15.02.2014 Views

The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...

The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...

The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Analytic Approach 15<br />

effects of education on earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity. All agree that <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> education resulted<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity. While the results differ slightly depend<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

approach and data, the common f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is that an additional year of school<strong>in</strong>g leads,<br />

on average, <strong>to</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease of 7–10 percent <strong>in</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity.<br />

Card (1999) provides a thorough review of related economics literature, focus<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on models and estimation results <strong>from</strong> several different estimation approaches. He also<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ds that studies generally agree that education has a positive causal effect on earn<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

capacity. In a separate, more recent review of the benefits of education, Krueger and<br />

L<strong>in</strong>dahl (2001) conclude that each additional year of school<strong>in</strong>g appears <strong>to</strong> raise earn<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

capacity by about 10 percent.<br />

Calculations of the effect of education level on earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity have been challenged<br />

on the grounds that the calculations are biased. Specifically, some critics ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />

that <strong>in</strong>dividuals with greater ability (e.g., because of greater <strong>in</strong>telligence or more<br />

aggressive attitudes) choose <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong> more education, and so it is the fact that they have<br />

greater ability <strong>in</strong> the first place, rather than their additional education, that accounts<br />

for their higher earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity. However, studies generally f<strong>in</strong>d a higher impact of<br />

education on earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity, <strong>in</strong>stead of a lower one, when tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account such<br />

potential biases. <strong>The</strong>se tests for causality <strong>in</strong>clude studies that <strong>in</strong>clude data on attitudes<br />

and other fac<strong>to</strong>rs that could <strong>in</strong>fluence earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity and studies of tw<strong>in</strong>s and sibl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

that completed different levels of education (Rouse, 2005). <strong>The</strong>se studies f<strong>in</strong>d, for<br />

example, that persons with high <strong>in</strong>nate ability who term<strong>in</strong>ate their education at a low<br />

level, possibly because of family f<strong>in</strong>ancial circumstances, do better <strong>in</strong> the labor market<br />

than others with lesser ability who complete the same level of school<strong>in</strong>g. Conversely,<br />

persons with low ability who drift through several levels of school<strong>in</strong>g tend <strong>to</strong> earn less<br />

than others with higher ability who complete the same level of school<strong>in</strong>g. This strongly<br />

suggests that education does have a causal effect on earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity, whether we consider<br />

personal ability or not.<br />

Estimates of the effect of education level on earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity, us<strong>in</strong>g “simple”<br />

methods that do not take <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account potential ability and background bias, range<br />

<strong>from</strong> 2 <strong>to</strong> 11 percent greater earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity per year of school<strong>in</strong>g and cluster around<br />

7 percent. Estimates that take those biases <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account f<strong>in</strong>d that each additional year<br />

of school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creases earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity by 5 <strong>to</strong> 14 percent and cluster around 10 percent.<br />

For example, Ashenfelter, Harmon, and Oosterbeek (1999) f<strong>in</strong>d a 6.6 percent<br />

and 9.3 percent <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs capacity us<strong>in</strong>g simple and advanced methods,<br />

respectively.<br />

Most of these studies that we reviewed were completed <strong>in</strong> the 1990s and used data<br />

<strong>from</strong> the 1980s and 1990s. Because the differences <strong>in</strong> the wages and salaries paid <strong>to</strong><br />

persons with different levels of school<strong>in</strong>g have generally <strong>in</strong>creased over time, these studies’<br />

estimates understate the current effects of education level on earn<strong>in</strong>gs. Table 2.1<br />

shows the ratios of median weekly earn<strong>in</strong>gs by educational atta<strong>in</strong>ment for men and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!