10.01.2014 Views

Sykes' History of Persia Vol 2 (pdf) - Heritage Institute

Sykes' History of Persia Vol 2 (pdf) - Heritage Institute

Sykes' History of Persia Vol 2 (pdf) - Heritage Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

450 HISTORY OF PERSIA<br />

be deducted from the debt. The Shah swallowed the bait<br />

and accepted these proposals, but the Russian Minister<br />

had to reckon with the Sadr-i-Aazam. That astute individual<br />

pointed out that, if it was open to <strong>Persia</strong> to<br />

co-operate with Russia, it was equally open to join Turkey.<br />

He added that, if Great Britain and France intervened<br />

on her side, <strong>Persia</strong> might be able to sweep away the<br />

humiliating treaty <strong>of</strong> Turkomanchai and win back the lost<br />

provinces. The Shah was convinced by<br />

this reasoning,<br />

and, although orders had actually been issued for assembling<br />

forces in the provinces <strong>of</strong> Azerbaijan and Kermanshah, it<br />

was now decided to watch events and not to commit <strong>Persia</strong><br />

definitely. This veering round on the part <strong>of</strong> the Shah<br />

deeply chagrined Prince Dolgoruki, who vented his wrath<br />

on the Sadr-i-Aazam. Nasir-u-Din made overtures to<br />

Great Britain and France, and was advised by those Powers,<br />

which had now joined in the Russo-Turkish war, to remain<br />

neutral. This counsel, which was most displeasing<br />

to its<br />

recipient and to the Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>Persia</strong>, caused the Sadr-i-<br />

Aazam to view the Russian proposals with less disfavour.<br />

Possibly he realized that it was dangerous to thwart Russia,<br />

and possibly<br />

also the lack <strong>of</strong> energy and vigour with which<br />

the war was waged by Great Britain, which did not make<br />

any use <strong>of</strong> her Indian army, influenced him in the same<br />

direction.<br />

The Breach with Great Britain, 1855. <strong>Persia</strong> was<br />

undoubtedly annoyed with Great Britain, but the trifling<br />

question which divided the two governments need not in<br />

itself have caused a rupture. It is not impossible that it<br />

was intentionally used for that purpose but it is ; equally<br />

possible<br />

that the breach to which it led was not foreseen<br />

or intended by the <strong>Persia</strong>n Government. In 1854 the<br />

British Legation had engaged as <strong>Persia</strong>n Secretary a<br />

certain Mirza Hashim Khan, who had formerly been in<br />

<strong>Persia</strong>n employment but had quitted<br />

the service some<br />

years before. The Sadr-i-Aazam objected to his holding<br />

the post, and this point was yielded, as it was obviously<br />

undesirable to<br />

employ as a go-between an individual<br />

who was disliked by the <strong>Persia</strong>n Minister. When the<br />

Sadr-i-Aazam first expressed his wishes on the subject, he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!