04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

H IGHER EDUCATION SERVICES 149<br />

such frameworks in place in light of the push towards<br />

trade liberalisation and increased cross border delivery<br />

of education. The development of a regulatory<br />

framework to deal with the diversity of providers and<br />

new cross-border delivery modes becomes more critical<br />

as international trade increases. In some countries, this<br />

will likely mean a broader approach to policy which<br />

involves licensing, regulating, monitoring, both private<br />

(profit and non-profit) and foreign providers in order<br />

to ensure that national policy objectives are met and<br />

public interests protected. It has further been suggested<br />

that more work is necessary to determine how domestic/<br />

national regulatory frameworks are compatible with,<br />

or part of a larger international framework and how<br />

they relate to trade agreement rules.<br />

Knight also raises an interesting point that GATS<br />

is facilitating the mobility of professionals to meet the<br />

high demand for skilled workers (Knight 2002). This<br />

impacts many of the service sectors and has particular<br />

implications for the mobility of teachers and scholars<br />

in the higher education sector. In many countries,<br />

Knight argues, the increasing shortage of teachers is<br />

resulting in active recruitment campaigns across<br />

borders. Knight further adds that since many teachers<br />

and researchers want to move to countries with more<br />

favourable working conditions and salaries, there is a<br />

real concern that the most developed countries will<br />

benefit from this mobility of education workers.<br />

However, it could be argued that the solution perhaps<br />

lies in allowing private players to enter the area of<br />

education and not in closing the system to outside<br />

players. Pangariya rightly suggests that only private<br />

universities that can charge hefty fees and attract private<br />

sponsors from home and abroad will be able to afford<br />

salaries necessary to retain top-class scholars and<br />

teachers and create facilities required to promote<br />

excellence in research (Pangariya 2007). Bangladesh<br />

encourages private universities and the result has been<br />

that they have recruited teachers from expatriate<br />

Bangladeshis living in countries like the US and the<br />

UK (interview at the BRAC University, Dhaka,<br />

Bangladesh). Thus what seems to be of paramount<br />

importance is the presence of an efficient regulatory<br />

authority that will ensure quality in education.<br />

In the South Asian context it is important that<br />

regulatory bodies such as the UGC and the AICTE<br />

begin discussing with their counterparts in other<br />

countries of the region to explore the possibility of<br />

having some uniformity in curricula in particularly<br />

technical education which could lead to equivalence of<br />

qualifications and finally to recognition. Although<br />

when thousands of students from Bangladesh,<br />

Nepal, and Sri Lanka are already studying in India<br />

implying that there is some acceptability of the degrees<br />

obtained in India, this has to be given a formal legal<br />

cover.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!