The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...
The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...
The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
58 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Benefits</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Taxpayers</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>Increases</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Students</strong>’ Educational Atta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />
Figure 4.10<br />
2002 Value of Lifetime Decrease <strong>in</strong> Social Program Spend<strong>in</strong>g Result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>from</strong> Increased<br />
Education for U.S.-Born Women<br />
150,000<br />
Lifetime decrease <strong>in</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g (2002 $)<br />
125,000<br />
100,000<br />
75,000<br />
50,000<br />
25,000<br />
Bachelor’s degree<br />
Some college<br />
High school graduate<br />
<strong>RAND</strong> MG686-4.10<br />
0<br />
White Asian Black Hispanic<br />
NOTES: <strong>The</strong> figure shows the value of decreases <strong>in</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g relative <strong>to</strong> that for a high school<br />
dropout. Dollar amounts are expressed <strong>in</strong> 2002 dollars discounted <strong>to</strong> age 18 us<strong>in</strong>g a 3 percent<br />
real discount rate.<br />
Sensitivity Analysis<br />
To explore the extent <strong>to</strong> which our results are sensitive <strong>to</strong> our estimates of the effects<br />
of education on social program spend<strong>in</strong>g, we replicated all the calculations assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that the effects of <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> education were 25 percent smaller than our estimates.<br />
We then calculated the percentage reduction <strong>in</strong> the estimated effect of an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
<strong>in</strong> education for each of the demographic populations if the effect of the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
education on social program spend<strong>in</strong>g were only 75 percent of our estimate. Table 4.2<br />
shows the range of percentage reductions <strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal benefits across the U.S.-born demographic<br />
groups for each <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education level. It also shows the specific demographic<br />
group for which the sensitivity <strong>to</strong> the 25 percent reduction <strong>in</strong> the estimates of<br />
the effects of education was smallest and largest.<br />
Reduc<strong>in</strong>g the estimate of the effect of an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education <strong>from</strong> less than high<br />
school graduate <strong>to</strong> high school graduate on social program spend<strong>in</strong>g results <strong>in</strong> roughly<br />
the same percentage decrease <strong>in</strong> estimated <strong>to</strong>tal benefits for all demographic groups.<br />
<strong>The</strong> same is true for an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> education <strong>from</strong> less than high school graduate <strong>to</strong><br />
bachelor’s degree or more. <strong>Increases</strong> <strong>in</strong> education <strong>from</strong> high school graduate <strong>to</strong> some<br />
college and <strong>from</strong> some college <strong>to</strong> bachelor’s degree or more have different effects on dif-