25.10.2012 Views

Against the Wind: Eberhard Arnold and the Bruderhof - Plough

Against the Wind: Eberhard Arnold and the Bruderhof - Plough

Against the Wind: Eberhard Arnold and the Bruderhof - Plough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Against</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wind</strong><br />

comfort that it falls on a long list of o<strong>the</strong>r prominent <strong>the</strong>ologians <strong>and</strong> leaders of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Evangelical Alliance Movement as well.<br />

did god want thE war?<br />

<strong>Eberhard</strong> titled his first article after <strong>the</strong> outbreak of war “God Speaks in Serious<br />

Times.” 9 In <strong>the</strong> opening paragraphs he borrowed a statement from his fa<strong>the</strong>r:<br />

“World history is world judgment.” As a nineteen-year-old <strong>Eberhard</strong> had rebelled<br />

with every sinew of his being against this viewpoint. Now, at thirty-one, he had<br />

lost his youthful edge. Had he grown more staid <strong>and</strong> middle-class? It almost<br />

seems so, judging by his explanation of <strong>the</strong> war to readers of <strong>the</strong> Evangelical<br />

Alliance Magazine: “God wants us to recognize that this war, <strong>the</strong> most terrible <strong>the</strong><br />

world has ever known, is a proof of his goodness, patience, <strong>and</strong> long-suffering.”<br />

A full year into <strong>the</strong> war he still wrote that <strong>the</strong> war was “from God,” contending<br />

that God was pursuing a “vein of good,” which in this case was “<strong>the</strong> defense of<br />

righteousness by <strong>the</strong> more righteous of <strong>the</strong> warring governments.” 10 His <strong>the</strong>ological<br />

basis began to take a dubious slant. “Because unrighteousness has gained <strong>the</strong> upper<br />

h<strong>and</strong> in recent years, we must consider every war as a merciful check against <strong>the</strong><br />

satanic <strong>and</strong> anti-Christian powers, <strong>and</strong> as directed against evil.” Shortly afterwards<br />

he wrote on <strong>the</strong> same <strong>the</strong>me that “Satan <strong>and</strong> his spirits must be fought with <strong>the</strong><br />

weapons of violence <strong>and</strong> wrath, war <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sword, fire <strong>and</strong> brimstone.” 11 Through<br />

such words as <strong>the</strong>se, <strong>Eberhard</strong> had fallen back on a Gnostic pattern of thought as<br />

a recourse to bolster his war <strong>the</strong>ories: God will win in <strong>the</strong> final battle, but only by<br />

a hair’s breadth. God bears responsibility for <strong>the</strong> fight, but <strong>the</strong> devil prescribes <strong>the</strong><br />

weapons of battle.<br />

This is <strong>the</strong> essence at <strong>the</strong> core of his war premise, <strong>and</strong> it is not without a certain<br />

dramaticeffect.Itdoes,however,presentvariousdrawbacks,<strong>the</strong>mostobviousbeing<br />

that it is simply not Christian. Only drastic distortion can bring it to any biblical<br />

foundation. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, such a statement is incomplete <strong>and</strong> illogical. Wasn’t it<br />

actually <strong>the</strong> war itself that had unleashed satanic <strong>and</strong> anti-Christian forces? At <strong>the</strong><br />

end of <strong>the</strong> first year of <strong>the</strong> war, hundreds of thous<strong>and</strong>s had already bled, burned,<br />

or suffocated to death in Fl<strong>and</strong>ers, in Champagne, in Alsace, <strong>and</strong> in Galicia. Proofs<br />

of God’s goodness, patience, <strong>and</strong> long-suffering?…<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!