The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...
The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...
The Benefits to Taxpayers from Increases in Students - RAND ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
30 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Benefits</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Taxpayers</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>Increases</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Students</strong>’ Educational Atta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />
Federal personal <strong>in</strong>come taxes—taxes on <strong>in</strong>come levied at the federal level.<br />
We use family <strong>in</strong>come data <strong>from</strong> the 2002 adm<strong>in</strong>istrations of the SIPP (U.S. Census<br />
Bureau, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c) and 2002 taxation rates by <strong>in</strong>come group (Parisi,<br />
2004 –2005) <strong>to</strong> estimate federal <strong>in</strong>come tax payment on a family basis. We split this<br />
amount among all adults <strong>in</strong> the family <strong>to</strong> compute tax payments by <strong>in</strong>dividuals. We<br />
then model payments as a function of education level, age, and demographic characteristics<br />
(gender, place of birth, and race/ethnicity). F<strong>in</strong>ally, we forecast payments<br />
throughout the entire life of an adult through age 79 us<strong>in</strong>g appropriate survival rates<br />
<strong>to</strong> estimate the differential impact of education level on public revenues.<br />
This approach understates the effects of education on federal <strong>in</strong>come tax payments.<br />
Because more highly educated people earn more, on average, and federal <strong>in</strong>come taxes<br />
are progressive, the more highly educated adults <strong>in</strong> a family contribute disproportionately<br />
more <strong>to</strong> the family’s tax obligation. By attribut<strong>in</strong>g a proportional share of federal<br />
tax payments <strong>to</strong> each adult <strong>in</strong> the family, we understate the effects of education level<br />
on federal tax payments.<br />
We excluded Earned Income Tax Credits (EITCs) due <strong>to</strong> highly <strong>in</strong>adequate data<br />
<strong>in</strong> the SIPP. In the full SIPP <strong>to</strong>pical tax module sample of 68,700 people, 66,800 did<br />
not even answer the EITC question. Another 900 responded “don’t know.” Only 862<br />
claimed any EITC. Response choices for EITC amount were <strong>in</strong> terms of brackets of<br />
$200, and 122 of the responses (15 percent of the beneficiary subsample) were <strong>in</strong> the<br />
broad “more than $3,500” category.<br />
EITC is now the largest transfer program, larger than Temporary Assistance <strong>to</strong><br />
Needy Families. Because <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> education level result <strong>in</strong> higher earn<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
<strong>in</strong> education level will reduce the likelihood of participation <strong>in</strong> EITC. <strong>The</strong> exclusion<br />
of EITC <strong>from</strong> this analysis therefore biases the estimates of the effects of education on<br />
the costs of social support programs downward.<br />
Federal payroll taxes—taxes on earn<strong>in</strong>gs levied at the federal level that f<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
Social Security and Medicare benefits. We use <strong>in</strong>dividual earn<strong>in</strong>gs data <strong>from</strong> the 2002<br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istrations of the SIPP and statu<strong>to</strong>ry tax rates (and the Social Security tax cap) <strong>to</strong><br />
estimate payroll tax payment on <strong>in</strong>dividual basis. However, payroll taxes are paid only<br />
by those who have any earn<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong>refore, we first model the probability of employment<br />
as a function of education level, age, and demographic characteristics. For those<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals who work, we then model tax payments based on educational atta<strong>in</strong>ment,<br />
age, and demographic characteristics. F<strong>in</strong>ally, we forecast payments throughout the<br />
entire life of an adult through age 79, us<strong>in</strong>g appropriate survival rates, <strong>to</strong> estimate with<br />
the differential impact of education level on public revenues.<br />
State <strong>in</strong>come, property, and sales taxes—taxes on <strong>in</strong>come that are levied at<br />
the state level and taxes on consumption that are levied at the state and local level,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sales, real estate, and excise taxes. We use family <strong>in</strong>come data <strong>from</strong> the 2002<br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istrations of the SIPP and national average state and local tax rates by <strong>in</strong>come<br />
group <strong>to</strong> estimate state tax payments on a family basis. We divide this amount evenly