Report
Report
Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I MPACT OF SAFTA ON MEMBER COUNTRIES: GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS 53<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The results of the simulation indicate that the net<br />
economic impacts of SAFTA are beneficial, as a whole.<br />
However, the following points come out clearly:<br />
• Gains to LDCs are modest in the first phase of<br />
liberalisation.<br />
• LDC gains are significant in the second phase,<br />
provided there is complete liberalisation.<br />
• Bangladesh’s significant gains are in terms of higher<br />
employment in the apparel sector (5%) and leather<br />
sector (3%). Losses are there for some manufacturing<br />
products (electronics, transport and machinery/<br />
equipment).<br />
• Bangladesh’s apparel sector gains more on account<br />
of its increase in global exports.<br />
• SAFTA may give Afghanistan an increased access<br />
to Pakistan’s market.<br />
• Interestingly, increase in gains to Bangladesh’s<br />
wearing apparel sector are more on account of its<br />
improved global exports which increase as much<br />
as 6% on account of SAFTA, presumably because<br />
Bangladesh’s own high textile tariffs are removed.<br />
As a result of SAFTA phase II, Bangladesh’s global<br />
exports of wearing apparel show increase of about<br />
USD million 262 million, of which only USD 3<br />
million are apparel exports to South Asian<br />
countries. Thus 98% of wearing apparel exports<br />
are to the rest of the world. This is also<br />
corroborated by the fact that in SAFTA phase II,<br />
India’s textiles exports to Bangladesh increase by<br />
84%, and from that 90% of India’s total South<br />
Asian textile exports increase goes to Bangladesh.<br />
Similarly with Pakistan, where 95% of the rise in<br />
exports are to Bangladesh.<br />
• ABMN gain in some agricultural and chemical<br />
products. There are losses in manufacturing<br />
including textiles and apparel.<br />
• But overall employment effects are positive for<br />
Bangladesh and ABMN.<br />
• India’s gains are limited to some agricultural sectors<br />
like sugar, poultry, dairy and manufactures like<br />
motor vehicles. There are losses to sectors like<br />
wearing apparel and leather.<br />
• Pakistan gains mainly in wheat, horticulture and<br />
textiles. Losses likely in sugar and wearing apparel.<br />
• Sri Lanka gains are limited since it already has an<br />
FTA with India, and is about to conclude an FTA<br />
with Pakistan.<br />
• Bhutan and Nepal may have only limited gains since<br />
they already have an FTA with India.<br />
• India and Pakistan gain in terms of exports to<br />
Bangladesh.<br />
• India’s gains are not much if Pakistan partially<br />
participates in SAFTA.<br />
• SAFTA is likely to lead to stronger economic<br />
growth, notwithstanding the controversies<br />
pertaining to trade and development policies, and<br />
the mixed results of specific impacts from various<br />
studies<br />
• By ‘locking in’ uniform trade and investment<br />
policies among member countries, an RTA may help<br />
to promote policy credibility. Group action may<br />
influence all members to abide by a common reform<br />
agenda. Of course, RTAs do not guarantee equal<br />
distribution of benefits to members.<br />
• Since India is a large and rapidly growing member<br />
country of SAFTA it has the potential to serve as a<br />
‘growth-pole’ for the region, and could have growth<br />
enhancing effects for the region. This is also due to<br />
the fact that India’s MFN tariffs are among the<br />
highest in the region.<br />
• SAFTA will present firms in member countries with<br />
the opportunity to exploit economies of scale<br />
through access to a enlarged and diversified market.<br />
• The economic benefits from an RTA has been<br />
justified in terms of greater trade creation than trade<br />
diversion by its members. Net trade creation offer<br />
dynamic gains from trade and provide the<br />
fundamental argument for free trade and economic<br />
growth. The GTAP modeling results point to net<br />
welfare gains for the region as a whole and suggests<br />
that SAFTA will be trade creating.<br />
• Intra-SAARC trade was quite small till about 1999,<br />
has grown significantly since then, largely on<br />
account of increased exports from India.<br />
• SAFTA may promote greater rapprochement,<br />
diplomacy and stability. GTAP results suggest that<br />
all countries experience welfare gains, but it would<br />
be important to give flexibilities for countries to<br />
protect their vulnerable sectors – this is particularly<br />
the case for manufacturing sector in the smaller<br />
LDCs.