04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />

improvement in Bangladesh’s trade balance. The<br />

increase in trade is the difference in the trade balance<br />

in with- and without project scenarios.<br />

Access to Education, Markets, and Infrastructure:<br />

Several quantifiable benefits emerge for the local<br />

population with better connectivity. These will not be<br />

large as compared to the figures of improved trade but<br />

they can be compared to the resettlement costs to see<br />

long-term local benefits emerging from the project. The<br />

corridor under consideration is in proximity to SH1,<br />

and has features similar to this and SH10. 11 The categories<br />

of affected persons include project affected<br />

households and communities, both vulnerable and nonvulnerable;<br />

small business enterprises (SBE), such as<br />

tea shops, temporary markets, or mechanics; and informal<br />

dwellers or squatters, who are illegal or unauthorised<br />

occupants. While there will be costs of relocating<br />

these persons and structures, there are increased opportunities<br />

for them as well. In order to compute incremental<br />

benefits from better access to education, markets<br />

and infrastructure facilities, we compute a valuation<br />

for time savings in Table 9.7. Assuming each person<br />

saves 2 hours a day and can be gainfully employed in<br />

this time, we attach a monetary valuation to the times<br />

savings for 2000 households. This is valued at the<br />

current wage rate at Rs 10 per hour.<br />

Table 9.7 Estimated Time Savings from the Project<br />

Unit<br />

Current time savings per household per day 120 minutes<br />

Total time savings per household annum 92 days<br />

Number of beneficiary households in 2000<br />

the area<br />

Wage rate at Rs 10 per hour, savings per Rs 7,300<br />

household<br />

Benefits from Time Saved Rs 14,600,000<br />

Benefits from Time Saved $339,535<br />

Employment Benefits<br />

Normal road projects have a high labour component<br />

and wage bills are approximately 30% even for large<br />

national highway projects. Hence, we can make a<br />

conservative assumption that 20% of projects costs is<br />

the wage bill, which is a direct benefit for the people of<br />

the region. Indirect employment benefits will come from<br />

increased employment opportunities in the region due<br />

to better connectivity and facilities. We assume that<br />

employment benefits accrue only during the time of<br />

project implementation.<br />

Total Benefits: A summation of national benefits from<br />

increased trade and local benefits from increased<br />

employment and education and market opportunities<br />

yields total benefits from the project. The trends of<br />

additional benefits with the project over time are in<br />

Table 9.8.<br />

Table 9.8 Total Benefits from the Project (US $)<br />

Year National Net Employment Time Net Benefits<br />

Exports Benefits Savings<br />

1 2,500,000 –10,000,000<br />

5 2,500,000 –10,000,000<br />

10 78,918,155 339,535 79,257,690<br />

15 164,112,799 339,535 164,452,334<br />

20 341,265,215 339,535 341,604,750<br />

25 709,619,187 339,535 709,958,722<br />

Benefits Costs Analysis<br />

The detailed result of a benefits costs analysis, should<br />

the government undertake such a project on its on, is<br />

conducted as the base scenario. We take a 27 year<br />

scenario with $125 million as project costs incurred<br />

over the five years at 10% in the first year, 20% in the<br />

second, 30% in the third and fourth year, and 10% in<br />

the last year. 20% of costs are the wage bill. Trade and<br />

time-savings benefits are assumed to accrue only after<br />

the end of the project. We take $1 million as<br />

maintenance costs in two phases. The main results from<br />

the exercise are summarised in Table 9.9.<br />

Table 9.9 Results from Benefit-Cost Simulations<br />

Economic Rate Net Present<br />

of Return (%) Value (NPV) ($)<br />

Base Calculation 37.73 638,788,238<br />

Benefits lagged by 1 year 24.36 441,535,923<br />

Benefits lagged by 2 years 22.70 350,285,175<br />

Costs up by 10% 35.78 629,890,479<br />

Benefits lagged by 1 year 23.23 424,693,737<br />

Benefits lagged by 2 years 21.66 334,294,177<br />

Benefits down by 10% 35.99 567,933,080<br />

Benefits lagged by 1 year 23.22 382,254,281<br />

Benefits lagged by 2 years 21.64 300,794,717<br />

The base calculations have been computed with the<br />

conservative assumption that the project will lead to<br />

11<br />

ADB (2001b) estimates 1834 persons are affected along SH1 and SH10 in West Bengal (including bypass) as, categorised<br />

according to ownership of structures. Retail service shops along the roads are 35% while food kiosks are 29%. Over 60% of<br />

the small businesses are owner-operated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!