Report
Report
Report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
9 Quantification of Benefits from Transport<br />
and Trade Facilitation in South Asia 1<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The increase in trade across the world since the past<br />
several decades was driven by several very diverse<br />
factors which countries consciously pursued, including<br />
the reduction in legal trade barriers and defining of<br />
international standards for products, manufacturing<br />
and services, among others. Countries pursued trade<br />
liberalisation measures since they were convinced that<br />
the positive benefits from opening up trade and tariff<br />
reduction for the country as a whole outweighed the<br />
negative effects on the protected domestic producers<br />
and loss of revenue for the government. Trade was<br />
further facilitated but falling transportation costs over<br />
time which allowed firms to base manufacturing<br />
facilities in countries which were able to offer them the<br />
optimum low-cost mix of technology, labour, and<br />
capital at basic minimum standards.<br />
In the context of regional trading blocs, these<br />
benefits from trade sometimes need to be quantified<br />
and demonstrated to all trading partners in order to<br />
induce them to participate in the liberalisation process.<br />
However, benefits from improved transport and trade<br />
facilitation measures bring obvious win-win outcomes<br />
for all trading partners, subject to certain conditions.<br />
High trade costs such as transportation charges,<br />
documentation requirements, and clearance delays at<br />
the borders have a discouraging impact on trade and<br />
production similar to trade restrictions such as tariffs<br />
and quotas. A country’s ability to deliver goods and<br />
services in a timely manner at low cost is the key to its<br />
export competitiveness. It also promotes imports and<br />
foreign direct investment which encourages innovations<br />
in technology. Trade and transport facilitation measures<br />
targeted at improved trade logistics through simplification<br />
of customs procedures and enhanced connectivity<br />
bring direct benefits to business, which includes<br />
the faster clearance and release of goods, costs cutting<br />
and reduced delays, increased transparency and integrity,<br />
and enhanced competitiveness. 2 The benefits in<br />
the form of savings of time and reduced costs to the<br />
trading partners help the economy to grow fast. Further,<br />
since inefficient trading procedures act as NTBs to<br />
trade, improved trade and transport facilitation reduces<br />
the scope for illegal trade and corruption. Trade facilitation<br />
measures also provide participating countries<br />
safeguards against sometimes conflicting national<br />
measures imposed by individual countries.<br />
Given the various issues of trade and transport<br />
facilitation in South Asia, this chapter quantifies gains<br />
from cooperation identified regional projects using<br />
BCA. 3 Although regional in nature, the benefits are<br />
computed for one country which is undertaking the<br />
project on its territory in order to provide a flavour of<br />
1<br />
Useful comments and inputs have been provided by Prabir De at the Research and Information System for Developing<br />
Countries (RIS), New Delhi, T. Keshawrani and K.L. Thukral at the Asian Institute of Transport Development, New<br />
Delhi, and Saikat Sinha Roy at Jadavpur University. Bhishma Rout’s assistance in procuring data and documents is much<br />
appreciated.<br />
2<br />
http://www.dti.gov.uk/europeandtrade/key-trade-issues/trade-facilitation/page22745.html<br />
3<br />
BCA involves the aggregation of the present value of the time-streams of all benefits and costs expected generated by the<br />
proposed project (James, 2005). The three steps involved for the BCA are as follows: compile costs of the project; calculate<br />
all possible monetary benefits of the project; and calculate present value of net benefits from the project. The time-stream of<br />
total costs is depicted as C 1<br />
, C 2<br />
, . . . C n<br />
, and total benefits as B 1<br />
, B 2<br />
, . . ., B n<br />
over an ‘n’ year time period. The stream of net<br />
benefits (B 1<br />
– C 1<br />
), (B 2<br />
– C 2<br />
), . . ., (Bn – C n<br />
), where all values of C t<br />
are 0 after costs are incurred. The present value (NPV) of is<br />
the sum of discounted net benefits, where the discounted net benefit for any year t is obtained by dividing each net benefit<br />
value (e.g. B 2<br />
– C 2<br />
) by (1 + r) t where r is the social ‘discount’ rate. NPV = Σ t<br />
(Bt – Ct)/(1+r) t .