04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM TRANSPORT AND TRADE FACILITATION IN SOUTH ASIA 85<br />

tomatoes and other vegetables had gone from India to<br />

Pakistan; the trade of tomatoes alone in this period<br />

was worth Rs 143 million. 16 Direct trade among the<br />

countries is expected to go up significantly with the<br />

allowing of trucks to cross the international border. 17<br />

Railways are the most economical and fuel-efficient<br />

mode of transportation and there is significant potential<br />

for containerised cargo movement. A bilateral agreement<br />

with several components including streamlined<br />

documentation procedures, operationalisation of third<br />

country traffic and transit, removal of wagon-type<br />

restrictions is required to realise the full potential of<br />

trade via railways but the project is restricted to<br />

infrastructure improvements as a first step.<br />

Taneja (2007) estimates TC imposed on importers<br />

and exporters for not being able to avail of the direct<br />

rail link to transport goods. The costs are estimated as<br />

money costs, which includes bribes to customs officials,<br />

police, border authorities, and others for the procedural<br />

clearances. Transport costs for various rail, truck, air<br />

and sea routes between the countries was surveyed. It<br />

is found that Mumbai-Dubai-Karachi and Delhi-<br />

Mumbai-Karachi routes are most efficient in terms of<br />

transaction costs per container-kilometre (Table 9.14).<br />

However, even if one considers total bribes, costs per<br />

container are lowest by the direct rail route which<br />

cannot be utilised as it is not always available. Actual<br />

transport time is also lowest on this route but delays<br />

are due to time taken in obtaining clearances and<br />

procurement of wagons.<br />

Taneja’s survey of traders reveals almost every<br />

exportable item is exported to Pakistan through third<br />

countries and that cross-border informal trade occurs<br />

though bus and rail passengers.<br />

The Project<br />

The most significant rail corridor connecting India and<br />

Pakistan is the corridor from Lahore connecting to the<br />

Indian Railways network by broad gauge. The link<br />

from Lahore is 28 km to the Indian border through<br />

Wagah/Attari. The corridor from Attari is connected<br />

to Kolkata through Amritsar. The Attari-Amritsar<br />

section of 23 km is single line and not electrified. The<br />

Delhi-Kolkata corridor is capable of handling very high<br />

volumes of both passenger and freight traffics.<br />

However, inadequate handling capacity at Lahore and<br />

insufficient infrastructure facilities at the rail cargo<br />

station in Lahore add to transaction costs. Lack of EDI<br />

facilities at both sides of the land border slows down<br />

the movement of consignments.<br />

For this analysis, we consider physical barriers on<br />

the Pakistan side which require being addressed<br />

(SAARC 2007). The project components are:<br />

• Rehabilitation of the 28-km section between<br />

Wagah and Lahore, from single-lined and nonelectrified<br />

to electrified section, and that of<br />

associated structures.<br />

• Provision of air-brakes locomotive and freight<br />

wagons on Pakistan railways.<br />

• Computerisation at the border.<br />

The project investment costs are summarised in<br />

Table 9.15.<br />

Table 9.15 Project Cost Estimates<br />

Kolkata–Bangaon<br />

$ million<br />

Civil works 52.9<br />

Equipment 2.8<br />

Land acquisition, resettlement, and 3.8<br />

social mitigation<br />

Upgradation of warehousing facilities 7.9<br />

Restructuring costs 0.7<br />

Contingencies 1.5<br />

Total 73.0<br />

Besides boosting trade, the benefits from improved<br />

railway infrastructure is immense which includes cost<br />

and time savings to traders. There is also reduced fuel<br />

consumption since railway traffic is more fuel-efficient<br />

than road traffic, resulting in savings in carbon dioxide<br />

emissions. Further there are reduced costs of future road<br />

maintenance and reduced incidence of road accidents.<br />

Offsetting increases in railways accidents are negligible<br />

and not estimated. We quantify two types of benefits<br />

for this analysis: increased trade and local employment<br />

benefits.<br />

Increased Trade: India’s exports to Pakistan as a<br />

percentage of total exports have been negligible at less<br />

than 1%. The import and export growth figures show<br />

fluctuations due to the political relations between the<br />

countries. However, there has been a rising trend since<br />

the late 1990s with the rate of growth of exports<br />

being 43% in 2002–03, 82% in 2004–05 and 32% in<br />

2005–06 while import growth for corresponding years<br />

has been – 31%, 64%, and 89%. We forecast the trends<br />

16<br />

‘Peoples movement down, Trade volume up between India-Pakistan’, http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/india-news/<br />

17<br />

Sarin, Jaideep, ‘After 60 years, India-Pakistan trade finds a direct link’, http://www.indiaenews.com/business/20070928/<br />

72520.htm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!