13.04.2014 Views

rural-urban dynamics_report.pdf - Khazar University

rural-urban dynamics_report.pdf - Khazar University

rural-urban dynamics_report.pdf - Khazar University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOBAL MONITORING REPORT 2013 MACROECONOMIC, TRADE, AND AID DEVELOPMENTS 71<br />

FIGURE 1.25 Net ODA received per capita by<br />

groups of countries ranked by MDG targets met or<br />

on track to be met by 2015 (2009–11)<br />

FIGURE 1.26 Net ODA received per capita by<br />

groups of countries ranked by MDG targets met or<br />

on track to be met by 2015<br />

US$ (constant 2010)<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

64<br />

7 16<br />

Fragile states<br />

98<br />

70<br />

413<br />

Small<br />

states<br />

56 39 26<br />

Heavily indebted<br />

poor countries<br />

0–2 MDG targets met or on track to be met<br />

by 2015 (23 countries FSC, 33 SST, 24 HIPC )<br />

3–5 MDG targets met or on track to be met<br />

by 2015 (1 country FSC, 1 SST, 4 HIPC)<br />

6–10 MDG targets met or on track to be met<br />

by 2015 (1 country FSC, 1 SST, 3 HIPC)<br />

US$ (constant 2010)<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

17<br />

7<br />

9<br />

1990–92<br />

14<br />

5<br />

0–2 MDG targets met or on track<br />

to be met by 2015 (114 countries)<br />

3–5 MDG targets met or on track<br />

to be met by 2015 (12 countries)<br />

6–10 MDG targets met or on track<br />

to be met by 2015 (8 countries)<br />

4<br />

19<br />

4 4<br />

2000–02 2009–11<br />

Source: OECD DAC 2012.<br />

Note: FSC = fragile states; SST = small states; HIPC = Heavily indebted<br />

poor countries.<br />

Source: OECD DAC 2012.<br />

Note: FSC = fragile; SST = small states;<br />

HIPC = Heavily indebted poor countries.<br />

track to achieve no more than two MDGs<br />

received an annual average of $64 per capita<br />

in 2009–11 (figure 1.26).<br />

Fragile, small, and heavily indebted poor<br />

countries (HIPCs) also suffered the consequences<br />

of a smaller amount of ODA disbursements<br />

from 2010 to 2011 (figure 1.27).<br />

Fragile states and small states received 6 percent<br />

less in ODA disbursements than they did<br />

in 2010; and the flow to HIPCs decreased by<br />

4.1 percent.<br />

Fragile states—those countries often in<br />

internal conflict or with severe political instability—are<br />

the developing countries most<br />

challenged in meeting the Millennium Development<br />

Goals. These countries are typically<br />

characterized by weak institutions and macroeconomic<br />

instability. For obvious reasons,<br />

peace- or state-building activities take priority<br />

over economic policy making. Macroeconomic<br />

policy advice and implementation are<br />

hampered by lack of timely and reliable statistics.<br />

Effective engagement by international<br />

organizations and development partners<br />

requires a recognition of the limited capacity<br />

FIGURE 1.27 Net ODA disbursements to fragile,<br />

small, and HIPC states<br />

US$ millions per capita (2010 prices)<br />

0.14<br />

0.12<br />

0.10<br />

0.08<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

0.00<br />

1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010<br />

Fragile<br />

states<br />

Small<br />

states<br />

Source: OECD DAC 2012.<br />

Note: HIPC = Heavily indebted poor countries.<br />

HIPC<br />

and large financing needs of these fragile<br />

countries.<br />

Fragile states are vulnerable countries<br />

with few if any resources available with<br />

which to address vulnerabilities. In a possible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!