg)<br />

4<br />

Check method<br />

27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.5 27.6 27.7 27.8 27.9 28.0 28.1 28.1 28.3<br />

CH emissions (Gg)<br />

4<br />

Country-specific 18.0 18.3 18.7 19.0 19.3 19.6 20.0 20.3 20.6 20.9 21.2 21.6 21.9 22.9<br />

According to Table 8.20 <strong>the</strong> gross emission is ranging from approximately 27 to 28 Gg per year.<br />

The default fraction of organic matter that degrades anaerobic is too high, i.e. 0.8, whereas 0.2-0.4<br />

is more realistic according to national data (cf. Table 8.16). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> check method<br />

does not account for industry influent load that reached 42 % in 2003. The two above aspects influence<br />

<strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> emission in opposite directions, which results in <strong>the</strong> highest similarity to <strong>the</strong><br />

late year country-specific emission level (cf. Annex 3).<br />

Overall <strong>the</strong> check method is a good way of verifying <strong>the</strong> correctness of <strong>the</strong> units, activity data and<br />

EF used in <strong>the</strong> country-specific calculations.<br />

Nitrous oxide emissions<br />

As <strong>the</strong>re are no check method given in <strong>the</strong> IPCC and <strong>the</strong> emission estimated is based on standard<br />

data on population, protein intake and default or constant emission factors not influenced by<br />

changed in <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong> activity data, <strong>the</strong>se calculations are more or less straightforward.<br />

The methodology for calculating <strong>the</strong> direct emission should be fur<strong>the</strong>r evaluated when more data<br />

becomes available.<br />

For details regarding source-specific QA/QC and verification see Annex 3.E.<br />

8.3.6 Recalculations<br />

The emissions from wastewater handling were previously reported as zero. The methodology<br />

used for <strong>the</strong> CRF Source Category 6B for CH and N O emissions is included for <strong>the</strong> first time in<br />

4 2<br />

this submission.<br />

8.3.7 Planned improvements<br />

Improvements in <strong>the</strong> calculation of <strong>the</strong> maximum methane producing potential with focus on disaggregation<br />

into sewage and sludge treatment processes will be investigated. Improvements in<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!