30.07.2013 Views

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

Quality control (QC)<br />

Quality planning (QP)<br />

2<br />

5<br />

4 6<br />

Quality improvement (QI)<br />

3<br />

Quality assurance (QA)<br />

Figure 1.2. Inter-relation between <strong>the</strong> activities with regard to quality. The arrows are explained in <strong>the</strong> text<br />

below this figure.<br />

1: The QP sets up <strong>the</strong> objectives and derive measurable properties valid for <strong>the</strong> QC. In case of multiple<br />

objectives <strong>the</strong> QP will typically need to perform some kind of priority among <strong>the</strong> single objectives.<br />

This is especially a challenge when high priority with regard to one objective will induce<br />

lower priority for o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

2: The QC will investigate <strong>the</strong> measurable properties and based of this conclude how well <strong>the</strong> objectives<br />

are fulfilled. Some of <strong>the</strong>se properties will be communicated to <strong>the</strong> reviewing authorities in<br />

order to make <strong>the</strong>m able to secure that <strong>the</strong> inventory meets <strong>the</strong> quality objectives.<br />

3. The QP has to identify measurable indicators for <strong>the</strong> fulfilment of <strong>the</strong> quality objectives. They<br />

form <strong>the</strong> basis for <strong>the</strong> QA and have to be supported by <strong>the</strong> input coming from <strong>the</strong> QC.<br />

4: The result from QC will highlight <strong>the</strong> degree of fulfilment for every quality objective. It will thus<br />

be a good basis for suggestions of improvements of <strong>the</strong> inventory to meet <strong>the</strong> quality objective.<br />

5: Suggested improvements in <strong>the</strong> quality may induce changes in <strong>the</strong> quality objectives and <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

measurability.<br />

6: The evaluation done by external authorities is important input when improvements in quality<br />

are going to be considered.<br />

1.6.3 Definition of quality<br />

A solid definition of quality is essential. Without such a solid definition <strong>the</strong> fulfilment of <strong>the</strong> objectives<br />

will never be clear and <strong>the</strong> process of quality control and assurance can easily turn out to be a<br />

fuzzy and unpleasant experience for <strong>the</strong> people involved. Contrary, in case of a solid definition<br />

and thus a clear goal, it will be possible <strong>the</strong> make a valid statement of “good quality” and thus<br />

form constructive conditions and motivate <strong>the</strong> inventory work positively. A clear definition of<br />

quality has not been given in <strong>the</strong> UNFCCCC guidelines. In <strong>the</strong> Good Practice Guidance chapter<br />

8.2, however, it is mentioned that:<br />

“Quality control requirements, improved accuracy and reduced uncertainty need to be balanced<br />

against requirements for timeliness and cost effectiveness”<br />

1.6.4 Definition of Critical Control Points (CCP)<br />

A Critical Control Points (CCP) is an element or an action, which needs to be taken into account in<br />

order to fulfil <strong>the</strong> quality objectives. Every CCP has to be necessary for <strong>the</strong> objectives and <strong>the</strong> CCP<br />

list needs to be extended if o<strong>the</strong>r factors, not defined by <strong>the</strong> CCP list, are needed in order to reach<br />

at least one of <strong>the</strong> quality objectives.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!