31.07.2014 Views

INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA CO-MANAGEMENT (IPAC) - BIDS

INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA CO-MANAGEMENT (IPAC) - BIDS

INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA CO-MANAGEMENT (IPAC) - BIDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 5.59: Lorenz curve: Gura fish<br />

Cumulative income share (%)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Gini Coefficient = (Area A)/(Area A+ Area B)<br />

Line of equality<br />

Gura fish<br />

Area A<br />

Lorenz<br />

curve<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Cumulative income decile (%)<br />

Area B<br />

Gini Coefficient = 0.53<br />

5.3.3 Sada (Large) Fish<br />

An average collector of sada (large) fish earns annual income in the range of only Tk 63,311<br />

(but much higher compared to golpata or gura fish), almost progressively followed by<br />

Farias/Beparis (Tk 85,407), Choto Mahajans (Tk 89,023), Boro Mahajans (Tk 648,970),<br />

Aratdars (271,888), wholesalers (Tk 156,952) and retailers (Tk 127,510) (Table 5.17). Unlike in<br />

other products such as golpata and gura fish, Boro Mahajans in the value chain earn the highest<br />

amount of income, presumably as they play as Aratdars too. The degree of inequality in the<br />

value chain appears to be quite high in that the average annual income earned by a collector, for<br />

example, estimates as more than 10 times as less as earned by an Aratdar.<br />

In terms of total income aggregated for all actors, only 4.4 percent is due to collectors, followed<br />

by Farias/Beparis (5.9%), Choto Mahajans (6.2%), Boro Mahajans (45.0), Aratdars (18.8%),<br />

wholesalers (10.9%) and retailers (8.8%) (Figure 5.60).<br />

In terms of deciles distribution of income, the distribution appears to be again skewed (Table<br />

5.18). Considering two deciles, representing two extreme actors groups - Decile 1 for the<br />

bottom-ranking actors and Decile 10 for the top-ranking actors, the evidence suggests that the<br />

top 10 percent (Decile 10) of the actors earn as high as 19 times as much income as the bottom<br />

10 percent (Decile 1) (i.e., 1:19) (See Figures 5.61 and 5.62) . Gini coefficient for Sada (large)<br />

fish estimates as 0.44, which is a bit lower compared to most other SRF products.<br />

Table 5.17: Annual income level of SRF Actors: sada (large) fish<br />

Actors Monthly income Duration (Month) Annual % of total<br />

Peak Non-peak Peak Nonpeak<br />

Adjusted income income<br />

non-peak<br />

Collector 6,704 4,997 6.00 5.70 4.620 63,311 4.39<br />

Faria/Bepari 8,404 5,901 7.14 4.86 4.305 85,407 5.92<br />

Choto 10,460 6,799 5.67 5.50 4.370 89,023 6.17<br />

Mahajan<br />

Boro 57,500 46,210 7.67 4.50 4.500 648,970 44.97<br />

Mahajan<br />

Aratdar 30,867 16,761 6.33 5.67 4.564 271,888 18.84<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!