30.07.2013 Views

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.4 Recalculations, incl. in response to <strong>the</strong> review process, and planned<br />

improvement to <strong>the</strong> inventory<br />

The review process following several years of submissions, and <strong>the</strong> review reports have been very<br />

valuable for <strong>the</strong> improvements made and <strong>the</strong> recalculations performed. The final outcome of <strong>the</strong><br />

most recent review process on <strong>the</strong> 2004 submissions is <strong>the</strong> review report available as<br />

http://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/annex_i_ghg_inventories/inventory_review_reports/ap<br />

plication/pdf/2004_irr_centralized_review_denmark.pdf<br />

This review was a centralised review. The review team met on October 18-22, 2004. The draft report<br />

was available to us January 24, <strong>2005</strong>. The review report referred to above is dated March 23,<br />

<strong>2005</strong>.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> review process for <strong>the</strong> 2004 submissions we answered questions raised by <strong>the</strong> review team<br />

and we wrote a note with comments to <strong>the</strong> draft version of <strong>the</strong> review report. This note is unpublished<br />

but can be made available upon request. The note included <strong>the</strong> following comments, that we<br />

found important and relevant to be included here:<br />

and<br />

218<br />

“The information and data documentation we provided in our submission<br />

in 2004 were comprehensive. Both as regards <strong>the</strong> questions raised during<br />

<strong>the</strong> week <strong>the</strong> review team met in Bonn and as regards some of <strong>the</strong> comments<br />

in <strong>the</strong> draft report, we found that answers and information were<br />

already given in <strong>the</strong> material submitted. We consider for future submissions<br />

how to improve and highlight <strong>the</strong> information as regards those<br />

questions and comments.”<br />

“The draft review report was available to us ra<strong>the</strong>r late in <strong>the</strong> process<br />

preparing <strong>the</strong> submissions for <strong>2005</strong> as regards data in CRF and documentation<br />

in <strong>the</strong> NIR. As a consequence not all of <strong>the</strong> suggestions and<br />

comments made in <strong>the</strong> draft report which we consider to take notice of<br />

and work upon for next submissions will be implemented in <strong>the</strong> <strong>2005</strong><br />

submissions, but will have to await fur<strong>the</strong>r considerations and work for<br />

future submissions.”<br />

For <strong>the</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> review report on sector level, see<strong>the</strong> sector chapters of this NIR. Below is<br />

only response on cross-cutting and selected items. Also as regards fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement on sector<br />

level, see <strong>the</strong> sector chapters of this NIR.<br />

The response to <strong>the</strong> review team on cross-cutting topics is that <strong>the</strong> uncertainty analyses have been<br />

improved for this submission. For sectors where missing uncertainty analyses were pointed out in<br />

<strong>the</strong> review report <strong>the</strong>se analyses have now been carried out. As regards <strong>the</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> comment<br />

on <strong>the</strong> lack of incorporation of GHG inventories for <strong>the</strong> Faroe Island and Greenland, <strong>the</strong>se<br />

inventories - as far as <strong>the</strong>y are available - have now been included in a separate version of CRFs for<br />

Denmark, Faroe Island and Greenland for 1990-2003. As regards QA with independent reviewers,<br />

such reviews have been performed for Energy and Transport, and for Agriculture and Wastewater<br />

<strong>the</strong>se reviews are ongoing.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> Energy sector as regards disaggregation of energy consumption for Manufacturing Industries<br />

and Construction, this disaggregation has now been carried out according to new splits in <strong>the</strong> energy<br />

statistics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!