04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />

construction industry in the country. 6 The CDB is<br />

responsible for registration, classification and monitoring<br />

of consultants, contractors, and their performance.<br />

There is nothing in its rules and regulations which could<br />

suggest the presence of any discriminatory provisions.<br />

Since the country heavily depends on other countries’<br />

assistance in the area of construction particularly on<br />

India there does not seem to be any explicit discriminatory<br />

provisions.<br />

Current development theories contend that<br />

infrastructure together with integration into the world<br />

economy is essential for economic development<br />

(UNESCAP 2003). Small countries such as Bhutan face<br />

considerable challenges, as the cost of infrastructure<br />

provision is very high, and successful integration is<br />

constrained by several structural and locational<br />

problems associated with smallness and remoteness.<br />

The high costs of infrastructure provision makes small<br />

countries heavily dependent on external assistance for<br />

capital investments.<br />

Bhutan should undertake liberal commitments in<br />

the sector that will help it improve its infrastructure.<br />

This will have very positive implications for tourism<br />

services. It should also make its Mode 4 regime liberal<br />

so that other South Asian countries can gain market<br />

access for their professionals and workers. This will<br />

improve the overall quality of labour in the country<br />

and may lead to skill enhancement in the local labour.<br />

Other Regulations Affecting Trade in<br />

Construction Services<br />

Recognition<br />

As already noted, Article VII of GATS specifies that<br />

for the fulfillment of its standards, licensing or certification<br />

of service suppliers, a member may recognise the<br />

education and experience obtained or licenses or<br />

certification granted in a country. This article thus urges<br />

members to recognise the educational or other<br />

qualifications of service suppliers of other countries.<br />

Recognition related issues are of crucial significance to<br />

developing countries including South Asian ones as lack<br />

of such recognition of professional qualifications can<br />

act as a formidable barrier to providing services<br />

especially via movement of natural persons. As per the<br />

provision of this article, members have an obligation<br />

to notify the Council for Trade in Services (CTS) of<br />

existing recognition agreements as well as new ones<br />

that are negotiated. However, it appears that not all<br />

such agreements are notified. It can therefore be argued<br />

6<br />

About the CDB, http://www.cdb.gov.bt/aboutcdb.htm, last visited on 24 October 2007.<br />

that adequate opportunity is not being provided to<br />

other members to indicate their interests in participating<br />

in these negotiations. In view of the ineffectiveness of<br />

notification obligations one would tend to consider this<br />

article as any other best endeavour clause (Kumar<br />

2005). Further, the problem is that there is no provision<br />

for mandated review or negotiation on this article to<br />

make desired improvement.<br />

Perhaps the most important domestic policy issue<br />

to be addressed relates to the recognition of qualifications.<br />

Lack of recognition of qualifications often constitutes<br />

a major barrier to entry by South Asian service<br />

suppliers, who are largely outside existing recognition<br />

initiatives and thus at a disadvantage in various services<br />

where licensing and certification requirements apply<br />

to entry (Chanda 2005). However, India has made an<br />

historical attempt by having taken some steps in this<br />

direction in its agreement with Singapore- CECA. The<br />

CECA has a list of professionals and both parties are<br />

expected to recognise their qualifications. In the context<br />

of South Asia it is suggested that a similar exercise<br />

should be carried out. However, here apart from professionals,<br />

the list must also include less skilled and semiskilled<br />

workers.<br />

At the South Asian level developing MRAs with a<br />

view to recognising qualifications of engineers,<br />

architects, town planners, and all other skilled or semiskilled<br />

workers will be immensely beneficial to the<br />

South Asian countries in facilitating trade in construction<br />

services. Having the precedence of India–Singapore<br />

agreement and an agreement in the pipeline with Sri<br />

Lanka, developing MRAs in the sector may not be that<br />

daunting. One bilateral agreement will enable the region<br />

to apply it to all other countries. The most important<br />

point is that since Mode 4 is the most restricted mode<br />

at the regional level the gains will also be most from<br />

liberalising it and MRAs would play an instrumental<br />

role in facilitating the presence of natural persons.<br />

However, since the issue of MRAs is complex it deserves<br />

more detailed discussion and accordingly, this has been<br />

discussed in the Chapter 5.<br />

Classification issue: In view of related professional<br />

services being placed under the business services sector<br />

under W/120 classification, Cuba argues that members<br />

should hold discussions within the purview of the<br />

existing interrelationship between the construction and<br />

related engineering services sector and the professional<br />

services sector with regard to architectural services,<br />

engineering services, integrated engineering services and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!