28.01.2014 Views

N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N

N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N

N-(1,3-Dimethylbutyl)-N

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OECD SIDS<br />

N-(1,3-DIMETHYLBUTYL)-N´-PHENYL-1,4-PHENYLENEDIAMINE<br />

In an unpublished report (Monsanto Chemical Co., 1987) rats were dosed via gavage from<br />

GD 6 - 15 with 0, 50, 100 or 250 mg/kg bw/day. In mid- and high-dosed dams increased salivation,<br />

soft stools, diarrhea, reduced defecation, and greenish stools were seen, while no teratogenic or<br />

embryo/fetotoxic effects were observed at any treatment level. From this study NOAEL values for<br />

maternal toxicity and teratogenicity of 50 and 250 mg/kg bw/day (highest dose tested) were<br />

derived.<br />

Conclusion: There are no indications for teratogenic or developmental effects up to oral doses of<br />

250 mg/kg bw/day in rats (highest dose tested). Exposure during the gestation period demonstrated<br />

the absence of a fetotoxic or teratogenic potential and of maternal toxicity in rabbits for doses up to<br />

30 mg/kg bw/day (highest dose tested)..<br />

3.1.9 Experience with Human Exposure<br />

A range of older studies performed by chemical industry report from patch-tests in humans applying<br />

a repeated insult patch test (method of Shelanski) or a modified Schwartz patch test. In healthy<br />

volunteers not previously exposed to test rubber formulations, no sensitization or only a low<br />

sensitization rate to 6PPD was noted, while the sensitization rate was much higher in persons who<br />

had been previously sensitized to rubber samples.<br />

Sensitization in the course of repeated insult patch-tests (induction by 15 repeated treatments<br />

followed by one challenge application) was reported for groups of 17/50 and 16/50 individuals<br />

(Industrial Biology Laboratories Inc., 1964 a) as well as for 4/50 and 5/50 individuals (Industrial<br />

Biology Laboratories Inc., 1964 c; Product Investigations Inc., 1976). Otherwise under similar test<br />

conditions groups of 50 volunteer subjects (not previously exposed to p-phenylenediaminederivatives<br />

or to test rubber formulations) all showed negative patch-test reactions to 6PPD in 3<br />

studies (Industrial Biology Laboratories Inc., 1964 b; Food and Drug Research Laboratories Inc.,<br />

1972; Monsanto Chemical Co., not dated, b).<br />

Positive results to 6PPD challenge were also noted in modified Schwartz patch tests for 3/10, 5/10,<br />

9/10 and 3/5 volunteer subjects, respectively, who had been previously sensitized to rubber samples<br />

(Industrial Biology Laboratories Inc., 1963 a, 1963 b, 1963 c, 1964 d).<br />

The positive patch-test reactions to 6PPD may be a consequence of para-group cross-sensitization:<br />

9 farmers with contact allergy due to rubber boots were patch-tested with 19 rubber additives<br />

according to ICDRG criteria. 5/9 contact dermatitis patients showed a positive reaction to 6PPD<br />

besides cross-sensitization to N-isopropyl-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine, p-phenylenediamine and<br />

p-aminoazobenzene (Nishioka et al., 1996). Positive patch-test results were also reported in 6/135<br />

patients partly with cross-sensitzation to other rubber additives (Heise et al., 1997). 15 patients that<br />

had been tested positive to IPPD also showed a reaction to 6PPD (Herve-Bazin et al., 1977).<br />

Conclusion: 6PPD was found to induce dermal sensitization in humans. Positive patch-test results in<br />

humans partly may be related to para-group cross-sensitization.<br />

3.2 Initial Assessment for Human Health<br />

According to the OECD guideline study the acute oral toxicity of 6PPD is moderate (LD 50 500-<br />

1000 mg/kg bw).<br />

The acute dermal toxicity of 6PPD is low (LD 50 > 3000 mg/kg bw).<br />

The skin irritating potential 6PPD is low. 6PPD is slightly irritating to the eye.<br />

UNEP PUBLICATIONS 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!