04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />

maintained one of the most restrictive trade regimes in<br />

the world. It imposed a system of high tariffs and stiff<br />

NTBs such as licensing and quotas, which virtually<br />

closed the economy from the international trade arena.<br />

Far from viewing foreign trade as an engine of economic<br />

growth, Indian planners sought to minimize import<br />

demand and viewed exports mainly to generate the<br />

foreign exchange earnings to meet that part of the<br />

import bill not covered by external assistance. They<br />

created an elaborate administrative regulatory<br />

machinery to control both imports and exports. As a<br />

consequence, both exports and imports as a percentage<br />

of GDP declined. The 1980s can be viewed as a period<br />

of growing uneasiness with the policies of excessive<br />

protectionism. The import needs became stronger as<br />

the industrial growth showed an accelerating<br />

trend. Also, it was realised after the first oil shock<br />

of 1973 that India had to step up exports to finance<br />

the rising import bill on account of an increase in oil<br />

prices.<br />

The 1980s is marked by a clear shift in the trade<br />

strategy towards reduction of quantitative restrictions<br />

on imports. Exports and imports as per cent of GDP<br />

showed an upward trend in 1980s. While the signs of<br />

liberalised trade policy became visible in the latter half<br />

of the decade, it was only in 1991 that the country<br />

embarked on a truly liberalised trade policy with a short<br />

negative list of exports and imports and with quantitative<br />

controls over imports withdrawn for all, except<br />

consumer goods. The reforms included liberalisation<br />

of import licensing, reduction in tariffs, abolition of<br />

cash subsidies for exports, devaluation of the rupee,<br />

introduction of partial convertibility of the rupee on<br />

the current account and later full convertibility of the<br />

rupee on the current account. As a result exports as a<br />

per cent of GDP rose from over 6% level to over 8% in<br />

1990s (Table 1.11). The export momentum slowed<br />

down since 1996–97 due to both global and domestic<br />

factors, however, it again picked up in 2001–02. There<br />

was a significant increase in the share of imports<br />

alongside except for 1991–92 due to the severe import<br />

curbs introduced after the payment crisis of 1991–92.<br />

It can be safely asserted that India’s trade has been<br />

open now compared to that of the pre-reform period,<br />

as the trade to GDP increased from 14.4% in 1980 to<br />

22.8% in 2000. However, when it comes to an international<br />

comparison, India’s trade to GDP ratio is low.<br />

For example, in the People’s Republic of China, share<br />

of trade rose from 12.6% in 1980 to 37% in 1999.<br />

India is an active member of WTO. Although India<br />

has been a strong supporter of multilateral<br />

liberalisation, it has also sought out RTAs in recent<br />

years. Since signing the Bangkok Agreement in 1975,<br />

India has signed trade agreements mainly with other<br />

developing countries such as the global system of trade<br />

preferences (GSTP), SAFTA, and an FTA with Sri<br />

Lanka. India has also signed a comprehensive economic<br />

cooperation agreement (CECA) with ASEAN,<br />

European Union, Japan and Korea.<br />

The Maldives<br />

Maldives is a small island developing nation in the<br />

Indian Ocean. Since its independence in 1965, the<br />

Maldives has achieved commendable economic development.<br />

While the country was one of the poorest in South<br />

Asia in the early 1970s, it now has the highest per<br />

capita income in the region. Maldives per capita GDP<br />

rose from US $266 in 1980 to US $995 in 1990, the<br />

highest as compared to other South Asian economies.<br />

It recorded the per capita GDP of US $2328 in 2005.<br />

The country’s economy is dependent on fishing,<br />

tourism and foreign imports. Tourism is the largest<br />

industry in Maldives, accounting for 20% of GDP and<br />

more than 60% of foreign exchange receipt. It powered<br />

current GDP per capita to expand 265% in the 1980s<br />

and a further 115% in 1990s. Fishing is the second<br />

leading sector in Maldives. While the contribution of<br />

fisheries has been declining over time, it remains vital<br />

to the economy, because it is the main provider of food<br />

items and employment in a number of atolls.<br />

Agriculture and manufacturing play a minor role in<br />

the economy, constrained by the limited availability of<br />

cultivable land and shortage of domestic labor. Most<br />

staple foods are imported.<br />

During 1996–98, the Maldives’ economy grew by<br />

8–9% as a result of favourable development in<br />

transportation, communication, utilities, tourism,<br />

fisheries, and manufacturing, particularly garments. In<br />

1999, growth was estimated at 8.5% (Table 1.12). This<br />

Table 1.11 Exports and Imports as % of GDP, 1980–2003<br />

Year 1980–81 1990–91 1995–96 1996–97 1999–2000 2001–02 2003–04<br />

Exports as % of GDP 4.9 5.8 9.1 8.9 8.4 9.4 10.8<br />

Imports as % of GDP 9.5 8.8 12.3 12.7 12.4 12.0 13.3<br />

Source: Economic Survey, various issues, and Department of Economic Analysis and Policy, RBI.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!