04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I MPACT OF SAFTA ON INWARD AND OUTWARD FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS 65<br />

more eager to invest in Bangladesh than before. TATA’s<br />

US$ 2 billion investment proposal is such an example.<br />

State-controlled Bangladesh Power Development Board<br />

will implement the project and the ADB has said it will<br />

provide a $110 million loan for the project. The<br />

government also formed an expert committee to explore<br />

the possibility of a power purchase.<br />

Within the total investment coming from the South<br />

Asia region to Bangladesh, Pakistan was the single<br />

largest source (79%) in 2005 (US$ 25.5 million), while<br />

Indian investment of US$ 1 million was the single largest<br />

source (47%) in 2006 (Table 8.4).<br />

Sri Lanka<br />

Examining the bilateral trend in FDI between the<br />

SAFTA member countries we find that India is an<br />

important source of FDI to Sri Lanka and ranks<br />

amongst the top five investors with 164 projects valued<br />

at Rs 32 billion as of 2006 according to the Board of<br />

Investment (BOI). Most of the FDI (over 60%) from<br />

India has been in the services sector. Comparatively<br />

small investments have been made by Bangladesh in<br />

the services sector.<br />

In fact, Sri Lanka has long been a priority destination<br />

for direct investment by Indian businesses within<br />

the SAARC region. Over 50% of Indian joint ventures<br />

and wholly owned subsidiaries in the region are located<br />

in Sri Lanka. Of the total equity invested by Indian<br />

companies in regional joint ventures, 54% are located<br />

in Sri Lanka. The number of approved projects which<br />

stood at 23 in 1991 with an estimated investment of<br />

SLRs 740 million was mainly confined to small and<br />

medium steel rolling mills, chemicals, rubber products<br />

and service sector projects. By the end of June 2000,<br />

however, the number of projects had leaped to 120 with<br />

an estimated investment of SLRs 12.5 billion.<br />

The principal sectors which have attracted Indian<br />

investment are steel, cement, rubber products, tourism,<br />

computer software, IT-training and other professional<br />

services. During the past three years, leading Indian<br />

companies such as Gujarat Ambuja, Asian Paints and<br />

Larsen and Toubro have committed substantial investments,<br />

while existing companies – CEAT and Taj<br />

Hotels, for example – have expanded their operations.<br />

Sri Lanka’s Board of Investment has given approval<br />

for India’s largest publicly-listed telecom firm, Bharti<br />

Airtel, to be the island’s fifth mobile phone operator<br />

with an investment of 150 million dollars in May 2007.<br />

Some illustrations have been given in Table 8.3. Even<br />

Sri Lankan firms are interested in investment in India.<br />

Brandix Lanka (Sri Lanka’s largest exporter with shipments<br />

exceeding US$ 320 million), and MAS Holdings<br />

(which together with its joint venture partners has a turnover<br />

of around US$ 700 million) are setting up textile<br />

and apparel industrial parks offering a one-stop-shop<br />

to potential investors. These parks will enjoy all the benefits<br />

of operating in one of India’s SEZs, which operate<br />

as duty-free enclaves treated as a foreign territory. Brandix<br />

foresees Sri Lanka as the hub for all front-end and product<br />

development activities, while exploiting the scale<br />

advantages offered by India.<br />

India<br />

India is one of the SAARC countries where overseas<br />

investment policy has been substantially liberalised in<br />

recent years. Indian companies can invest up to US$<br />

100 million (US$ 150 million SAARC countries, excluding<br />

Pakistan and Myanmar and up to Rs 7000 million<br />

by way of rupee investments in Nepal and Bhutan) in a<br />

year without approval of RBI or GoI provided the overseas<br />

investment is not real estate-oriented. Funding of<br />

such investments can be out of balances held in<br />

Exchange Earners Foreign Currency Account (EEFC)<br />

of the Indian Company or 100% of ADR/GDR proceeds<br />

or withdrawal of foreign exchange from an authorised<br />

dealers in India up to 200% of the not worth of<br />

the Indian company<br />

India’s investment in South Asian countries was US$<br />

164.53 million during the period 1996–2002, being<br />

no more than a little over 2% of its overseas world<br />

investment. Nepal was the most important destination<br />

of Indian investment followed by Sri Lanka. Since 2002<br />

however Sri Lanka has overtaken Nepal as India’s<br />

largest investment destination in South Asia (Raihan<br />

2006).<br />

By virtue of its proximity and the Trade Treaty with<br />

India, close economic linkages between India and Nepal<br />

have manifested themselves, inter-alia, through Indian<br />

investment and joint ventures in Nepal. Government<br />

of India has established a special ‘Nepal Window’ to<br />

facilitate approvals for Indian investment in Nepal and<br />

the limit for ‘fast track’ approval by Reserve Bank of<br />

India for investments in Nepal has been raised in July<br />

2000 to Rs 350 crore (Indian currency). In 2000 there<br />

were over 265 approved Indian joint ventures in Nepal<br />

of which over 100 are operational, with a cumulative<br />

total Indian investment amounting between 36 and<br />

40% of the total FDI in Nepal. In 2004 there were 114<br />

operational Indian joint ventures in Nepal with<br />

authorised capital of NR 14.33 billion. Of these, 22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!