The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...
The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...
The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Educational Atta<strong>in</strong>ment and Public Revenues and Costs 77<br />
Table 7.2<br />
<strong>Benefits</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Taxpayers</strong> <strong>from</strong> Increas<strong>in</strong>g Educational Atta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>from</strong> Less Than High School<br />
<strong>to</strong> High School Graduate, U.S.-Born Men and Women (2002 $, thousands)<br />
Increased<br />
Tax Payments<br />
Reduced<br />
Social Program<br />
Spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Reduced<br />
Incarceration<br />
Spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Total Benefit<br />
Estimated<br />
Net Benefit<br />
25 Percent<br />
Reduction<br />
Whites<br />
Men 54 22 13 89 74 51<br />
Women 50 41 2 93 78 54<br />
Asians<br />
Men 50 37 1 89 74 51<br />
Women 52 49 0 101 86 60<br />
Blacks<br />
Men 40 38 123 201 186 134<br />
Women 38 64 10 113 98 69<br />
Hispanics<br />
Men 46 26 35 107 92 64<br />
Women 44 50 4 98 83 57<br />
SOURCE: Appendixes B, C, and D.<br />
dropout <strong>to</strong> high school graduate generally yield greater benefits <strong>to</strong> taxpayers than do<br />
comparable <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a woman’s education. <strong>The</strong> benefits <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased education do<br />
not differ much across racial/ethnic groups.<br />
Table 7.2 also shows what would be the net benefit <strong>to</strong> taxpayers if the effects of<br />
an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education on public revenues and costs were 25 percent smaller than<br />
our estimates. With a 25-percent-smaller estimate of the effect of education level, the<br />
net benefit <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g a person’s education <strong>from</strong> high school dropout <strong>to</strong> high school<br />
graduate would be 14 <strong>to</strong> 37 percent smaller. Even if our estimates of the effects of the<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education on public revenues and costs were 25 percent <strong>to</strong>o high, taxpayers<br />
would realize net benefits <strong>to</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education level <strong>from</strong> high school dropout<br />
<strong>to</strong> high school graduate of at least $51,000 (U.S.-born Asian man) and as much as<br />
$134,000 (U.S.-born black man).<br />
Table 7.3 shows the benefits <strong>to</strong> taxpayers of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g education <strong>from</strong> high school<br />
graduate <strong>to</strong> some college. <strong>Increases</strong> <strong>in</strong> a man’s education <strong>from</strong> high school graduate <strong>to</strong><br />
some college generally yield somewhat greater benefits <strong>to</strong> taxpayers than do comparable<br />
<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> a woman’s education. <strong>The</strong> benefits <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased education do not differ<br />
much across racial/ethnic groups.<br />
Here, <strong>to</strong>o, we conducted a sensitivity analysis <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e the extent <strong>to</strong> which<br />
the estimated effect of the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education on net benefits <strong>to</strong> taxpayers was sensi-