13.04.2014 Views

rural-urban dynamics_report.pdf - Khazar University

rural-urban dynamics_report.pdf - Khazar University

rural-urban dynamics_report.pdf - Khazar University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 MACROECONOMIC, TRADE, AND AID DEVELOPMENTS GLOBAL MONITORING REPORT 2013<br />

many of those natural resource sectors, such<br />

as mining, are capital intensive and will not<br />

provide the jobs needed to accommodate the<br />

rapidly growing working-age population in<br />

the region.<br />

The recent growth in real wage levels in<br />

China, together with Sub-Saharan Africa’s<br />

demographic dividend—implying declining<br />

dependency ratios in the future—suggest that<br />

manufacturing in Sub-Saharan Africa could<br />

become increasingly competitive. But irrespective<br />

of whether economies grow through<br />

strengthening the manufacturing sector<br />

(Mozambique, Tanzania) or services (Kenya,<br />

Mauritius), it is unlikely that they can do so<br />

without first experiencing a major acceleration<br />

of agricultural productivity growth.<br />

Update on trade trends and<br />

trade policy developments<br />

Post-crisis recovery in trade has been<br />

uneven<br />

Since the outbreak of the financial crisis over<br />

four years ago, global interdependency has<br />

been underscored by the largely synchronized<br />

nature of trade trends between high-income<br />

and developing countries. As of November<br />

2012, neither the United States nor the European<br />

Union had surpassed pre-crisis levels<br />

of imports, although their combined share<br />

of world imports remains sizable, at roughly<br />

one-quarter of the total. On the other hand,<br />

Japan and large emerging economies like<br />

Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China,<br />

and South Africa (BRICS) have seen their<br />

import levels rise steadily above pre-crisis levels,<br />

a trend that began in early 2009 (figure<br />

1.19). These divergent recovery trends have<br />

translated into weak trade performance in<br />

regions that have traditionally relied on U.S.<br />

and EU markets. Exports from Europe and<br />

Central Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean,<br />

and Sub-Saharan Africa all hover only<br />

slightly above pre-crisis levels. The situation<br />

is especially dire for countries in the Middle<br />

East and North Africa that are not members<br />

of the Gulf Cooperation Council; in these<br />

nonmember countries, political developments<br />

combined with external economic factors<br />

have led to a steady decline in exports since<br />

late 2011. Meanwhile, other regions have<br />

adjusted with more success. The East Asia<br />

and Pacific region has experienced steady<br />

positive real export growth, fueled not only<br />

by China, but also by smaller economies such<br />

as Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, and the<br />

Lao People’s Democratic Republic. In South<br />

Asia, positive real export growth in Bangladesh<br />

and India helped the region experience<br />

the strongest export recovery, peaking<br />

in December 2010 at a level one and a half<br />

times higher than pre-crisis levels. Since then,<br />

however, South Asia’s export performance<br />

has been lackluster.<br />

Global trade in 2012 was hampered by<br />

a mid-year slump in global imports and<br />

steadily contracting import demand on<br />

the part of high income countries, with the<br />

Euro area at the epicenter. Growth rates for<br />

world imports of industrial goods during<br />

the first half of 2012, year-over-year, were<br />

negative (World Bank 2013). At the same<br />

time, increased import demand in developing<br />

countries helped mitigate the dearth of<br />

demand in high income economies. Developing<br />

countries’ real exports also fluctuated<br />

considerably in 2012, with differences across<br />

countries and regions.<br />

Protectionist outbreak avoided despite<br />

uncertain future for global economy<br />

According to the World Trade Organization’s<br />

(WTO) monitoring of trade protectionist<br />

measures, 190 new trade-restrictive measures<br />

were introduced by Group of 20 (G-20) countries<br />

between mid-October 2011 and mid-<br />

October 2012 (figure 1.20). While this represents<br />

a slowdown compared with previous<br />

years, the new measures add to the stock of<br />

restrictions put in place since the outbreak of<br />

the crisis. The growing accumulation of trade<br />

restrictions is of concern not only because it<br />

undermines the benefits of trade openness,<br />

but it also exacerbates the combined effects of<br />

the new measures with pre-crisis restrictions<br />

and distortions, such as agriculture subsidies<br />

and tariff peaks. Nevertheless, in the five<br />

months leading up to October 2012, the pace<br />

of removal of previous measures was better

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!