Against the Wind: Eberhard Arnold and the Bruderhof - Plough
Against the Wind: Eberhard Arnold and the Bruderhof - Plough
Against the Wind: Eberhard Arnold and the Bruderhof - Plough
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Against</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wind</strong><br />
Sentenced to inacivity, <strong>Eberhard</strong> was unable to participate in <strong>the</strong> Neuwerk<br />
conference at Marburg in September. As it was, he had anticipated <strong>the</strong> conference<br />
with mixed feelings. His uneasiness was confirmed after <strong>the</strong> fact by reports<br />
from Else von Holl<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs who took part. Speakers like Gün<strong>the</strong>r<br />
Dehn <strong>and</strong> Karl Mennicke dem<strong>and</strong>ed greater involvement in party politics <strong>and</strong><br />
did not hide a certain touch of arrogance toward <strong>the</strong> “Schlüchtern pietists.”<br />
Consequently <strong>the</strong> Marburg conference drove a wedge of division through<br />
<strong>the</strong> Neuwerk movement, prompting <strong>Eberhard</strong> to describe it as a defeat for <strong>the</strong><br />
Neuwerk cause. 9 He wrote: “Since <strong>the</strong> Marburg conference we are more resolute<br />
than ever to promote <strong>the</strong> gosel <strong>and</strong> nothing else in Das Neue Werk <strong>and</strong> in all<br />
our work…It is crucial that <strong>the</strong>re be solidarity <strong>and</strong> loyalty among those who are<br />
glad to be called ‘pietists’ but whose eyes are open to <strong>the</strong> social responsibilities of<br />
Jesus’ disciples.”<br />
Even Otto Herpel was eventually bruised by <strong>Eberhard</strong>’s energetic acivity<br />
in building up <strong>the</strong> Neuwerk Publishing House. Before becoming coeditor with<br />
<strong>Eberhard</strong>, Herpel had put toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Christian Democrat as a sideline to his<br />
pastoral work. But Das Neue Werk was to be run professionally or not at all – that<br />
had been <strong>Eberhard</strong>’s stipulation on assuming <strong>the</strong> management. Authorization<br />
for this <strong>and</strong> that, punctual payment of royalties, recruiting members for <strong>the</strong><br />
cooperative, soliciting advertisements, alternating with <strong>Eberhard</strong> on <strong>the</strong> final<br />
editorial check of <strong>the</strong> magazine’s bimonthly issues – all this soon grew too much<br />
for Herpel. In mid-September Otto Herpel visited <strong>Eberhard</strong> on his sickbed <strong>and</strong><br />
informed him that he was resigning as an editor for good. He was not, he admitted,<br />
<strong>the</strong> committed person needed for such work.<br />
It is clear enough that <strong>the</strong>se two men, who had been so quickly drawn to<br />
each o<strong>the</strong>r, had just as quickly drawn apart in spirit. Otto Herpel had already<br />
swallowed Karl Barth’s sober direction – hook, line, <strong>and</strong> sinker – at <strong>the</strong> conference<br />
in Tambach in September of 1919. Now he wrote, “<strong>Arnold</strong>’s articles have<br />
too much pietism in <strong>the</strong>m for me.” 10 But in spite of reservations <strong>and</strong> friction<br />
Otto Herpel continued as co-publisher of Das Neue Werk, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> end his<br />
resignation as editor improved, ra<strong>the</strong>r than impaired, his friendship with<br />
<strong>Eberhard</strong>.<br />
City on a hill<br />
Community of work, community of <strong>the</strong> Lord’s Supper: <strong>the</strong> first aim had been<br />
accomplished, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r soon followed. On September 26, 1920, <strong>the</strong> household<br />
105