Report
Report
Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
88 QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS FROM ECONOMIC COOPERATION IN SOUTH ASIA<br />
The Potential<br />
The potential for Colombo Port comes not from<br />
increased Indo-Sri Lanka trade but from its potential<br />
as being a hub for trade from South Asian countries to<br />
the rest of the world. The Sri Lanka port authority<br />
(SLPA) aims for the Colombo Port to become a<br />
significant international player providing market-driven<br />
facilities and services to shipping lines. ADB (2007)<br />
estimates Colombo saw rapid growth in the early 1990s<br />
which averaged 20% per annum until 1998 when the<br />
growth stopped and the overall traffic volume remained<br />
static at about 1.7 million TEU per year despite India’s<br />
accelerated GDP growth. It was only in 2003 that<br />
growth resumed at 11%. The main reasons for stagnation<br />
of container traffic are attributed to increased direct<br />
calls JNPT; competition from the new ports of Salalah,<br />
Aden, Tanjung Pelepas and Port Klang; high tariff levels<br />
at Colombo compared with competing ports, and<br />
failure to respond to falling prices; civil strife; low<br />
operational efficiency: low productivity, congestion and<br />
ship delay at the port.<br />
ADB (2007) forecasts a positive business climate<br />
for Colombo Port. The container traffic forecast for<br />
container traffic both from domestic and Indian subcontinent<br />
(i.e. Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan) sources<br />
is shown in Table 9.20. It is noted that the economic<br />
growth of Indian subcontinent economies and the<br />
resulting growth in their import and export trades is<br />
the fundamental determinant of container transshipment<br />
volumes originating from these economies and<br />
hence Colombo Port’s traffic opportunity.<br />
Table 9.20 Forecast of Traffic at Colombo Port<br />
(000’ TEU)<br />
Indian Sub-Continent Container Transshipments<br />
Domestic Forecast % Trans- TEU (000)<br />
Container shipped via Trans-<br />
Growth Colombo, shipped<br />
Forecast<br />
Singapore,<br />
Salalah, etc.<br />
2002 546* 4,739* 45* 2,133*<br />
2005 727 6,658 39 2,597<br />
2010 1,118 11,219 35 3,927<br />
2015 1,643 17,262 33 5,696<br />
2020 2,414 24,211 30 7,263<br />
2030 4,975 47,626 26 12,383<br />
2040 9,786 93,688 16 14,990<br />
Note: * represents actuals which was used as the base for<br />
projections. 2040 forecast assumes unconstrained by<br />
port capacity limitations (000 TEU).<br />
Source: ADB (2007)<br />
It is expected that the potential transshipment share<br />
of the Indian subcontinent market will decline over time<br />
due to increased direct calls. ADB’s Colombo South<br />
Harbor project represents a landmark in project<br />
procurement and inward investment as well as recognising<br />
necessary reform. The impacts upon Colombo are<br />
expected to be significant, not only to the port users<br />
but to the entire community.<br />
The Colombo port also needs to cater to the<br />
increase in domestic exports. Overall, Sri Lanka’s<br />
exports accounted for 28% of GDP and imports for<br />
37% in 2005. Almost all national imports and exports<br />
are containerised. Most exports are destined for Europe<br />
and the US. However, imports are often materials for<br />
use in export industry and they come from the Far East<br />
and significantly from the Indian sub-continent.<br />
Hence potential to expand the Colombo port needs<br />
to consider the following points (ADB 2007):<br />
• Significant volumes of Bay of Bengal container<br />
cargo are transshipping across Singapore or Port<br />
Klang for Europe and North America which is<br />
probably more expensive and longer than<br />
transshipment at Colombo. Colombo needs to<br />
investigate ways of supporting and encouraging<br />
more frequent and more regular feeder services,<br />
notably to Chittagong by offering other special<br />
deals.<br />
• Capacity limitations at JNPT are prompting carriers<br />
to seek alternatives. Colombo offers a real<br />
alternative for European and Far Eastern cargoes<br />
and current users of JNPT should be targeted.<br />
• The potential for partnering with a range of small<br />
ports, of which Vizag could be a key example, to<br />
modify cargo flows for joint benefit requires<br />
investigation. This must be done in a way that does<br />
not adversely affect other significant port<br />
relationships.<br />
• The port is a national asset which should promote<br />
contacts with local exporters, importers and<br />
development agencies by demonstrating to them<br />
how the port is able to assist them. The growth of<br />
national cargo base is an important objective and<br />
direct foreign investment in local industrial exportoriented<br />
business is to be encouraged<br />
The Project<br />
ADB’s Colombo Port Expansion Project aims at the<br />
enhancement of operational efficiency at all of<br />
Colombo port’s container terminals and investment in