Report
Report
Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
H IGHER EDUCATION SERVICES 149<br />
such frameworks in place in light of the push towards<br />
trade liberalisation and increased cross border delivery<br />
of education. The development of a regulatory<br />
framework to deal with the diversity of providers and<br />
new cross-border delivery modes becomes more critical<br />
as international trade increases. In some countries, this<br />
will likely mean a broader approach to policy which<br />
involves licensing, regulating, monitoring, both private<br />
(profit and non-profit) and foreign providers in order<br />
to ensure that national policy objectives are met and<br />
public interests protected. It has further been suggested<br />
that more work is necessary to determine how domestic/<br />
national regulatory frameworks are compatible with,<br />
or part of a larger international framework and how<br />
they relate to trade agreement rules.<br />
Knight also raises an interesting point that GATS<br />
is facilitating the mobility of professionals to meet the<br />
high demand for skilled workers (Knight 2002). This<br />
impacts many of the service sectors and has particular<br />
implications for the mobility of teachers and scholars<br />
in the higher education sector. In many countries,<br />
Knight argues, the increasing shortage of teachers is<br />
resulting in active recruitment campaigns across<br />
borders. Knight further adds that since many teachers<br />
and researchers want to move to countries with more<br />
favourable working conditions and salaries, there is a<br />
real concern that the most developed countries will<br />
benefit from this mobility of education workers.<br />
However, it could be argued that the solution perhaps<br />
lies in allowing private players to enter the area of<br />
education and not in closing the system to outside<br />
players. Pangariya rightly suggests that only private<br />
universities that can charge hefty fees and attract private<br />
sponsors from home and abroad will be able to afford<br />
salaries necessary to retain top-class scholars and<br />
teachers and create facilities required to promote<br />
excellence in research (Pangariya 2007). Bangladesh<br />
encourages private universities and the result has been<br />
that they have recruited teachers from expatriate<br />
Bangladeshis living in countries like the US and the<br />
UK (interview at the BRAC University, Dhaka,<br />
Bangladesh). Thus what seems to be of paramount<br />
importance is the presence of an efficient regulatory<br />
authority that will ensure quality in education.<br />
In the South Asian context it is important that<br />
regulatory bodies such as the UGC and the AICTE<br />
begin discussing with their counterparts in other<br />
countries of the region to explore the possibility of<br />
having some uniformity in curricula in particularly<br />
technical education which could lead to equivalence of<br />
qualifications and finally to recognition. Although<br />
when thousands of students from Bangladesh,<br />
Nepal, and Sri Lanka are already studying in India<br />
implying that there is some acceptability of the degrees<br />
obtained in India, this has to be given a formal legal<br />
cover.