31.12.2013 Views

The manuscripts of His Grace the Duke of ... - Electric Scotland

The manuscripts of His Grace the Duke of ... - Electric Scotland

The manuscripts of His Grace the Duke of ... - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10<br />

a bill given in to <strong>the</strong> Council against Colonel Douglas, <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>of</strong> Queensberry. <strong>The</strong> Premier took <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> his bro<strong>the</strong>r and<br />

resented <strong>the</strong> action <strong>of</strong> Claverhouse. Drummond makes frequent<br />

mention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter to Queensberry in<br />

his letters, and always in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>of</strong> denouncing it. He brought<br />

<strong>the</strong> matter under <strong>the</strong> notice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Duke</strong> <strong>of</strong> York and states <strong>the</strong><br />

displeasure <strong>the</strong> <strong>Duke</strong> felt at Claverhouse in <strong>the</strong> matter. In letter<br />

No. 276, he says <strong>of</strong> Claverhouse, "if he uill play <strong>the</strong> fool he<br />

most drink as he breus." In letter No. 281, <strong>the</strong> last in this<br />

Eeport, dated 16 April 1685, Drummond, who was now Earl <strong>of</strong><br />

Melfort, intimates to Queensberry <strong>the</strong> King's interposition in his<br />

favour in <strong>the</strong> matter, by ordering Claverhouse to give Queensberry<br />

satisfaction.<br />

<strong>The</strong> year 1685 opened with a display <strong>of</strong> unabated zeal upon<br />

<strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government and its <strong>of</strong>ficials against <strong>the</strong><br />

Covenanters. Jealousy was now more than ever manifested lest<br />

any mercy should be shewn <strong>the</strong>m ei<strong>the</strong>r by <strong>the</strong> King or by<br />

those under him. Drummond's letter. No. 267, while giving<br />

an example <strong>of</strong> this, makes it abundantly evident how little<br />

leniency to <strong>the</strong> Covenanters accorded with <strong>the</strong> policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

government. He refers on 29th January to rumours <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> King's<br />

intention to adopt new and apparently milder measures and to<br />

release some prisoners. Queensberry appears in some alarm<br />

to have mentioned <strong>the</strong> rumours to Drummond, who replies,<br />

"As for new measures, fear <strong>the</strong>m not; <strong>the</strong> suggestion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>m is in enmity to <strong>the</strong> King and <strong>Duke</strong>, and what neuer entered<br />

in <strong>the</strong>r thought to doe. So think <strong>the</strong>s stories lyes." As for <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r matter, he assures him on this also, saying it was only<br />

" some loyall subjects imprisoned by reason <strong>of</strong> Oats' plott." Of<br />

any o<strong>the</strong>r course, such as had been imagined, " I am sure my<br />

principalis are so farr from that, that I uold clamor higts befor<br />

<strong>the</strong>s fanatiques get any rest to truble us mor."<br />

<strong>The</strong> first reference to <strong>the</strong> illness <strong>of</strong> King Charles <strong>the</strong> Second<br />

which terminated in his death is in letter (No. 268), dated<br />

5th February 1685. In this letter Drummond reports that <strong>the</strong><br />

King continued to grow better and better, and that a return <strong>of</strong><br />

feverishness <strong>the</strong> previous night had been met by giving<br />

him " Jesuites pouder " twice during <strong>the</strong> night, which<br />

relieved him, so that he was better than he had<br />

been since <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> his trouble. <strong>The</strong> King died a day<br />

later, on 6th February 1685, and was succeeded by his bro<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

King James <strong>the</strong> Seventh. Moray and Drummond, <strong>the</strong> two<br />

Secretaries, on <strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> King's death wrote to <strong>the</strong> Council<br />

in <strong>Scotland</strong> reminding <strong>the</strong>m to have King James proclaimed with<br />

<strong>the</strong> usual solemnities, and enclosing a proclamation <strong>of</strong> his<br />

Majesty. This letter which is printed by Wodrow,^ is not<br />

included in <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> letters here reported. But it is<br />

alluded to in letter No. 269, which also gives some account <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> King's death and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proclamation <strong>of</strong> King James.<br />

^<strong>His</strong>tory, Folio Edit., Vol. II. No. ci. B. p. 141.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!