13.04.2014 Views

rural-urban dynamics_report.pdf - Khazar University

rural-urban dynamics_report.pdf - Khazar University

rural-urban dynamics_report.pdf - Khazar University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 MACROECONOMIC, TRADE, AND AID DEVELOPMENTS GLOBAL MONITORING REPORT 2013<br />

FIGURE 1.15<br />

Real GDP per capita growth rates<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

–1<br />

–2<br />

–3<br />

can reflect a broad range of market and government<br />

failures, and the result can be concentration<br />

in sectors with limited scope for<br />

productivity growth and quality upgrading,<br />

such as primary commodities. In turn, this<br />

can lead to less broad-based and sustainable<br />

growth, as well as increased exposure to<br />

adverse external shocks and macroeconomic<br />

instability.<br />

A recent IMF Staff Discussion Note<br />

(Papageorgiou and Spatafora 2012) sheds<br />

more light on the role of diversification in the<br />

macroeconomic performance of low-income<br />

countries, examining diversification not<br />

just in trade but also in the broader domestic<br />

economy. Using existing data, as well as<br />

a new IMF cross-country dataset covering<br />

output in 12 sectors and several new country<br />

case studies, this work reviews and extends<br />

the evidence pointing to diversification as a<br />

crucial aspect of the development process.<br />

For an extended period, many low-income<br />

countries enjoyed little success in diversifying<br />

exports and production. The situation<br />

broadly improved after the mid-1990s, with<br />

significant changes in both the type and quality<br />

of goods produced and exported. Regions<br />

and countries differed greatly, however, in<br />

the degree to which they succeeded in carrying<br />

out this economic transformation. In<br />

Diversification spurts and growth accelerations<br />

–4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Years before and after diversification breaks<br />

Nonfragile low-income countries<br />

Fragile low-income countries<br />

Sources: COMTRADE, World Economic Outlook; and IMF staff estimates.<br />

particular, Sub-Saharan Africa is far less<br />

diversified and produces relatively lowerquality<br />

goods than Asia.<br />

Greater diversification is associated with<br />

improved macroeconomic performance,<br />

including both lower volatility and higher<br />

growth. “Diversification spurts,” that is, episodes<br />

of rapid, sustained diversification, are<br />

associated with a 17 percent average reduction<br />

in the volatility of output growth in<br />

emerging market and developing countries,<br />

and a 30 percent decrease in output volatility<br />

in low-income countries.<br />

Analogously, diversification spurts are<br />

associated with sharp subsequent accelerations<br />

in growth. This is especially true for<br />

nonfragile low-income countries (figure 1.15).<br />

More broadly, initial diversification is, on<br />

average, positively associated with subsequent<br />

growth, although there is much cross-country<br />

heterogeneity.<br />

These findings raise a key policy question:<br />

What factors can spur or, alternatively,<br />

impede diversification? Both policy and institutional<br />

factors can influence the transition<br />

to more diverse production structures and<br />

thereby affect the pace at which growth can<br />

be sustained. For instance, policy barriers<br />

and structural rigidities in labor and product<br />

markets, or underdeveloped financial<br />

systems, may hamper the process of diversification.<br />

Likewise, insufficient or low-quality<br />

public infrastructure may retard the development<br />

of those sectors that rely disproportionately<br />

upon it; this factor may prove especially<br />

important in low-income countries, where a<br />

large portion of investment stems from the<br />

public sector.<br />

Case studies provide some tentative evidence<br />

in support of findings. First, diversification<br />

and structural transformation are<br />

often underpinned by reforms and policy<br />

measures that are general in scope. Macroeconomic<br />

stabilization is a clear example.<br />

But even microeconomic measures are often<br />

broad-based, focusing on improving the<br />

quantity and quality of infrastructure or<br />

essential business services, or on setting up a<br />

welcoming environment for foreign investors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!