12.10.2013 Views

EurasianStudies_0110..

EurasianStudies_0110..

EurasianStudies_0110..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

January-March 2010 JOURNAL OF EURASIAN STUDIES Volume II., Issue 1.<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

into the hands of our Slavonic neighbours, who fostered definite animosity towards Hungarians. After<br />

the Second World War, we suffered at the hands of the Soviet bear, while the shadow of Communism<br />

was projected not only on the hearts, but also on the minds. The soul of the Hungarian people could not<br />

bear this oppression for long. They gave evidence of their superhuman strength and vitality springing<br />

from sacral depths when, in 1956, they revolted against Russian tanks and local servants of the Russians,<br />

who were in numerical superiority. Our bloody, but clean revolution – for the umpteenth time – fell, and<br />

the slow erosion of souls and memory continued to a greater extent than ever.<br />

Just like plants, nations are also damaged fatally if their roots are eaten away by some disease. The<br />

Austrians knew Talleyrand’s famous saying well (“If you want a nation to be your servant, take its<br />

past.”), and from the end of the 18 th century they methodically set out to erode, then later to transform<br />

totally our ancient history. Thus, the pre-conceived Finno-Ugric theory was born, which broke away<br />

from all the former traditions of Hungarians, and outlined a totally new theory of origin, which<br />

presented the Hungarians as underdeveloped as possible.<br />

While our myth of origin, the legend of the Miraculous Deer connects the Hun and Magyar nations to<br />

Hunor and Magor (Magyar), King Nimród’s twin-sons; while all our Medieval chronicles consider our<br />

Hun origin unequivocal, even obvious; while Great King Atilla is respected as the King of Hungarians<br />

and his family-tree is traced back to Hunor in 33 steps, the Saxon, Paul Hunsdorfer and the German,<br />

Joseph Budenz, who could not even speak Hungarian in the beginning, as members of the Hungarian (!)<br />

Academy of Sciences, after the suppression of the 1848–49 War of Independence, under orders from the<br />

Hapsburgs, worked out a theory about a nation which never existed, and unfortunately, since then, this<br />

has been taught as Hungarian ancient history, beginning in primary school.<br />

While the resemblance between our greatest kings was undeniable – the herma of “Shaman king”<br />

Saint László from the 11 th century and the sculptures of the Parthian princes from more than a thousand<br />

years ago show startling similarity –; while King Mátyás the Just, in the 16 th century, considered himself<br />

Atilla’s reincarnation, the Finno-Ugric theory is still trying to link the ancestors of the Hungarians to<br />

such primitive people as the Voguls and the Ostyaks, living far in the North, who are now becoming<br />

extinct.<br />

Rejecting the settled life-style of the stock-raising Scythians the Finno-Ugric theorists developed an<br />

image of a nomadic people of hunter-gatherers, consisting of hordes of tribes, which did not even have<br />

its own language; the majority of their words consisting of loan-words picked up during their<br />

wanderings. This theory is, even today, exclusively the official theory in the field of Hungarian<br />

linguistics, due to the efforts of the enthusiastic followers of Hunsdorfer and Budenz (paid by the<br />

government), who – in the interest of their own scientific careers – keep alive this old-fashioned distorted<br />

theory, which was obviously born for political reasons.<br />

It is thought-provoking, however, that Cardinal Giuseppe Mezzofanti, who spoke 58 languages<br />

(among them Hungarian), ranked our language “before all others, on the same level as Greek and Latin”;<br />

that, at the beginning of the 19 th century, world-famous researchers, such as Jules Oppert, Francois C.<br />

Lenormant, Archibald H. Sayce and Anton Deimel, considered Sumerian to be related to Hungarian and<br />

that in the 1950’s the Finnish Ministry of Education officially rejected the theory of Finnish–Hungarian<br />

relationship. In the last decade, several scientific studies have been published (by non-Hungarians),<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________<br />

© Copyright Mikes International 2001-2010 161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!