15.02.2014 Views

The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...

The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...

The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Benefits</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Taxpayers</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>Increases</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Students</strong>’ Educational Atta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />

how the amount of welfare benefits she receives would change as she ages. <strong>The</strong>y peak<br />

when she is <strong>in</strong> her late twenties and decrease steadily after that.<br />

If the same woman earned a bachelor’s degree, at age 20 she would receive no<br />

welfare benefits—a sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>to</strong> the public budget of more than $300. <strong>The</strong> amount of<br />

benefits she receives over her lifetime is represented by the bot<strong>to</strong>m, dotted l<strong>in</strong>e on the<br />

chart.<br />

If the same woman <strong>in</strong> our example graduated <strong>from</strong> high school or attended some<br />

college, her welfare benefits over the course of her lifetime would beg<strong>in</strong> at around $100<br />

per year at age 20, hold nearly steady for several years, and decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> middle age.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most dramatic f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g illustrated by the chart is that a Hispanic woman who<br />

earns at least a high school diploma receives far less <strong>in</strong> welfare benefits over the course<br />

of her lifetime than she would if she dropped out of high school. In addition, the difference<br />

between high school graduation and dropp<strong>in</strong>g out is more dramatic than the<br />

differences between any other of the levels of education <strong>in</strong> our study. This is true for all<br />

groups, regardless of gender, race/ethnicity, and place of birth.<br />

Effects of Educational Atta<strong>in</strong>ment on the Costs of Hous<strong>in</strong>g Subsidies<br />

HUD ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a public hous<strong>in</strong>g program through which it provides rental hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>to</strong> low-<strong>in</strong>come families at low cost. In addition, HUD adm<strong>in</strong>isters the Section 8 Rental<br />

Voucher Program, which is <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>to</strong> help very low-<strong>in</strong>come families obta<strong>in</strong> decent<br />

and safe rental hous<strong>in</strong>g. Eligibility for both of these programs relates <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>come level<br />

and lack of available low-cost hous<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

We consider the two programs—the public hous<strong>in</strong>g program and Section 8<br />

Rental Voucher program—<strong>to</strong>gether <strong>in</strong> our analysis because they have similar criteria<br />

for participation and come <strong>from</strong> the budget of the same federal department. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>to</strong> the SIPP data, 4 percent of <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> 2002 resided <strong>in</strong> public hous<strong>in</strong>g, 2 percent<br />

received rental assistance, and slightly less than 1 percent used both benefits. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>to</strong> our analysis of HUD data for 2002, per-resident cost of public hous<strong>in</strong>g and Section<br />

8 programs averaged $2,233 per year.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results show that the largest public sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> subsidized hous<strong>in</strong>g occurs<br />

between high school dropouts and high school graduates, across all gender, race/<br />

ethnicity, and place-of-birth groups. Figure 4.2 illustrates the results. It shows the difference<br />

<strong>in</strong> the costs of annual public hous<strong>in</strong>g subsidies for a U.S-born Hispanic woman<br />

as a function of her age and education level.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g on hous<strong>in</strong>g for women who atta<strong>in</strong> a higher level of education<br />

are higher than for men, but by a marg<strong>in</strong> of 50–100 percent, a much more<br />

modest difference compared with the differences between men and women <strong>in</strong> most<br />

other social support programs. <strong>The</strong> cost of a unit of hous<strong>in</strong>g is assumed <strong>to</strong> be the same<br />

for men and women, so it may be that this difference is due <strong>to</strong> the fact that women use

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!