06.08.2013 Views

TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DATA BOOK: EDITION 22 - Center for ...

TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DATA BOOK: EDITION 22 - Center for ...

TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DATA BOOK: EDITION 22 - Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7–28<br />

Of the tested vehicles, the 1994 Oldsmobile Olds 88 had the greatest fuel economy loss from 55 mph to 75 mpg.<br />

The 1997 Toyota Celica tested fuel economy was slightly better at 65 mph than at 55 mph.<br />

Speed<br />

(mph)<br />

1988<br />

Chevrolet<br />

Corsica<br />

Table 7.25<br />

Steady Speed Fuel Economy <strong>for</strong> Vehicles Tested in the 1997 Study<br />

(miles per gallon)<br />

1993<br />

Subaru<br />

Legacy<br />

1994<br />

Oldsmobile<br />

Olds 88<br />

1994<br />

Oldsmobile<br />

Cutlass<br />

1994<br />

Chevrolet<br />

Pickup<br />

1994 Jeep<br />

Grand<br />

Cherokee<br />

<strong>TRANSPORTATION</strong> <strong>ENERGY</strong> <strong>DATA</strong> <strong>BOOK</strong>: <strong>EDITION</strong> <strong>22</strong>—2002<br />

1994<br />

Mercury<br />

Villager<br />

1995<br />

Geo<br />

Prizm<br />

5 10.0 14.5 10.5 5.1 7.9 8.2 12.3 18.1 19.1<br />

10 16.8 24.7 14.9 7.9 16.0 11.2 19.0 23.1 34.1<br />

15 17.7 31.9 <strong>22</strong>.2 11.4 16.3 17.5 <strong>22</strong>.4 38.9 41.7<br />

20 21.7 34.4 26.3 12.5 19.9 24.7 25.8 39.4 46.0<br />

25 23.9 37.4 28.3 15.6 <strong>22</strong>.7 21.8 30.8 41.7 52.6<br />

30 28.7 39.7 29.0 19.0 26.3 21.6 30.3 40.0 50.8<br />

35 28.6 38.0 30.9 21.2 24.3 25.0 26.1 39.1 47.6<br />

40 29.2 37.0 33.2 23.0 26.7 25.5 29.0 38.9 36.2<br />

45 28.8 33.7 32.4 23.0 27.3 25.4 27.8 42.3 44.1<br />

50 31.2 33.7 34.2 27.3 26.3 24.8 30.1 39.1 44.8<br />

55 29.1 37.7 34.6 29.1 25.1 24.0 31.7 37.7 42.5<br />

60 28.2 35.9 32.5 28.2 <strong>22</strong>.6 23.2 27.3 36.7 48.4<br />

65 28.7 33.4 30.0 25.0 21.8 21.3 25.3 34.1 43.5<br />

70 26.1 31.0 26.7 <strong>22</strong>.9 20.1 20.0 23.9 31.7 39.2<br />

75 23.7 28.8 24.0 21.6<br />

Fuel economy loss<br />

18.1 19.1 <strong>22</strong>.4 28.3 36.8<br />

55–65 mph 1.4% 11.4% 13.3% 14.1% 13.1% 11.3% 20.2% 9.5% -2.4%<br />

65–75 mph 17.4% 13.8% 20.0% 13.6% 17.0% 10.3% 11.5% 17.0% 15.4%<br />

55–75 mph 18.6% 23.6% 30.6% 25.8% 27.9% 20.4% 29.3% 24.9% 13.4%<br />

1997<br />

Toyota<br />

Celica<br />

Source:<br />

B.H. West, R.N. McGill, J.W. Hodgson, S.S. Sluder, D.E. Smith, Development and Verification of Light-Duty Modal Emissions and<br />

Fuel Consumption Values <strong>for</strong> Traffic Models, Washington, DC, April 1997, and additional project data, April 1998.<br />

(Additional resources: www.fhwa-tsis.com)<br />

Note:<br />

For specifications of the tested vehicles, please see Table 7.21.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!