04.01.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />

persons in locally incorporated companies are not transferable<br />

without prior permission by the government of<br />

Bhutan.<br />

Although for a country of Bhutan’s size undertaking<br />

commitments in education should be appreciated, these<br />

commitments have to be critically analysed from the<br />

point of view of a foreign services provider. In view of<br />

this, the Bhutanese commitments do not seem to be<br />

liberal. The first and foremost problem with these<br />

commitments is that there are too many restrictions in<br />

the sectoral as well as horizontal commitments. In fact,<br />

question could be asked why would any foreign investor<br />

decide to invest in Bhutan when there are so many<br />

barriers. These barriers are also equally relevant in the<br />

case of South Asia and it is interesting to note that India<br />

and to a limited extent Bangladesh are already involved<br />

in providing education services to the Bhutanese<br />

students. In fact, South Asian countries could be major<br />

investors in Bhutan’s education services. Bhutan should<br />

remove some of the Mode 3 restrictions particularly<br />

mentioned in the horizontal section. Similarly, it is hard<br />

to understand why Bhutan has inscribed unbound<br />

under Modes 1, 2 and 3 in its sectoral commitments in<br />

the National Treatment column. Mode 1 would be of<br />

much interest to the other South Asian countries and<br />

hence Bhutan needs to take full commitment in the<br />

National Treatment column of its sectoral<br />

commitments.<br />

Summary of Restrictions in the Sector<br />

• No commitments under Mode 1<br />

• A number of restrictions under Mode 3 such as<br />

foreign equity cap of 51%, services can be provided<br />

jointly with local educationists, etc.<br />

• No commitments under Mode 4.<br />

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS<br />

From South Asia India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka,<br />

and Bhutan have so far either undertaken commitments<br />

or have offered to do so in education services as part<br />

of the ongoing services negotiations. However,<br />

Bangladesh and the Maldives are the two South Asian<br />

countries which have not shown any willingness to<br />

bind-in their autonomous liberalisation undertaken in<br />

the sector. While there is a study suggesting that<br />

Bangladesh has strong import interests in education<br />

services and hence should undertake commitments,<br />

there does not seem to be any such study on the<br />

Maldives suggesting about its possible move under the<br />

GATS. The World Bank and others have strongly<br />

argued that the Maldives lacks skilled labour force and<br />

only a handful of its students have the opportunity of<br />

studying at higher education level. There is also<br />

evidence that Maldivian students going abroad is a<br />

trend for seeking higher education. There are plausible<br />

reasons for the Maldives to make commitments under<br />

the GATS.<br />

At the South Asian level there is a dearth of educational<br />

institutions providing higher education particularly<br />

in management, engineering, medical and other<br />

technical education. The excess of demand is manifested<br />

in the region-wide trend of students going abroad<br />

especially to Western countries for education. A liberal<br />

Mode 3 regime in these countries would certainly play<br />

the role of import substitution by providing far cheaper<br />

education as compared to what the Western institutions<br />

provide.<br />

Similarly, lack of qualified teachers at higher education<br />

level affecting the quality of education seems to be<br />

a regional characteristic. It could be suggested that apart<br />

from allowing teachers to move freely across the region,<br />

training teachers at regular intervals in better institutions<br />

will help tackle the problem. Not surprisingly<br />

teacher training is one of the areas selected by SAARC<br />

to work on.<br />

There is already trade in education taking place in<br />

South Asia and India is clearly the leading exporter of<br />

education at the regional level. Several thousand<br />

students from Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka come<br />

to India every year for education. Under the SAARC<br />

arrangement India is providing some concessions to<br />

the students from this region studying in select governmental<br />

institutions. In the possible regional agreement<br />

some mechanism could be developed to give concessions<br />

to South Asian students studying even in private<br />

institutes too. This will make the South Asian education<br />

more attractive for students.<br />

There is immense scope for delivery of education<br />

via Mode 1. As already discussed, this can take many<br />

forms. However, distance education and education<br />

particularly via internet are of great significance to the<br />

region. In fact, this has special developmental perspective<br />

as education via this route is found to be several<br />

times less expensive than through conventional mode.<br />

It has been suggested that quality and accreditation<br />

are at the heart of this debate (Knight 2002). The<br />

importance of frameworks for licensing, accreditation,<br />

qualification recognition and quality assurance are<br />

important for all countries whether they are importing<br />

and exporting education services. Developing countries<br />

have expressed concern about their capacity to have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!