Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

10 Recalculations and improvements 10.1 Explanations and justifications for recalculations Explanations and justifications for the recalculations included in the data in the CRF-format submitted April 15, 2005, and performed since the submission May 19, 2004 are given in the following sector chapters: Energy: • Stationary Combustion Chapter 3.2.5 • Transport Chapter 3.3.7 Industry • Mineral Products Chapter 4.2.5 • Consumption of F-gases Chapter 4.6.5 Solvents and Other Product Use Chapter 5.2.5 Agriculture Chapter 6.8 LULUCF Chapter 7 Waste • Solid Waste Disposal on Land Chapter 8.2.5 • Wastewater Chapter 8.3.6 10.2 Implications for emission levels The implication of the CRF data, submitted April 15, 2005, and in parallel to the submission of this NIR as compared to the latest submitted data is shown as the recalculation data, see CRF Table 8 for 1990-2002. In these tables the differences between the April 15, 2005 submission and the latest submission are calculated. The latest submission of CRF-tables for 1990-2002 was May 17, 2004. However, the May 17, 2004 submission represented no change in emission values as compared to the submission April 15, 2004. The calculation of differences is in per cent so that positive and negative values of this percentage reflect that the April 15, 2005 submission represents bigger respectively smaller emissions than the latest submitted emission value from May 17, 2004. Results from these CRF tables as regards national totals are presented in Table 10.1. For the National Total CO 2 Equivalent Emissions without Land-Use Change and Forestry the general impact of the recalculations performed is small. All the differences for this national total for the time-series as taken from the recalculation tables of the CRF tables for 1990-2002 varies between +0.84% (1990) and -0.50% (1997). For the National Total CO 2 Equivalent Emissions with Land-Use Change and Forestry the general impact of the recalculations is rather small, although the impact is bigger than without LULUCF due to recalculations in the LULUCF Sector. The differences are positive for all years. The differences vary between 2.75% (1996) and 5.41% (1990). These differences refer to recalculated estimates with major changes in the forestry sector for those years, see Chapter 7. 214
Table 10.1 Recalculation performed in year 2005 for inventories 1990-2002 compared to submission May 17, 2004. National totals with and without LULUCF. 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Total CO2 Total CO2 Equivalent Equivalent Emissions Emissions with Land- without Land- Use Change Use Change and Forestry and Forestry Previous submission Latest CO2 equiva 65.917,86 68.749,86 submission 69.486,51 69.328,22 Difference Previous (%) 5,41 0,84 submission Latest CO2 equiva 76.458,40 79.471,40 submission 79.879,12 79.991,87 Difference Previous (%) 4,47 0,65 submission Latest CO2 equiva 70.258,84 73.258,84 submission 73.538,97 73.791,36 Difference Previous (%) 4,67 0,73 submission Latest CO2 equiva 72.410,00 75.625,00 submission 75.706,85 76.173,08 Difference Previous (%) 4,55 0,72 submission Latest CO2 equiva 76.573,07 79.673,07 submission 79.375,88 79.706,14 Difference Previous (%) 3,66 0,04 submission Latest CO2 equiva 73.963,41 76.955,41 submission 76.465,54 76.699,99 Difference Previous (%) 3,38 -0,33 submission Latest CO2 equiva 87.214,31 90.278,31 submission 89.610,16 90.032,61 Difference (%) 2,75 -0,27 Table 10.1 cont. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total CO2 Total CO2 Equivalent Equivalent Emissions Emissions with Land- without Land- Use Change Use Change and Forestry and Forestry Previous submission Latest CO2 equival 77.519,91 80.672,91 submission 79.830,05 80.272,92 Difference Previous (%) 2,98 -0,50 submission Latest CO2 equival 72.344,39 75.657,39 submission 75.260,30 76.079,36 Difference Previous (%) 4,03 0,56 submission Latest CO2 equival 69.241,31 72.552,31 submission 72.029,87 72.900,07 Difference Previous (%) 4,03 0,48 submission Latest CO2 equival 67.155,16 67.808,16 submission 70.095,31 68.313,78 Difference Previous (%) 4,38 0,75 submission Latest CO2 equival 65.774,30 69.313,30 submission 68.566,08 69.724,02 Difference Previous (%) 4,24 0,59 submission Latest CO2 equival 64.677,98 68.490,98 submission 67.520,61 68.996,35 Difference (%) 4,40 0,74 215
Page 1 and 2:
National Environmental Research Ins
Page 3 and 4:
National Environmental Research Ins
Page 5 and 6:
Contents Executive summary 9 ES.1.
Page 7 and 8:
4.3 Chemical industry (2B) 122 4.3.
Page 9 and 10:
8.3.6 Recalculations 209 8.3.7 Plan
Page 11 and 12:
Executive summary ES.1. Background
Page 13 and 14:
electricity. Also lower outdoor tem
Page 15 and 16:
• The GHG emission inventories fo
Page 17 and 18:
effekten af de forskellige drivhusg
Page 19 and 20:
Som beskrevet i rapportens kapitel
Page 21 and 22:
1 Introduction 1.1 Background infor
Page 23 and 24:
The role of the European Union The
Page 25 and 26:
Table 1.1 List of current data stru
Page 27 and 28:
1.4 Brief general description of me
Page 29 and 30:
1A2f (Industry-other), 1A3a (Civil
Page 31 and 32:
is calculated. It is found that tha
Page 33 and 34:
(see the reference list at Chapter
Page 35 and 36:
1 Quality control (QC) Quality plan
Page 37 and 38:
The different CCP’s are not indep
Page 39 and 40:
When new data are introduced they c
Page 41 and 42:
Inventory report for year 3 Invento
Page 43 and 44:
The uncertainty on N 2 O from stati
Page 45 and 46:
1.8 General assessment of the compl
Page 47 and 48:
2 Trends in Greenhouse Gas Emission
Page 49 and 50:
to change in traditional stable sys
Page 51 and 52:
from national fishing and off-road
Page 53 and 54:
3 Energy (CRF sector 1) 3.1 Overvie
Page 55 and 56:
Table 3.3 CH 4 emission from the en
Page 57 and 58:
Fuel consumption time-series for st
Page 59 and 60:
Degree days Fuel consumption adjust
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3.7 CO 2 emission from subsec
Page 63 and 64:
The CH 4 emission from stationary c
Page 65 and 66:
3.2.1.3.4 SO , NO , NMVOC and CO 2
Page 67 and 68:
The fuel consumption of area source
Page 69 and 70:
Table 3.12 CH 4 emission factors 19
Page 71 and 72:
− Gruijthuijsen & Jensen 2000 −
Page 73 and 74:
ues from Pulles & Aardenne 2001. Th
Page 75 and 76:
• Disaggregation of fuel consumpt
Page 77 and 78:
3.3.1.1 Fuel consumption Table 3.18
Page 79 and 80:
3-@ 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 19
Page 81 and 82:
1,4 1,2 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 198
Page 83 and 84:
Table 3.19 Emissions of CO 2 , CH 4
Page 85 and 86:
Passenger cars 56% Passenger cars 8
Page 87 and 88:
WRQV@ 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1985 19
Page 89 and 90:
70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000
Page 91 and 92:
The NO X emission trend for Agricul
Page 93 and 94:
Bunkers The most important emission
Page 95 and 96:
Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã
Page 97 and 98:
age the emissions from catalyst car
Page 99 and 100:
Where S C is the soak emission, l t
Page 101 and 102:
3.3.2.2 Methodologies and reference
Page 103 and 104:
Table 3.26 Fuel specific emission f
Page 105 and 106:
Where E = emission, FC = fuel consu
Page 107 and 108:
For non-road machinery and working
Page 109 and 110:
Emission factors The Danish greenho
Page 111 and 112:
A comparison of the national approa
Page 113 and 114:
( , 4 = = ( ; 4 + ( , 4 −2
Page 115 and 116:
In the 1990-1999 inventories fugiti
Page 117 and 118:
Table 3.38 Uncertainty, CRF sector
Page 119 and 120:
4 Industrial processes (CRF Sector
Page 121 and 122:
The time-series for emission of CO
Page 123 and 124:
4.2.5 Recalculations No source spec
Page 125 and 126:
4.4 Metal production (2C) 4.4.1 Sou
Page 127 and 128:
Table 4.8 Consumption of HFCs in fo
Page 129 and 130:
The potential emissions have been c
Page 131 and 132:
cedure consisted of a check of the
Page 133 and 134:
Danish Environmental Protection Age
Page 135 and 136:
Table 5.1 Emission of chemicals in
Page 137 and 138:
5.2.2 Methodological issues The emi
Page 139 and 140:
(ii) Collection of data for quantif
Page 141 and 142:
6 The emission of greenhouse gases
Page 143 and 144:
Table 6.2 List of institutes involv
Page 145 and 146:
NERI receives the data from differe
Page 147 and 148:
approximately 6%, which nearly corr
Page 149 and 150:
6.3.2 Methodological issues 6.3.2.1
Page 151 and 152:
Table 6.11 Nitrogen excretion, annu
Page 153 and 154:
Table 6.14 Emissions factor - N 2 O
Page 155 and 156:
153
Page 157 and 158:
Table 6.20 Emissions from crop resi
Page 159 and 160:
Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã 80
Page 161 and 162:
6.5 NMVOC emission Less than 1% of
Page 163 and 164:
• This years data delivery agreem
Page 165 and 166: Husted, 1994: Waste Management, Sea
Page 167 and 168: 7 The Specific methodologies regard
Page 169 and 170: In 1990, the forested area with tre
Page 171 and 172: inventory will be quite similar to
Page 173 and 174: Table 7.4 Data on gross uptake of C
Page 175 and 176: place during the first 30 years fol
Page 177 and 178: 7.2.5 Recalculations Since the subm
Page 179 and 180: Table 7.8 Agricultural areas in Den
Page 181 and 182: 7.3.2.1 Emission from mineral soils
Page 183 and 184: Table 7.17 C-emission from organic
Page 185 and 186: Table 7.19 Area classification of t
Page 187 and 188: The LULUCF sector contributes to a
Page 189 and 190: Schöne, D. and Schulte, A. (1999).
Page 191 and 192: Table A2.3 ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃ
Page 193 and 194: As a result the sectoral total in C
Page 195 and 196: Since, the Danish SWDSs are well-ma
Page 197 and 198: Table 8.8. Amounts of waste and CH
Page 199 and 200: Combustible” and “Other not Com
Page 201 and 202: which disaggregation level that can
Page 203 and 204: tion, technical upgrades of the WWT
Page 205 and 206: assuming that the treatment is 100%
Page 207 and 208: intermediate of both processes. Dan
Page 209 and 210: Table 8.19. Uncertainties for main
Page 211 and 212: In general country-specific TOW val
Page 213 and 214: Danish Environmental Protection Age
Page 215: 9 Other (CRF sector 7) Chapter 9 is
Page 219 and 220: Table 10.2. Recalculation performed
Page 221 and 222: For the Industrial Sector uncertain
Page 223 and 224: Annex 1 Key source analyses Descrip
Page 225 and 226: 7KH UHVXOW RI WKH NH\ VRXUFH DQDO\V
Page 227 and 228: 7DEOHV $ ± $ RI WKH *RRG 3UDFWLFH
Page 229 and 230: Table 3. Key source analysis 1990-2
Page 231 and 232: Annex 3 Other detailed methodologic
Page 233 and 234: 1 Introduction The Danish atmospher
Page 235 and 236: Stationary combustion plants are in
Page 237 and 238: Emissions from non-energy use of fu
Page 239 and 240: Coke oven coke The emission factor
Page 241 and 242: Kerosene The emission factor 72 kg/
Page 243 and 244: Illerup 2003. The estimated emissio
Page 245 and 246: The emission factor for CHP plants
Page 247 and 248: − Fuel consumption for transport.
Page 249 and 250: tricity trade, fuel consumption and
Page 251 and 252: Figure 3A-6 depicts the time-series
Page 253 and 254: 1A4a Commercial / Institutional 2%
Page 255 and 256: CO 2 [Tg] 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1990
Page 257 and 258: Other stationary combustion plants
Page 259 and 260: 1A4a Commercial / Institutional 2%
Page 261 and 262: only accounted for a small portion
Page 263 and 264: Electricity and heat production is
Page 265 and 266: The use of wood in residential boil
Page 267 and 268:
straw consumption in residential pl
Page 269 and 270:
• The IPCC reference approach val
Page 271 and 272:
Table 3A-21 Key sources, stationary
Page 273 and 274:
emission are N 2 O emission (all pl
Page 275 and 276:
enewable fuels has increased. The D
Page 277 and 278:
Jørgensen, L. & Johansen, L. P. 20
Page 279 and 280:
Appendix 3A-1 The Danish emission i
Page 281 and 282:
030203 Blast furnace cowpers 1A2a 0
Page 283 and 284:
Table 3A-28 Detailed fuel consumpti
Page 285 and 286:
1A2f 118 SEWAGE SLUDGE 030311 40162
Page 287 and 288:
Appendix 3A-4 Emission factors Tabl
Page 289 and 290:
Table 3A-33 N 2 O emission factors
Page 291 and 292:
7. Bjerrum M., 2002. Danish Technol
Page 293 and 294:
NOX NATURAL GAS 010105 1A1a 276 241
Page 295 and 296:
019 Enstedvaerket 04 010101 204 GAS
Page 297 and 298:
Table 3A-39 Large point sources, pl
Page 299 and 300:
Appendix 3A-6 Uncertainty estimates
Page 301 and 302:
Table 3A-42 Uncertainty estimation,
Page 303 and 304:
Table 3A-47 Uncertainty estimation,
Page 305 and 306:
Table 3A-49 Fuel category correspon
Page 307 and 308:
Appendix 3A-9 Reference approach Ã
Page 309 and 310:
Table 3A-51 Fuel category correspon
Page 311 and 312:
20201 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 313 and 314:
Passenger Cars Diesel >2.0 l Euro I
Page 315 and 316:
Passenger Cars Gasoline 2.0 l Euro
Page 317 and 318:
Buses Urban Buses Conventional 0 19
Page 319 and 320:
Sector Subsector Tech FYear LYear 1
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Sector Subsector Tech FCu FCr FCh C
Page 327 and 328:
Sector Subsector Tech COu COr COh N
Page 329 and 330:
Sector Subsector Tech COuR COrR COh
Page 331 and 332:
Annex 3B-5: Fuel use factors (MJ/km
Page 333 and 334:
2-wheelers 1999 1.195 1.264 1.578 8
Page 335 and 336:
2-wheelers 1991 6.249 4.379 2.011 6
Page 337 and 338:
2002 Heavy Duty Vehicles 37849451 8
Page 339 and 340:
Annex 3B-7: COPERT III:DEA statisti
Page 341 and 342:
0808 Excavators (wheel type) 1000 1
Page 343 and 344:
0808 Forklifts 5-10 tons (diesel) 0
Page 345 and 346:
0809 Trimmers 60000 0.8 0.5 15 10 1
Page 347 and 348:
1990 80502 Air traffic. other airpo
Page 349 and 350:
2003 80403 Fishing Kerosene 731 4.6
Page 351 and 352:
Year Category Mode SO2 NOx NMVOC CH
Page 353 and 354:
Pollutant CRF ID Unit 1985 1986 198
Page 355 and 356:
Pollutant CRF ID Unit 1985 1986 198
Page 357 and 358:
Uncertainty estimation, CH 4 Gas Ba
Page 359 and 360:
Uncertainty estimation, N 2 O IPCC
Page 361 and 362:
Table. Production of Lime/Hydrated
Page 363 and 364:
Suckling cattle 170.2 Swine Average
Page 365 and 366:
7DEOH 'HWDLOHG LQIRUPDWLRQ UHODWHG
Page 367 and 368:
7DEOH &KDQJHV LQ VWDEOH W\SH ± Liv
Page 369 and 370:
Pullet, consumption, floor (100 pcs
Page 371 and 372:
Annex 3E Solid Waste Disposal on La
Page 373 and 374:
B = Biological N = Nitrification (r
Page 375 and 376:
Table 3E.7. Stabilisation of sludge
Page 377 and 378:
in Table 3E.9. Table 3E.9 Gross emi
Page 379 and 380:
5HFRYHUHG &+ Ã HPLVVLRQV >*J@ 14.
Page 381 and 382:
Annex 3F Solvents National Atmosphe
Page 383 and 384:
83 1-ethyl-2,2,6-trimethylcyclohexa
Page 385 and 386:
191 2-methoxy-2-methylpropane 192 2
Page 387 and 388:
299 acetaldehyde 300 acetic acid 30
Page 389 and 390:
407 cyclopentane 408 cyclopenta-phe
Page 391 and 392:
515 methyl naphthalenes 516 methyl
Page 393 and 394:
624 trans-3-hexene 625 trialkyl pho
Page 395 and 396:
Annex 5 Assessment of completeness
Page 397 and 398:
Annex 6.1 Annex 6.1. Additional inf
Page 399 and 400:
Table A6.1.2 ÃÃÃÃ Kingdom DK Ã
Page 401 and 402:
Table A6.1.4 ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃ Kin
Page 403 and 404:
Annex 6.2 Additional information to
Page 405 and 406:
Annex 7 Table 6.1 and 6.2 of the IP
Page 407 and 408:
Annex 8 Other annexes - (Any other
Page 409 and 410:
PM 2.2: An explicit description in
Page 411 and 412:
Correctness The data at level 3 has
Page 413 and 414:
Level 6 Transparency The background
Page 415 and 416:
Table A9.1 ÃÃÃÃ Denmark ÃÃÃ
Page 417 and 418:
Table A9.3 ÃÃÃÃ Denmark ÃÃÃ
show all

Denmark's National Inventory Report 2005 - Submitted under the ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?